I mean multiplaye is so fun and balanced after this new patch is out if it makes it less laggy it will be great.

bugs, i played again last night on my well over the top spec gfx card and its still not smooth, even when im getting good fps. i was in a better mood so i just ignored the bugs last night but its still annoying its almost impossible to headshot people as the cursor doesnt move smoothly. in BC2 i have no problems!

stuff like like metabolism as medic not recharging is also annoying.

I don't understand why people like CoD, or what the deal with dubstep is, or what's so hilarious about Entourage... it's just a matter of taste.

Oh, and it freezes your PS3 if you open the XMB on loading screens.

yip i love the brink and i cant believe there's so many fussy people out there these days bangin on about graphics poppin. you should see L.A. Noire that games really bad for it (im an xbox owner by the way). and i hardly get an lag i dont know why but it happens very little to me. and i normally find if i do i just join another game and its fine no lag.

You either have to be joking, or lying.
L.A. Noire barely has any pop in, but even then. It's understandable in that game. Know why? YOU HAVE THE ENTIRETY OF L.A. TO GO THROUGH IN THE GAME.

Brink has such small and narrow map's that the pop in is embarrassing.This problem is solved if you have the game installed. Geez, last time I saw pop in this bad was either Borderlands or Halo 2. Both of which have far more to do and travel through.

While on lag, the game is inconsistent. But when it's there. it's game breaking.

Oh, and on topic. This game is so disliked because it's not worth it's money. A.I. is bad. Graphics are subpar, as is gameplay. Parkour is under utilized, weapons are very samey across most of the board. Only eight maps with NO variations. A completely stripped campaign mode, that is in fact the same across all of the other game modes. Which there aren't really.

This game is so disliked because its not a easy shooter. When I look how most people play online (I′m on PS3) I must say, that they don′t understand the Game.
People handle this game like a 0/8/15 (simple) Shooter. The round start and they run away. Aim for the main object without Buffing, without tactic, without the commandposts and than they come to complain, because they get span trapped for example.

Best sample is that many people think that there is a lack of Parkour. There is so many Parkour in this game but its not in front of your nose, you have to look out for it!

Like I said, I′m on PS3 and Bug/Glitch and Lag free. I can understand that people are pissed, when they have technikal problems with the game but tbh I think that this are not sooo many.

Oh and of course whining is always louder than applause!

:jammasterjay:

Cause this game is a 40 euro alpha version?

Maybe thats why?

And i'am not even overreacting.

Only a little. Or you simply don't know what an Alpha version would be.

Well for all the fun it's brought so far, and the fun I anticipate it to continue to bring, Brink's been worth every cent to me. And I paid a LOT more than most, even buying the cheapest retail price in the country.

But if people are complaining about the 360 version, complain on. From what I'm seeing and reading, most of us PS3 and PC users are enjoying a relatively hassle-free experience with little lag, marred only by inconsistent AI when not playing Versus.

I like Brink, quite a bit, it's fun it's something different to play for now, but I do think this patch should fix things up with lag.. And when does that DLC come out? I heard it would be free. I hope the DLC adds a LOT more to Brink.

I saw some videos of L.A. Noire. That game looks incredibly boring to me.

All high-profile game releases will always attract a wide range of players with different play styles and expectations of the game. Unfortunately, it is a known fact that in the first month or so of a game's launch, the most active users on the forums are those who aim to start an argument, those who because they dislike the game, believe that nobody else should be able to enjoy it.

To summarize, you have to learn to ignore such individuals and ride out the launch storm. Once that is done, you can get down to business, discussing things in a manner that produces good feedback and constructive criticism.

Because this is not a mainstream game. Players want to be good at a game in the first 10 minutes and they don't want to learn to play a game anymore.

Sometimes it's good to be confronted with the fact that you're getting old. Stupid kids and their nonexistent attention spans.

Picking Brink up for PC today, can't wait :]

ITT People try to convince themselves it's Brinks difficulty* that's turning away players and not its massive technical flaws and VERY average execution.

*It's not difficult, at all.

I agree that Brink is not difficult to learn and has technical issues, I'm not avoiding that, but seriously... Have you ever played domination in a CoD game? How hard can it be to run up to a flag and stand there for a few seconds with no enemy in sight? Easy XP right? I've play so many games where my entire team would run passed an uncaptured flag, multiple times, it amazes me. Try telling that crowd they should flank, defend a fellow player or learn different paths on a map. Anything that is not 'point and shoot' seems beyond such players. How do you expect them to react to an obvious team-based, objectives orientated game?

Don't throw the game away after one day, but learn how to do actual teamplay by playing more?

But, liek, it takes SOOO many shootz 2 kill sum1, this gaem blows!!!11! :banghead:

I do believe this...




and this....





...sum it up rather nicely.

That would be the right idea. Somehow I doubt that players who are unable to get beyond 'run and gun' will take the time to learn. Even in Bad Company 2 I'm amazed at the poor strategic choices made by some of the players. I mean, if you get stabbed while sniping in one spot two times in a row, would you sit there for a third time? A fourth? A fifth? Yes, even a sixth time? I have six tags from one player stupid enough to snipe from the US base on the Arica Harbour map while I was doing one of my knife-games. Can't expect much from someone like that, can you?

I dont think its a matter of people not liking the game as much as it is a matter of people not like the state in which it was released and then SD being so slow to address the issues. Remember this game has been finished for 2 years and they have been polishing it for the past 2 years, supposedly. That is why people are upset and the lack of actual game content and storyline.

Dont listen to the BS that people dont get it cause there are plenty who "get it" and are pissed about what I stated above. The leg riders will have you believe that its COD players, or whiners that dont like it. This is liberalist tactics. They lie and try to obfuscate the truth to broaden the community numbers so they arent left as "the few" still playing.

I play on 360 and I really don't have any problems. It's tons of fun and I love it a lot. Just wish more people would play though...

I'm in no way a "leg rider", the game has issues, but I think people act like it should have been more than was reasonable to expect.

If this is what upset you from Brink you should go play an other game indeed. Brink was never supposed to be a singleplayer game.. So why even expect a (better) storyline? I would have rather see them not put in a SP option at all so they could have done more work on the MP.

Lack of content is also not a problem. The amount of guns and customisation are huge. There are not that many maps but there are enough and even coming more (for free). The only thing Brink maybe lacks is gamemodes. However I don't see this as a real problem because there is enough variation in the missions.