Dragon Age: Origins, Awakening & DA2

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:02 am

So it's just generally "When Valve does it they're awesome, when BioWare does it they svck"?

No one's brought up that Bethesda released Arena and Daggerfall as free downloads? I thought that was generous of them, but I sure don't see any old Arena/Daggerfall fans complaining about how Bethesda made them free. I mean, if those original Arena players only waited one decade, they could have had the game for free instead of having to pay for it. :P
User avatar
Yung Prince
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:45 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:32 pm

No one's brought up that Bethesda released Arena and Daggerfall as free downloads? I thought that was generous of them, but I sure don't see any old Arena/Daggerfall fans complaining about how Bethesda made them free. I mean, if those original Arena players only waited one decade, they could have had the game for free instead of having to pay for it. :P

The difference is that you don't need to buy Fallout 3 to get it.
User avatar
Dj Matty P
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 12:31 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:05 pm

The difference is that you don't need to buy Fallout 3 to get it.

Yes, that's the issue that everyone is so pissed about... :rolleyes:

In that case, I'll bring up Valve once again. As I already said, Portal was offered for free only through Steam. That means that you had to download and install Steam and register a Steam account in order to get it. Indeed, doing all that is free (as opposed to buying DA2), but it's pretty much the same thing - Valve increasing the number of people who use Steam by forcing them to use Steam if they want to get Portal for free, while at the same time that conveniently increases general interest in the upcoming Portal 2 (if that's your favourite way of looking at things - glass half empty). So I ask again - why was no one pissed off about that? I haven't seen a single person say not even one bad comment about that move by Valve, whereas now it's almost that I haven't seen a single person say that what BioWare has done is a nice thing. Why? That makes no sense to me.
User avatar
Nienna garcia
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 3:23 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 11:25 am

That is subjective, you know. I have enjoyed DA2 just as much as I have enjoyed DA:O. I guess people don't like it because its story is much more "local", so to speak, than the story from the first one. I don't see that as a bad thing though.

Neither do I, the story of Origins was overdone at that point, not to mention now. It was refreshing to see something different for once.

EDIT: You paid for something and now someone gets it for free. Act like an advlt and deal with it.
User avatar
Hayley Bristow
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 12:24 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:35 pm

Does it really matter so much what other people think about it...? :mellow: For the record I'm one of those who's somewhat unimpressed by the offer, but it's just another opinion. :shrug:
User avatar
Robert Jr
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:49 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:39 pm

No one's brought up that Bethesda released Arena and Daggerfall as free downloads? I thought that was generous of them, but I sure don't see any old Arena/Daggerfall fans complaining about how Bethesda made them free. I mean, if those original Arena players only waited one decade, they could have had the game for free instead of having to pay for it. :P

Those are so old that their entire market value is based on the scarcity of hard copies.
User avatar
Amber Ably
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 4:39 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:00 pm

So it's just generally "When Valve does it they're awesome, when BioWare does it they svck"?


Well EA is evil and thus they must have ulterior motives giving away something for free, whereas Valve are the champions of the PC platform and do stuff like this for the love of the players :hehe:

It might've been a better idea to give some of their older games for free, such as NWN or BG, but of course they want to increase the ME playerbase for ME2 DLC and ME3. There's the ulterior motive ;)
User avatar
daniel royle
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 8:44 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:03 am

It might've been a better idea to give some of their older games for free, such as NWN or BG, but of course they want to increase the ME playerbase for ME2 DLC and ME3. There's the ulterior motive ;)

Well there is always an ulterior motive when a commercial game company decides to (temporarily) release one or more of their games for free, whether it's to make their public image better or to increase the player-base of that or another game or both.
User avatar
meghan lock
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:26 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:52 am

I don't understand why so many people dislike DA2, in my opinion it is an amazingly fun game that keeps me entertained from start to finish. :(. It saddens me that people are so disappointed with it.

Good job BioWare for making a great game :). Anyways I am glad that I got my copy of ME2 for like ten bucks, I would be pissed that I bought it full price to find out that they are giving it away!

I understand they don't like it because it was dumbed down a lot from the first one. For example character creation has a lot of stuff removed, like the ability to pick another race besides human. Also you can't change your companions armor, the game is shorter, there are less places to explore, you can't talk to your companions at anytime, the characters aren't as good as DAO, and most people think its more linear than DAO was. I for one still like this game because the story is good, I don't like all the changes they've made but I do like the combat better in this game on consoles.
User avatar
Janine Rose
 
Posts: 3428
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:59 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:09 pm

I understand they don't like it because it was dumbed down a lot from the first one. For example character creation has a lot of stuff removed, like the ability to pick another race besides human. Also you can't change your companions armor, the game is shorter, there are less places to explore, you can't talk to your companions at anytime, the characters aren't as good as DAO, and most people think its more linear than DAO was. I for one still like this game because the story is good, I don't like all the changes they've made but I do like the combat better in this game on consoles.

I think what some people have a problem with is the phrase "dumbing down": whether or not it was intentional, it can have somewhat pejorative connotations. But that aside, I'm inclined to agree; although not all of those points bothered me quite so much, I think it was pruned back excessively and whilst the same approach worked well with ME2 in that it felt streamlined minus some of the cruft from ME1 (with reservations), they pushed the idea much too far with DA2 which IMHO suffered as a result, especially in combination with it being rushed to market.

Again, I also enjoyed playing it a lot, but I was left with a nagging feeling that it could have been better both in terms of quality and quantity: it was a good game that could have been great.
User avatar
SHAWNNA-KAY
 
Posts: 3444
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:22 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:19 pm

I understand they don't like it because it was dumbed down a lot from the first one.

So was ME2, yet people LOVE it.
User avatar
emma sweeney
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:02 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:05 am

So was ME2, yet people LOVE it.

Some did. I hated it.
User avatar
Spaceman
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:09 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:52 am

So was ME2, yet people LOVE it.

Yes but a lot of people hated it aswell.
User avatar
m Gardner
 
Posts: 3510
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:08 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:43 pm

Even ME feel to much of a shooter for me, unless of course, you like "the pause".
User avatar
DAVId Bryant
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:41 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 5:01 am

Even ME feel to much of a shooter for me, unless of course, you like "the pause".

It basically was a shooter. Thats why they just said screw it with ME2 and made it a pure shooter.
User avatar
Kortknee Bell
 
Posts: 3345
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:05 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:11 am

It basically was a shooter. Thats why they just said screw it with ME2 and made it a pure shooter.

But the pointless cutscenes they make it an rpg!
User avatar
JLG
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 7:42 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:56 am

But the pointless cutscenes they make it an rpg!

The choices also. It is a RPG but just barely.
User avatar
Dina Boudreau
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:59 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:01 am

I didn't like ME2 at all but the first ME was pretty good, I'm replaying ME2 in hopes of ME3 actually being decent.
User avatar
Nicole Coucopoulos
 
Posts: 3484
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 4:09 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:47 am

The choices also. It is a RPG but just barely.

And yet it gets heaps of praise, and beats legitimate rpgs and gets rpg of the year among other crap it dosent deserve. If it was advertised as a shooter then it would be a good one, but its trying to be something its not, and that annoys me, especially when it beats other things that are much more rpg heavy.
User avatar
jessica robson
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:54 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:01 pm

And yet it gets heaps of praise, and beats legitimate rpgs and gets rpg of the year among other crap it dosent deserve. If it was advertised as a shooter then it would be a good one, but its trying to be something its not, and that annoys me, especially when it beats other things that are much more rpg heavy.

I agree, even if Mass Effect 2 was a great game. It does not deserve RPG based awards because it really isn't a RPG. In fact, Mass Effect 2 makes Fallout 3 look like a tactical RPG and thats a borderline shooter.
User avatar
zoe
 
Posts: 3298
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 1:09 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:44 pm

That is subjective, you know. I have enjoyed DA2 just as much as I have enjoyed DA:O. I guess people don't like it because its story is much more "local", so to speak, than the story from the first one. I don't see that as a bad thing though.

No, I don't like it for many more reasons than a "local" story.

Yes, I played it; my brother bought it. Lost interest in it and had no intention of finishing it.

Some of the reasons I don't like it; character restrictions, weapon restrictions, can't build the party I want, trashing continuity with Origins and Awakening, the super hyper kung fu movie over the top fighting, disjointed story, voiced pc, and the wheel o'hints that kills choosing dialogue, for starters. The zombiespawn retcon, gumby ogre mutation, the mentioned nowhere until now qunari horns, and the mutated elves, among others. The sudden addition of the "Enemy Parachute Corps" wave mechanic in *every* *single* *fight*. Companions your pc can't talk to unless they are in a certain area, companions not recognizing they have been with you when you can talk to them, and the "unique" clothing thing, additionally.

I could deal easily with a well told "local" story. Its the rest of the stuff that kills the game for me.

And yes, some people loved ME2. I didn't like it all that much. Between the obvious railroading and the "streamlining" that they corrected with dlc [Miranda's spandex catsuit], it was a continuation of Shepard's story. I'd like to see the end of that and seriously doubt I'll continue with any interest in the ME universe past that.
User avatar
jesse villaneda
 
Posts: 3359
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:37 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:42 pm

No, I don't like it for many more reasons than a "local" story.

Yes, I played it; my brother bought it. Lost interest in it and had no intention of finishing it.

Some of the reasons I don't like it; character restrictions, weapon restrictions, can't build the party I want, trashing continuity with Origins and Awakening, the super hyper kung fu movie over the top fighting, disjointed story, voiced pc, and the wheel o'hints that kills choosing dialogue, for starters. The zombiespawn retcon, gumby ogre mutation, the mentioned nowhere until now qunari horns, and the mutated elves, among others. The sudden addition of the "Enemy Parachute Corps" wave mechanic in *every* *single* *fight*. Companions your pc can't talk to unless they are in a certain area, companions not recognizing they have been with you when you can talk to them, and the "unique" clothing thing, additionally.

I could deal easily with a well told "local" story. Its the rest of the stuff that kills the game for me.

And yes, some people loved ME2. I didn't like it all that much. Between the obvious railroading and the "streamlining" that they corrected with dlc [Miranda's spandex catsuit], it was a continuation of Shepard's story. I'd like to see the end of that and seriously doubt I'll continue with any interest in the ME universe past that.


I didn't like most of the changes but I still recommend playing through it at least once. Its not that long so you wont suffer for long.
User avatar
Danii Brown
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:13 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:17 am

can't build the party I want, trashing continuity with Origins and Awakening

What exactly do you mean by these?


the super hyper kung fu movie over the top fighting

I actually liked that. I say if they're going to fight anyway, I don't see why it couldn't be amusing to look at. ^_^


disjointed story

Subjective claim, at best. I haven't noticed anything disjointed about the story.


voiced pc, and the wheel o'hints that kills choosing dialogue

Wait what...

You've... played Mass Effect (1 and/or 2) and liked it, right? :huh:


The zombiespawn retcon, gumby ogre mutation

Again, I don't know what this means.


the mentioned nowhere until now qunari horns, and the mutated elves

Hey, they're DA's Klingons. :shrug:


The sudden addition of the "Enemy Parachute Corps" wave mechanic in *every* *single* *fight*.

Yes, that was annoying...


companions not recognizing they have been with you when you can talk to them

I'm sorry to say that I don't quite understand what this is supposed to mean either.




(With seriously no hidden semi-offensive sarcasm, I think I might be a bit too sleep deprived, what with so frequently not understanding stuff... :unsure: )





edit:
And of course, I forgot to add the main reason why I absolutely love this game:


IT'S [CENSORED]ING DEPRESSING.
User avatar
Dan Stevens
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 5:00 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:54 am

Ok guys, seriously, go make you own thread for [censored]ing about the state of affairs in rpgland. Your opinions have been stated, they are known, you basically have nothing else to add to this thread. Go fight the good fight somewhere else.
User avatar
Deon Knight
 
Posts: 3363
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:44 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 5:36 am

IT'S [CENSORED]ING DEPRESSING.


My turn to post pictures: http://i54.tinypic.com/2cxj4w1.jpg (Shamelesly from the http://social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/141/index/6594400/1 thread from BSN :blush:)

Meanwhile my Spirit Healer Blood Mage seems to working quite well, the spells are quite handy too, an AoE, healing from corpses, and the Blood Slave have proven quite handy (using the sacrifice speel would be very out of character, so it don't acknowledge it), and with http://dragonage.wikia.com/wiki/Cold-Blooded and some accessories the health loss is neglible, further offset with the health and health regeneration boost from Spirit Healer spec. Add mods for http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197988732882/screenshot/595807815426868200?tab=public http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197988732882/screenshot/595807815426871786/?tab=public ;)
User avatar
Rob
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 12:26 am

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games