Duel swords should be stored on the back, Bethesda

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 1:32 am

The storage of anything on the back, including sword and shield, is entirely impractical except for traveling.

If anything, I'd like to see a mod that removes back storage entirely.
Thank you!

I long for the day that a game will feature staffs that are simply carried. Did you see Gandalf sling his staff onto his back when he wasn't fighting? No, he used it as a walking stick!
User avatar
Star Dunkels Macmillan
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 4:00 pm

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 6:14 am

The storage of anything on the back, including sword and shield, is entirely impractical except for traveling.

If anything, I'd like to see a mod that removes back storage entirely.


Actually, a large number of shields in history have a sling attached. This allows you to easily sling it over your shoulder for times you don't need it, and provide easy access to it should you be surprised.


Swords on the back are possible, even practical, but Drawing swords out of a scabbard strapped to your back is not. At least not for anything much longer than your forearm. Human arms simply aren't long enough. Sure, it can be done, but it isn't easy, it isn't quick, and it is a great way to accidentally slice the back of your neck open.


You are also likely to wear the sword on your Right hip, not your left. Why? Because it is actually easier to draw the sword from the scabbard in a lot of cases for many fashions. Easier to draw in tight quarters and not accidentally chop a bit of flesh out of a buddy, catch it on your shield as you ward off a blow, etc. The usage switched throughout history, but last I had heard the modern opinion, based on art and re-constructive archeology is that the right hip was favoured more for a longer period of history, and the left hip-cross-draw is really a modern invention for 'small swords/walking swords' and their like. (You don't have a shield to worry about, and your left hand can hold the sword steady, leaving your right hand free for all of its gentlemanly duties.)
User avatar
Lalla Vu
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:40 am

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 9:02 am

Nothing should be stored on the back except abnormally large swords during a march. Staffs should always be held.

The whole stuff sticking to the back trope makes me want to swear at kittens.


This would be so awesome with a fitting walking animation.
User avatar
Michelle davies
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:59 am

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:48 am

Actually, a large number of shields in history have a sling attached. This allows you to easily sling it over your shoulder for times you don't need it, and provide easy access to it should you be surprised.


Swords on the back are possible, even practical, but Drawing swords out of a scabbard strapped to your back is not. At least not for anything much longer than your forearm. Human arms simply aren't long enough. Sure, it can be done, but it isn't easy, it isn't quick, and it is a great way to accidentally slice the back of your neck open.


When I say that storing a shield on your back is impractical, I'm referring to putting it behind you at the small of your back, Zelda or Dragon Age style.

Your second paragraph highlights what I'm referring to.
User avatar
Suzie Dalziel
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 8:19 pm

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 6:02 am

I liked how Dragon Age Origins did this (though they forgot the scabbards). I would also like to see the Shield on the back for those who have it equiped (also like DAO).

Minor issue though since I play almost entirely in first person.
User avatar
Gavin boyce
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 11:19 pm

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:51 am

Isn't the storage of swords on your back something that looks 'cool' but really isn't as feasible as a scabbards affixed to the belt?



Nothing should be stored on the back except abnormally large swords during a march. Staffs should always be held.

The whole stuff sticking to the back trope makes me want to swear at kittens.



The storage of anything on the back, including sword and shield, is entirely impractical except for traveling.

If anything, I'd like to see a mod that removes back storage entirely.



Yep, I agree.

I would much rather have my weapons sheathed realistically than strapped to my back "cause it looks cool hurr".

Luckless also makes a good point. http://www.gamesas.com/index.php?app=forums&module=forums§ion=findpost&pid=19678258
User avatar
Lory Da Costa
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 12:30 pm

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 1:31 am

Please, no weapons carried on your back. Not greatswords, not staves and certainly not one-handed weapons. It is impractical, and it just makes the drawing animations look weird and the weapons will clip through their scabbards. Shields, on the other hand, I'm okay with being carried on the back.
User avatar
Monika Krzyzak
 
Posts: 3471
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 11:29 pm

Post » Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:51 pm

I won't have my sword on my back if i have to quick draw it. :shakehead: Thats why knights had it on the opponent side of their sword arm. I also don't think in a real fight two swords would be a good choise. In a game it MIGHT look good if they are on the back but useable...mh :vaultboy:
User avatar
Chloe :)
 
Posts: 3386
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 10:00 am

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 12:52 am

I definitely notice this and am annoyed by it. I thought it was very weird as well.
User avatar
Laura Mclean
 
Posts: 3471
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:15 pm

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:35 am


One-handed weapons (duel) should be stored on the back


But what about weapons for combat not between two individuals with pre-approved rules? :obliviongate:
User avatar
Cartoon
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:31 pm

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 12:23 pm

I never noticed any of this...I play in First Person...



Me too. And I don't look at my character all that much anyway. So I could care less where the weapons show up or not at all. And I feel certain that Bethesda would have included all that if they could. But I bet the reason they didn't include it was because of a framerate or rendering problem or something like that.
User avatar
rae.x
 
Posts: 3326
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:13 pm

Post » Wed Dec 14, 2011 9:55 pm

I didn't know there were dueling swords in Skyrim.
User avatar
Dona BlackHeart
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 4:05 pm

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:21 am

Drawing any double-edged medieval longsword from a scabbard isn't particularly graceful in a pinch irrespective of where you store it. I actually had an opportunity to try drawing a sword from my back with the scabbard on a sling; it wasn't fast but it was feasible, and would be FAR more comfortable to carry than on your hip.

EDIT: as for dual swords though, they'd be less practical to draw from the back unless they're shortswords. To draw the longsword from my back in a reasonable timeframe I had to yank the sling with the other hand; taking the sling straight off and pulling it out that way was more 'graceful' though, and was probably faster on reflection.
User avatar
Richard Thompson
 
Posts: 3302
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 3:49 am

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:40 am

Dual blades worn on the back look cool but it's more importantly impractical. Staves on the other hand are meant to be used as a support while walking, so it's unnatural to have to carry them. I think long swords (ones longer than human legs) weren't used by ordinary infantry but knights used them while fighting on horseback.
User avatar
ZANEY82
 
Posts: 3314
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 3:10 am

Post » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:45 pm

I think it would look cool if a single dagger was kept in a sheath horizontally across the small of the back, but that's just a style preference, not a functional preference :P
User avatar
Mariana
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:39 pm

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:25 am

I mean realistically two swords isn't historical or practical at all, so where you store them isn't particularly important :whistling:
User avatar
Sara Lee
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:40 pm

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 10:19 am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IocQ_DZVAU0
User avatar
Melissa De Thomasis
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:52 pm

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 10:28 am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IocQ_DZVAU0

Notice though, if he were wearing it on a sling he could use his left hand to alter the position of the scabbard while drawing, resulting in the last part of the blade coming free much easier.

Of course, if it were on a sling you could also remove the sling very quickly and draw that way.
User avatar
James Hate
 
Posts: 3531
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 5:55 am

Post » Wed Dec 14, 2011 11:10 pm

The SHing noise xDDD
User avatar
matt
 
Posts: 3267
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 10:17 am

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 10:57 am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IocQ_DZVAU0&feature=relmfu

Ninjaed.
User avatar
Hope Greenhaw
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 8:44 pm

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:09 am

I wonder how many fans of back-stored swords have ever tried to draw and sheathe a sword on their back. There's little to no logic for how it would stay there, since most of the "epic back sordzz" in games these days look like they're attached using superpowerful magnets or something.
User avatar
Laura Hicks
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:21 am

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 1:22 am

Actually, I rather think it would look cool if both swords appeared on the characters hip (either the same hip, or both hips depending on the weapons). Having a long sword and a dagger affixed to one hip looks awesome, and was practiced by samurai (just so there's some validity to my claim).

I'm quite tired of the weapons-on-the-back trope. It looks stupid and, well.. stupid.
User avatar
Anna Beattie
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 4:59 am

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 12:30 pm

I wonder how many fans of back-stored swords have ever tried to draw and sheathe a sword on their back. There's little to no logic for how it would stay there, since most of the "epic back sordzz" in games these days look like they're attached using superpowerful magnets or something.

Getting it out is feasible. Putting it back however.. not so much lol.

You'd need to take the sling off to do it in any reasonable timeframe; assuming you are using a sling and it isn't somehow tied to your armour.
User avatar
Laura Elizabeth
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:34 pm

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:33 am

i dont care if the weapons are stored on the back or on the belt actually. BUT:

what really annoys the hell outa me is that the lefthand weapons JUST GOES POFF when sheathing it. this was the same as back in morrowind with ALL weapons but guess what? morrowind is TEN [censored] years old. seriously bethesda this NEEDS a patch. its utter lazyness on your side. no excuse for it sorry absolutly no excuse. thats just lame for a game of today. made me avoid dwing completly because it looks gay to walk around with just 1 small sword on one side.

this should be adressed.
User avatar
Auguste Bartholdi
 
Posts: 3521
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:20 am

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:37 am

i dont care if the weapons are stored on the back or on the belt actually. BUT:

what really annoys the hell outa me is that the lefthand weapons JUST GOES POFF when sheathing it. this was the same as back in morrowind with ALL weapons but guess what? morrowind is TEN [censored] years old. seriously bethesda this NEEDS a patch. its utter lazyness on your side. no excuse for it sorry absolutly no excuse. thats just lame for a game of today. made me avoid dwing completly because it looks gay to walk around with just 1 small sword on one side.

this should be adressed.


Well then you should also wonder, where does your Character store all the weapons you find, where does he put the armor if you wear normal clothes?
Guess it must look like http://www.affordablehousinginstitute.org/blogs/us/Holy_grail_only_a_model_small.jpg
User avatar
megan gleeson
 
Posts: 3493
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 2:01 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim