DRM has gone too far

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:15 am

How can they ban him from playing his games? An internet connection is not required to play any BW games.


The game attempts to log in as soon as you run it. Just as it can download new stuff, code disabling the game can likewise be downloaded.

It would be like Microsoft not liking something I post up on the Xbox 360 forum and they send a code to my Xbox so it won't let me log in and play any games under my username (or even lock me out completely).
User avatar
Shirley BEltran
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:14 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:59 am

Isn't this how Steam works? If your account is banned for some reason you lose access to all your games, single-player included. Why is it more of an issue when Bio/EA do it?
User avatar
Katie Pollard
 
Posts: 3460
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:23 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:59 am

Isn't this how Steam works? If your account is banned for some reason you lose access to all your games, single-player included. Why is it more of an issue when Bio/EA do it?


Good question. Steam should get the same flak for it, IF we're talking about a user being banned from posting in the forums.
User avatar
Loane
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:35 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:39 pm

So that would be like saying Obsidian ( I don't say that, just using it as an example) svcks and Bethesda prevents us from playing Arean, Daggerfall, Morrowind, Oblivion, Fallout 3 and New Vegas.

I don't agree with this at all. I was about to buy Mass Effect, not anymore now because it has EA on it now. What is next? We are talking bad about them now, so they are going to ban us from playing our games we bought from them? Could there be more to this and the guy is exagerating or lieing? Maybe, then again, no matter what, you should be banned from the forums, but not banned from playing or INSTALLING games you already bought.

Another reason to hate online registration and activiation.
User avatar
Phillip Hamilton
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 3:07 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 5:44 pm

OK, so http://www.shacknews.com/article/55656/ea-not-banning-game-access it was all a misunderstanding and forum bans should not deny you game access.
User avatar
Sammygirl
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 6:15 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:16 am

The focus here is not what he did, but what EA can do.

Imagine if I called you a ___ ___ ____ ____ ____ _____ _____ and got myself banned from these forums. Would it be justifiable to also prevent me playing Morrowind and Oblivion, for that same infraction, with no other cause?

Right, but then how do the out side parties know the truth? You could have called me a whiny [censored], but what might have happened is you creepily started to forum stalk me and threaten my life. Hell even finding a way to track me down through the online steam feature in New Vegas. So they lock you down and the police are on the way. I dunno, and the people watching wouldn't know because neither party can say anything. All they get is the "HELP MY CIVIL LIBERTIES ARE BEING OPPRESSED" angle.

Edit
There comes the logic in that article. A misunderstanding, you people were calling for blood. Sometimes I have to wonder who the "good" guys really are. One mistake and before any party can attempt to say what's going on and you want some blood. :violin:
User avatar
Skivs
 
Posts: 3550
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:06 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:40 am

The media and a very specific license is what is being sold in the store. You are purchasing the right to put the companies software on your computer.

There is a separate use license that you must agree to during the installation to actually use the software.

If you refuse to accept, or violate their license, they have every right to deny you access to the software You are still free to install and remove the code and resources to and from your machine as many times as you'd like, and that is what you paid for when you purchased it.


Except enforcing a contract which the buyer never gets to see until he pays for the product is illegal. Good luck trying to return it if you open it and read the EULA during install and decide you don't agree with their terms.
User avatar
Megan Stabler
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:03 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:59 am

How can they ban him from playing his games? An internet connection is not required to play any BW games.

Actually, DA2 requires you to log in once to your EA/Bioware account, to verify your legal purchase. After that, you'll not need to log in at all. But this one time binds the serial to your account, thus locking you out of the game in case you are banned from the game account part of your EA account.

But calling a company "devil" on their own forums still is a sure way to risk your access to that board...
Isn't this how Steam works? If your account is banned for some reason you lose access to all your games, single-player included. Why is it more of an issue when Bio/EA do it?

In case of Steam, you get banned from online games when cheating online, or when your purchases are found out (with a fallible mechanism, mind you) to have been not quite legal. Bad credit cards or something like that. Banning someone from the Steam forums does nothing.
User avatar
Your Mum
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 6:23 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 6:17 pm

But calling a company "devil" on their own forums still is a sure way to risk your access to that board...


I wouldn't have a problem if he only got suspended/banned from the forums, but stopping him from playing a game he bought with his money that is single player is not fine. If I called Bethesda the devil on these forums, sure, I may get a warning from the mods, but there's no reason why they should stop me from playing Morrowind or Oblivion or New Vegas.
User avatar
Emma-Jane Merrin
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 1:52 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:17 am

Isn't this how Steam works? If your account is banned for some reason you lose access to all your games, single-player included. Why is it more of an issue when Bio/EA do it?

There is a huuuuge difference between a VAC ban and a Steam ban. You have to do a lot of stupid [censored] to get banned from Steam, but hackers and cheaters are VAC banned all the time.

VAC Bans only prevent you from playing the game in question online on secure servers, you still have access to single player and unsecured servers.

Steam bans do prevent you from playing your Steam games, but those bans are rare and never without reason.

Actually, DA2 requires you to log in once to your EA/Bioware account, to verify your legal purchase. After that, you'll not need to log in at all. But this one time binds the serial to your account, thus locking you out of the game in case you are banned from the game account part of your EA account.


Actually, you never have to log in. You just have to enter your serial key during the installation process. The first time you run the game you see a login menu but you can just press escape to ignore it and play the game. You won't have access to any DLC or online features though.

...or when your purchases are found out (with a fallible mechanism, mind you) to have been not quite legal. Bad credit cards or something like that.

I've never heard of that happening
User avatar
trisha punch
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 5:38 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:44 pm

Good question. Steam should get the same flak for it, IF we're talking about a user being banned from posting in the forums.


Your Steam account and your account on the Steam forums are two very separate entities. You create a second login name and password when you register for Steam's forums, and it is in no way tied to your account full of games. (Unless you fail at account security forever and use the same username/password combo on the forums as you do for your Steam account, but that's another issue entirely...) A ban on Steam's forums does not translate to losing access to your games.

It is possible to get your actual Steam account banned, which would cut your access to even single-player games you've bought through Steam--but I've only seen that happen in cases of fraud or TOS violations. Not for trolling. :shrug:
User avatar
My blood
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 8:09 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 8:22 pm

Despite that I got a BioWare account, I was just wondering of something then. If I bought Dragon Age 2, I would not be able to play it at all since I cannot be online with my 360?
User avatar
Daddy Cool!
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 5:34 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:53 am

Despite that I got a BioWare account, I was just wondering of something then. If I bought Dragon Age 2, I would not be able to play it at all since I cannot be online with my 360?

Hmm... good question. Common sense says no, but you will want an answer from someone with experience on that platform.
User avatar
Dragonz Dancer
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 11:01 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:22 pm

Actually, you never have to log in. You just have to enter your serial key during the installation process. The first time you run the game you see a login menu but you can just press escape to ignore it and play the game. You won't have access to any DLC or online features though.

Even better then. Though I don't know why Bioware told us differently before release then. ^_^
I wouldn't have a problem if he only got suspended/banned from the forums, but stopping him from playing a game he bought with his money that is single player is not fine. If I called Bethesda the devil on these forums, sure, I may get a warning from the mods, but there's no reason why they should stop me from playing Morrowind or Oblivion or New Vegas.

Exactly my opinion. Householder's rights are nice and all, but this should not be mixed with purchase rights management.
User avatar
Ernesto Salinas
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 2:19 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:53 am

OK, so http://www.shacknews.com/article/55656/ea-not-banning-game-access it was all a misunderstanding and forum bans should not deny you game access.


That was from 2008 though. This was a recent post and unless he's lying or exaggerating he cannot play his game until his ban is lifted.

Except enforcing a contract which the buyer never gets to see until he pays for the product is illegal. Good luck trying to return it if you open it and read the EULA during install and decide you don't agree with their terms.


That's what I'm thinking too. I do think it's possible to take them to court over this and have them pay any fees, which is common when suing. I'm not saying someone might want to put up with it all, but I do think out of pocket fees could be minimal if anything at all.

It's all possible this is also an oversight on their part, that you cannot activate any of your games if you are banned. It better be an oversight. It better not be on purpose.

EDIT: This is also important, from that forum post screenshot:

2. EA community bans come down from a different department and are the result of someone hitting the REPORT POST button. These bans can affect access to your game and/or DLC.


Then later he says End of line, a very cold and uncaring manner.

Is #2 stated on the box anywhere? Is it stated anywhere at the point-of-sale that a community ban can affect your access to the game you're purchasing?
User avatar
Aaron Clark
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 2:23 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 7:29 pm

Right, but then how do the out side parties know the truth? You could have called me a whiny [censored], but what might have happened is you creepily started to forum stalk me and threaten my life. Hell even finding a way to track me down through the online steam feature in New Vegas. So they lock you down and the police are on the way. I dunno, and the people watching wouldn't know because neither party can say anything. All they get is the "HELP MY CIVIL LIBERTIES ARE BEING OPPRESSED" angle.

Edit
There comes the logic in that article. A misunderstanding, you people were calling for blood. Sometimes I have to wonder who the "good" guys really are. One mistake and before any party can attempt to say what's going on and you want some blood. :violin:

You've missed the point again. For the purpose of this discussion we shall assume the banning works the way we had been led to believe at the time of my previous post.

I am not saying he shouldn't have been banned. That may have been fully justified, I do not know the details behind it. I'm saying that what people are getting so upset about is a forum ban preventing someone playing one or more legally acquired games. We're talking about the principle here, not the instance.

If you received an account suspension here for linking to a medical article which contained nudity (and nothing more), would you consider it fair to also be banned from whatever Zenimax games -multiplayer and single player- you happen to own?
User avatar
Eve Booker
 
Posts: 3300
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 7:53 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:13 am

Despite that I got a BioWare account, I was just wondering of something then. If I bought Dragon Age 2, I would not be able to play it at all since I cannot be online with my 360?

IIRC, the policy with microsoft's rules is that the addons work on your xbox account even when offline, if your lucky EA isn't going against that
User avatar
Amie Mccubbing
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 11:33 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:11 pm

I already said screw EA when they bought westwood.
User avatar
Honey Suckle
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 4:22 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 8:45 pm

This is why I hardly buy any games for the computer.
User avatar
Big mike
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:38 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:19 am

Oh cool! Now game developers can send us to our room and restrict our activities when we're naughty. :facepalm:
User avatar
Elina
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:09 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 8:57 pm

Steam bans do prevent you from playing your Steam games, but those bans are rare and never without reason.

Over the years I've heard several first-hand accounts (from individuals I consider trustworthy, several of whom were vocal Steam proponents prior to their experiences) about their Steam accounts being suspended/banned because whatever automated system Steam uses to ban accounts somehow triggered. In all cases account access was restored after about a week of back and forth with Steam's support, with the ultimate response from Steam support basically being "oops." So to answer the original question, people can and do have their Steam accounts banned, occasionally through absolutely no fault of their own. Something for those who buy games from Steam to keep in mind.
User avatar
Taylah Illies
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:13 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:43 am

http://social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/141/index/6487137/1
User avatar
Claudz
 
Posts: 3484
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 5:33 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:41 am

By Fernando Melo...

This was a genuine mistake made by an individual. And clearly there was a failing in the system that actually allowed them to escalate this directly to a full lockdown of the account contrary to how it should flow.

This was never an issue that warranted an account level ban (which, I have to call out is incredibly rare in any case), but normally this would never go beyond a temp ban of the forums with zero impact to games. Trying to portray this as a purposeful or vengeful act 'just because' is immature, not to mention inconsistent with how we actually operate if you care to observe.

As I mentioned before this is a serious issue that we need to fix - as in properly fix, as you suggest. It is not acceptable that something like this happens accidentally, even once.

The purpose of this system is not to feed our egos and dangle axes over player's heads in some sort of power trip - it is there specifically to protect players. To maintain some structure and order to our communities so they don't degenerate into what many other forums look like, and allow you to have a place where you can have a reasonable discussion, or ask a game related question without a some kind of explicit picture being thrust in your face, and yes - in very extreme cases to distance persistent, deliberately malicious individuals from other players IF necessary as a last resort (or at least until they realize it, cool off and get their act together).

Still, that person is supposed to be able to continue to play offline. The goal is to close off the online features where this extreme measure is needed (again, this should be extremely rare). But what we realized with this incident is that while you can completely keep playing offline with an existing game, you can't register a new game since when you login to register the account comes back as invalid. This is new for us, and not intended.

Anyways, long story short (as its late here) - before we rush in with our torches and pitchforks, we need to properly figure out what happened. That will take some time to sort out.

In the meantime, what I've already heard is that the EADM team is going to start working on a fix for game clients to ensure that players will at least be able to register and play offline, even in these rare extreme scenarios. That won't be an overnight fix, but it's a start.


http://social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/141/index/6465725/60
So, an accident, not censorship.

As for SecuRom allegations: http://social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/141/index/6194280/29#6490247
User avatar
James Smart
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:49 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 6:13 pm

Terrible, terrible apology/explanation. Whoever that imbecile is should not participate in PR anymore. He's making it seem almost like they're the victim, of reactionaries. He should be apologizing, briefly explaining the mistake, apologizing again, and ensuring everyone they're working on making sure it doesn't happen in the future, in that order. Nothing else, no comments about reactionaries being immature or talking about mob mentality with torches and pitchforks.

Who let this guy say these things? The customer is always right and when a bug in your system screws them over you do what I said in the 3rd sentence, not what this guy did.
User avatar
Da Missz
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:42 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:45 am

Actually the customer is rarely right, most of the time he's just being obnoxious.

Not saying that necessarily applies in this case, I just think that the phrase "The customer is always right" is wrong
User avatar
Deon Knight
 
Posts: 3363
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:44 am

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games