dunno what's wrong with you guys do but...

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:24 pm

out of around 100 played games.

i've experienced real lag (unplayable really) only once, left the game, found new one, problem solved

my xbox froze only twice (out of +/- 30 hours of gameplay, sp and mp)

experienced some minor bugs sometimes but FAR FAR from being game breaking (talking bout weapon not showing or vision staying blurry until I respawned.

I prefer little bugs than to have to stare at **** graphics like call of duty (looking at you black ops) and ear **** cheap sounds (looking at you black ops) all day long.

I think crysis is GREAT and if they fix every little bug it's gonna be perfect. give it some time. I think we are lucky to be able to play a game like that on a 199$ piece of hardware, actually.
User avatar
Josh Trembly
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 9:25 am

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 6:59 am

We gave Crytek eternity

They spent it eating potato chips and watching Napoleon Dynamite

We deserve consumer rights
User avatar
Verity Hurding
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 1:29 pm

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:45 am

We gave Crytek eternity

They spent it eating potato chips and watching Napoleon Dynamite

We deserve consumer rights


Agreed they made un-necessary gun and module tweaks instead of fixing major bugs.

I'm in total agreeance that all the console fans should be thankful to see such an awesome title hit a console. However, First Person Shooters didn't just come out and these are problems that we shouldn't still be dealing with.

Crytek obviously is making some cheese from its console fans yet we're stuck with host migration garbage we've had to put up with Call of Duty. Servers aren't an impossible feat to ask for and and since the company mainly focuses on PC titles this should be a rather simple task to perform on their part. We know it can be done because the demo had servers.

The sad part is.. We're not hearing from Crytek employees about this ongoing issue yet because they aren't going to do anything about it. They will sit back and let the console fans buy a second rate product while they take that money and stuff their pockets to work on the next title. People will still buy it because of the advertising and the name sells itself.. it's just sad to see we get second rate treatment while PC users get a DX 11 patch the least they could do is turn on a server or two.
User avatar
Alexandra Ryan
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:01 am

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 12:39 pm

We gave Crytek eternity

They spent it eating potato chips and watching Napoleon Dynamite

We deserve consumer rights


Agreed they made un-necessary gun and module tweaks instead of fixing major bugs.

I'm in total agreeance that all the console fans should be thankful to see such an awesome title hit a console. However, First Person Shooters didn't just come out and these are problems that we shouldn't still be dealing with.


What?? Thankful???

They didn't give me a copy of Crysis 2 for free you know!?
User avatar
Undisclosed Desires
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:10 pm

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:00 am

We gave Crytek eternity

They spent it eating potato chips and watching Napoleon Dynamite

We deserve consumer rights


Agreed they made un-necessary gun and module tweaks instead of fixing major bugs.

I'm in total agreeance that all the console fans should be thankful to see such an awesome title hit a console. However, First Person Shooters didn't just come out and these are problems that we shouldn't still be dealing with.


What?? Thankful???

They didn't give me a copy of Crysis 2 for free you know!?


Too many of these clowns forget this, they 'forget' that we fork out many £'s and $'s for this lag infested sh1te.
User avatar
Kirsty Wood
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:41 am

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 12:28 am

yea i know we give them alot of $$$$$$ but it's still imho the best shooter (most fun) on ps3 and xbox atm, no?

in all modesty crysis got :

best graphics out of all fps at the moment

best sound out of many shooters at the moment

great solo with more than 5 hour of gameplay and a lot less linear than other shooters

what else...

hum incredible liberty of movement which is uncommon in most fps at the moment

smooth controls (on par with cod and it's 60fps if you ask me and i'm very picky usually)

most games on consoles don't have dedicated servers anyway (id prefer to have them tho)

so... right now... honnestly... I think its a well spent 60$ no? or do you prefer to play black ops until mw3 comes out? go for it

the only other fps worth of mention are cod 4 and mw2 but they're dead and has been played to death too. And bad company 2 which is a nice game too.
User avatar
Arrogant SId
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:39 am

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:01 am

Dang man does crytec pay you money to talk up their game? But honestly though crysis 2 is a good game just not a great game... the sp is good, but its pretty damn linear I don't know what you are talking about. The sp is pretty much like cod. The mp does definitely have a different feel, which is good and bad. However they "take" a lot from other games, just like every one else, but they do have some different ideas that they use like the suit which is nice.

Just remember one thing though you can have the most beautiful game out there, but if the game play svcks no ones gonna want to play. The biggest thing people ask for here is just communication. We all spent hard earned money on this game, and we all just want to just get something out of it. Your right about one thing if they fixed some small things this game could be pretty dang good.
User avatar
james reed
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:18 am

Post » Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:37 pm

yea i know we give them alot of $$$$$$ but it's still imho the best shooter (most fun) on ps3 and xbox atm, no?

the only other fps worth of mention are cod 4 and mw2 but they're dead and has been played to death too. And bad company 2 which is a nice game too.

Crysis 2 is a great game, but when it comes to online multiplayer, Killzone 2 is the best multiplayer FPS on the PS3. While it may not be nearly as popular in English-speaking nations (US, UK, Australia and Canada), it still continues to sell well internationally, and as tens of thousands of players on every day. Its gameplay is superior to that of its successor, Killzone 3. Guerrilla Games really treated its community like garbage, and not only refused to make changes to serious problems, but proceeded to justify their crappy design choices as well.

Crytek is struggling to keep up with the feedback because it isn't all in one place, and there are thousands of posts all over the place with all these problems people are posting. Instead of making new threads to voice your own complaints, make use of the master threads people have so Crytek can see what the real issues are.

And none of you are entitled to a perfect game simply because you forked over north of $60 for it. If there's anyone to blame for any of the issues or downgrades this game is experiencing, it's the PC community, thanks to the extreme piracy that made a very popular game also a financial flop. Games cost money to make, and designers need to be paid. The CEO of Crytek announced in an interview that a sequel would be on consoles to ensure that people would actually pay for the game, given that console games are more difficult to pirate, and that there would only be a Crysis 3 if Crysis 2 made enough money. Still, common sense dictates that if a game doesn't make very much money, you shouldn't expect a sequel to be bigger and better. That costs the developers money, and if the PC gamers really loved this series, they would've supported it so the sequel could've been all that it could be.

Something tells me that the reason Crytek isn't addressing some of the bigger issues is because - as confirmed - the PC community is still continuing to pirate the game (and are bound to whine if Crysis 3 suffers from more downgrades or never comes to be, because they feel entitled to a sequel to their favorite game done the way they want).

They don't seem to care that developers can't make a good game if they're starving. Game devs get paid crappy salaries and depend on royalty money for the majority of their income. Many have families to feed, and all have bills to pay.

I honestly really don't want to hear about Crytek and EA's corporate greed when PC gamers (who can clearly afford to upgrade their PCs to handle the original Crysis's steep hardware requirements) stole a game that cost around $60 retail because they wanted what they wanted and didn't want to pay for it. EA and Crytek made a console port to ensure that the game sold enough that they could pay their developers, as they're trying to protect people who work for their company. You can't blame them for trying to protect themselves against greedy consumers. As Crytek producer Nathan Camarillo said,

""Piracy is a real concern. The PS3 has been cracked now as well and people are downloading PS3 games and 360 games are being downloaded so that's a threat to just the industry in general. For us specifically, it was a very traumatic experience because we're really excited about the game and the quality that we were able to get into it and what we were able to accomplish... "

So yeah, you guys really should be grateful you even got a sequel to Crysis in the first place.

DX11 support is coming, but the PSN has been shut down down thanks to hacking, and no doubt Crytek is scared stiff, given what happened to their first game, and wants to wait before they update all the systems at once before the PSN comes back online. The PC has already gotten some crucial updates, and hopefully more console updates are on their way, but Crytek needs to protect itself while they're vulnerable.

If you guys really love this series, you'll continue to support it. Not just financially, but through other means. Take an anti-gaming-piracy stance so developers can afford to produce better titles, and support them in the long run.

But hey, at least they aren't Guerrilla Games, and actually give a crap about the feedback we're giving; they're just overwhelmed by the loads of threads about the same issues, instead of everything being kept neatly in one place.
User avatar
Nymph
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:16 am

yea i know we give them alot of $$$$$$ but it's still imho the best shooter (most fun) on ps3 and xbox atm, no?

the only other fps worth of mention are cod 4 and mw2 but they're dead and has been played to death too. And bad company 2 which is a nice game too.

Crysis 2 is a great game, but when it comes to online multiplayer, Killzone 2 is the best multiplayer FPS on the PS3. While it may not be nearly as popular in English-speaking nations (US, UK, Australia and Canada), it still continues to sell well internationally, and as tens of thousands of players on every day. Its gameplay is superior to that of its successor, Killzone 3. Guerrilla Games really treated its community like garbage, and not only refused to make changes to serious problems, but proceeded to justify their crappy design choices as well.

Crytek is struggling to keep up with the feedback because it isn't all in one place, and there are thousands of posts all over the place with all these problems people are posting. Instead of making new threads to voice your own complaints, make use of the master threads people have so Crytek can see what the real issues are.

And none of you are entitled to a perfect game simply because you forked over north of $60 for it. If there's anyone to blame for any of the issues or downgrades this game is experiencing, it's the PC community, thanks to the extreme piracy that made a very popular game also a financial flop. Games cost money to make, and designers need to be paid. The CEO of Crytek announced in an interview that a sequel would be on consoles to ensure that people would actually pay for the game, given that console games are more difficult to pirate, and that there would only be a Crysis 3 if Crysis 2 made enough money. Still, common sense dictates that if a game doesn't make very much money, you shouldn't expect a sequel to be bigger and better. That costs the developers money, and if the PC gamers really loved this series, they would've supported it so the sequel could've been all that it could be.

Something tells me that the reason Crytek isn't addressing some of the bigger issues is because - as confirmed - the PC community is still continuing to pirate the game (and are bound to whine if Crysis 3 suffers from more downgrades or never comes to be, because they feel entitled to a sequel to their favorite game done the way they want).

They don't seem to care that developers can't make a good game if they're starving. Game devs get paid crappy salaries and depend on royalty money for the majority of their income. Many have families to feed, and all have bills to pay.

I honestly really don't want to hear about Crytek and EA's corporate greed when PC gamers (who can clearly afford to upgrade their PCs to handle the original Crysis's steep hardware requirements) stole a game that cost around $60 retail because they wanted what they wanted and didn't want to pay for it. EA and Crytek made a console port to ensure that the game sold enough that they could pay their developers, as they're trying to protect people who work for their company. You can't blame them for trying to protect themselves against greedy consumers. As Crytek producer Nathan Camarillo said,

""Piracy is a real concern. The PS3 has been cracked now as well and people are downloading PS3 games and 360 games are being downloaded so that's a threat to just the industry in general. For us specifically, it was a very traumatic experience because we're really excited about the game and the quality that we were able to get into it and what we were able to accomplish... "

So yeah, you guys really should be grateful you even got a sequel to Crysis in the first place.

DX11 support is coming, but the PSN has been shut down down thanks to hacking, and no doubt Crytek is scared stiff, given what happened to their first game, and wants to wait before they update all the systems at once before the PSN comes back online. The PC has already gotten some crucial updates, and hopefully more console updates are on their way, but Crytek needs to protect itself while they're vulnerable.

If you guys really love this series, you'll continue to support it. Not just financially, but through other means. Take an anti-gaming-piracy stance so developers can afford to produce better titles, and support them in the long run.

But hey, at least they aren't Guerrilla Games, and actually give a crap about the feedback we're giving; they're just overwhelmed by the loads of threads about the same issues, instead of everything being kept neatly in one place.

well said Prophet!

oh and if you guys think crysis 2 is THAT linear try killzone 3... and give me some news...
User avatar
JR Cash
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:59 pm

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:56 am

O please,

The single player (bugs aside) is a pretty revolutionary game, fair play.

The Multiplayer - well this is where it differs.

A lag infested quagmire of indecision : Powered by Cry Engine 3.

Just do one and give us dedicated servers = happy days.
User avatar
Ellie English
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:47 pm

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:35 pm

yea i know we give them alot of $$$$$$ but it's still imho the best shooter (most fun) on ps3 and xbox atm, no?

in all modesty crysis got :

best graphics out of all fps at the moment

best sound out of many shooters at the moment

great solo with more than 5 hour of gameplay and a lot less linear than other shooters

what else...

hum incredible liberty of movement which is uncommon in most fps at the moment

smooth controls (on par with cod and it's 60fps if you ask me and i'm very picky usually)

most games on consoles don't have dedicated servers anyway (id prefer to have them tho)

so... right now... honnestly... I think its a well spent 60$ no? or do you prefer to play black ops until mw3 comes out? go for it

the only other fps worth of mention are cod 4 and mw2 but they're dead and has been played to death too. And bad company 2 which is a nice game too.

Very good comments in the text above, I am still loving this game after a month of playing it straight. But Crytek needs to step up and at least fix Grain Glitch on MP/SP and AI issues as well as the very CRITICAL MP Regional Filter.... Pleeeaaassee CryTek....
User avatar
Emily abigail Villarreal
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:38 am

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:14 pm

yea i know we give them alot of $$$$$$ but it's still imho the best shooter (most fun) on ps3 and xbox atm, no?

in all modesty crysis got :

best graphics out of all fps at the moment

best sound out of many shooters at the moment

great solo with more than 5 hour of gameplay and a lot less linear than other shooters

what else...

hum incredible liberty of movement which is uncommon in most fps at the moment

smooth controls (on par with cod and it's 60fps if you ask me and i'm very picky usually)

most games on consoles don't have dedicated servers anyway (id prefer to have them tho)

so... right now... honnestly... I think its a well spent 60$ no? or do you prefer to play black ops until mw3 comes out? go for it

the only other fps worth of mention are cod 4 and mw2 but they're dead and has been played to death too. And bad company 2 which is a nice game too.

agree, crysis 2 is a pretty decent and fun game. it has some flaws, but they're not game-breaking imo. and most of these issues could be resolved with a simple patch. this game will get me trough till bf3 finally arrives.
User avatar
Suzy Santana
 
Posts: 3572
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:02 am

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 6:10 am

I think crysis is GREAT and if they fix every little bug it's gonna be perfect.
User avatar
Amber Ably
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 4:39 pm


Return to Crysis