I would like to begin my argument for the
raging debate over whether the PC should have the option of dual wielding shields by quoting
Kimera, who succintly describes my position.
There are some points in life where you just have to say "[censored] common sense", and punch people with shields.
I vote yes.
Having established said side I am advocating, here is a list of counters to numerous arguments and accusations that it is improper, unfitting, impractical and all in cases quite simply
wrong, to have the ability to dual wield shields, if one so desires.
Firstly, on the topic of 'immersion'.
Haha "Breaking Immersion" seems to be a big topic on this forum now. So much so that people seem to just say it about anything they disagree with.
How would the ability to equip two shields break someone's immersion into the game? If anything, it seems like if you clicked on a second shield and it was like "Nope, you're not allowed to do that. It's impossible to hold two shields in real life.", that would be a little more 'immersion-breaking'.
That being said, I don't care.
As
Frozen50 has said, how can an option that can realistically be attempted in real life then be applied to a game, draw away from any measure of immersion? The simple fact exists, that we can wield two shields simultaneously in real life (however cumbersome that may be), and it can easily occur with the current combat system Skryim is employing.
whats so much different between dual shields and spiked knuckles on each hand? we arent specifically talking about tower shields here...maybe bucklers in each hand or small square shields to induce blunt force deaths.
everytime some says it would look stupid, i cant help but think of giving the shields a razor sharp edge that could be capable of slicing opponents.
Both
EatsDaWolf and
thyco raise the issue that, contrary to some current beliefs, shields
can be used for offensive capabilities, and
can fall under more categories of equipment other then the predefined, standard term of 'shield'. Essentially we see the item dubbed 'shield' take on qualities similar to blunt weapons, fist weapons, bucklers, armored gauntlets and to a certain degree, tonfa. The offensive possibilities are far greater when exercised with a degree of creativity. Certainly the addition of spikes and edges allows more direct methods of engaging in combat, but the dual use of blocking/parrying
and attacking exist, regardless of whether this is an uncommon combination. The path of combat can be made with anything, when one realises that anything can exist as a potential weapon. Let us not forget the http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Morrowind:Sheogorath%27s_Quest, however an unlikely weapon it may be.
Finally, I have referenced
EtherealShadow to put forward the notion that the ultimate decision should lie in the hands of the player.
I agree. I don't really care if other people feel the need to try to fight with two shields (why?) but if you want to, then why the hell not.
Dual wielding shields only increases the already staggering amount of possibilities to customise your character, adding a unique flavour to your play style, and lore. Listing through the numerous posts of 'What will your character be?', popular suggestions include having an eccentric character style, whether it be a crazed Argonian, a Bosmer thief with a body not dissimilar to one of the moons of Jupitor, or a Nord without a beard (how preposterous).
No I will not, IMHO that sounds stupid and impractical.
So long as the option exists, then will both parties be satisfied. If you desire to take it upon yourself to wield two shields, so be it. If not, then please, there is no obligation for you to leap into combat as a moving wall.
Before I finish my rather long, but fun rant, I'd like to cite
Tubi, who emphasises the defensive potential of dual shields.
Yo dawg, I heard you like defence, so we put a shield on your shield so you can defend while defending.
In conclusion, it would be delightful if shields were able to be dual wielded, as there exists a practical combative aspect in both terms of offensive and defensive capabilities, while also providing another flavour of variety to the PC. Lastly, the inclusion of this feature in the game will satisfy the needs of both opposing parties, in that it is totally optional for a player to wield shields in such a way.
However, I have a rather telling suspicion that the Devs, as wonderful and bright as they are, will not let this make the final cut. For is it not written: "There's a feeling in my water"?
EDIT: Spelling corrections.