I was kicked off of the EA forum for calling EA an evil Nazi empire. I am very proud of that, plus I think they just proved my point. Censoring people is one of the main tasks of an evil empire.

You clearly violated the EA TOS and deserved what you got handed to ya.

Nvidia paid for DX11.
Why'd you think Nvidia paid Crytek money lol?

Crysis 2 was listed as a DX11 game by one of their sponsors.
Crytek dropped the ball.

Crytek didn't drop the ball. DX11 simply wasn't ready for shipping. All evidence points to that fact.

Absolutely unacceptable and late. I blew 60 dollars on this piece of crap software. How do you take a step back on your code Crytek? How is it possible that a game that is over 5 years older than this is FAR better? I'll tell you how, they do not care about putting out a quality product. The response is simple on my part EA/Crytek. Its called torrenting the rest of your titles for the rest of my life. Your shareholders wont be enjoying my money anymore.

Need to get that bich some DX 11 news, biches love DX 11 news... Wait, what? There is none? ****...

when are you going to release this man

Guess what ? What you typed is so destructured that it's not making any sense.
First off, it makes perfect sense. The first line was jokingly written to convey how stupid the argument was.

Secondly 'destructured' is a verb meaning 'to destroy', the word you were looking for is 'unstructured' - which still is incorrect. Poorly worded sentences do not fall under the structure of a paragraph.

If you still don't get it:
Poster claimed corridor shooters don't benefit from DX11
A corridor shooter (Metro 2033) is highly praised for it's implementation of DX11, therefore the poster was wrong.

Anything else you need me to spoon feed you?



Guess what ^? You didn't even notice that the word you mention I created it just to say that your argumentation was at the same time destroyed and unstructured, hence the assembly of the words in this way.

Second : Did you play Metro 2033 at least ? No ? Well I did, and even if most of the game is set in the "myetro" there's is a couple of levels that are set outside in Mocba ( Moscow ).
Also what should Artyom do ? Open a superclassy restaurant in the tunnels ? Get drunk ? If he left the "safety" of his subway station it's just because he is looking for his friend and because he has to complete a mission. Also regarding the environment Artyom isn't gonna dig like heck everywhere like in Minecraft.

So let me set this foryou : Metro 2033 is a linear game but definitely not a corridor game.

Dasz bidania tovaritch now

Jeez still not even some more announcement news...? It's been how many months? And not even a screen or whatever. Disappointment growing... unistalling game.

FFS! No further announcements for the whole of last month!

I am so dissapointed to crytek, cause i followed getting ready like a year and spend 800€ to upgrade my PC, so i could handle enjoy the maxium quality and ofcource game looks good, but its CRYSIS good is not enough. Words "my Pc runs crysis 2 max", doest really mean anything atm.

Another thing is that, there is no anykind of date given when the dx11 patch would be coming, cause if they are really doing it they must have somekind of idea when its ready and i wouldn't mind if its gonna take still 2 months, cause i would even knew its coming. Now we can't even know are they even doing it at all.

Have to say that my high recpect to Crytek has gone very low.
Facepalm Crytek

I saw this on the XBOX Forums, and i must share it here its very funny, this was after a console update:

"Thank you for some information. I can't wait to get off work and try this out. I will be letting you know my findings as soon as I have gathered a decent amount of info. Thanks Cry-Adam."

now you wonder whats so funny about that???? here it comes : "I can't wait to get off work and try this out"

In what country do they allow 9 year old Console Kiddies to work? isnt that illegal?

and when do we get our DX 11 patch FFS.

1337th reply!

I wonder when the patch will arrive.

Guess what ^? You didn't even notice that the word you mention I created it just to say that your argumentation was at the same time destroyed and unstructured, hence the assembly of the words in this way.

Second : Did you play Metro 2033 at least ? No ? Well I did, and even if most of the game is set in the "myetro" there's is a couple of levels that are set outside in Mocba ( Moscow ).
Also what should Artyom do ? Open a superclassy restaurant in the tunnels ? Get drunk ? If he left the "safety" of his subway station it's just because he is looking for his friend and because he has to complete a mission. Also regarding the environment Artyom isn't gonna dig like heck everywhere like in Minecraft.

So let me set this foryou : Metro 2033 is a linear game but definitely not a corridor game.

Dasz bidania tovaritch now
Destructured is still a verb and still incorrect in the sentence that you used, give it up. If it was 'destructured' someone would break it down piece of by piece, that didn't happen. The argument itself wasn't destroyed. Your verb means 'the process of dismantling a structure' and the structure is not the meaning of an argument/sentence/paragraph. Grammar is very different to semtantics.

I'm still playing Metro 2033. The clue is in the name. It's about as equal as Crysis 2. Did you play that? The game set in New York city with areas in fact MORE open than Metro? It doesn't matter what you think is a corridor shooter, the main theme of the game was CLAUSTROPHOBIA and that's reflected very clearly as most of the levels are in closed off tunnels, trying to reach the next station...

By your logic Crysis 2 isn't a corridor shooter and therefore it would in fact benefit from DX11. So I was right in the first place. Nice work, detective.

People need to learn that the graphics API has nothing to do with why Crysis 2 is the way it is. Crytek just ported Crysis 2 badly and DX11 isn't going to magically make the game better.

It's actually a fact that Crysis 2 is a good port because it's better than the 360 version, you pay less money, you get a better frame rate. The fact that it didn't come with all the PC stuff you usually expect is just how it is.
Wait, Crysis 2 for PC is a port? I thought the game was made for PC and THEN ported to consoles. Not the other way around :S

The bloke is wrong. it was made on PC first as it's easier to port after the fact. You can tweak specific settings to each platform which is how CryEngine 3 was designed from the start. DX11 option was simply not ready yet is all.

Actually, all 3 versions were made simultaineously due to he nature of the engine. You don't need to play much of the game to realize i was certainly designed with console limitations in mind.

This game is a disgrace to the Crysis franchise!

For me Crysis 2 is a Dead Game like all the games that come out with this Cryengine.
Who played Crysis one knows what I'm talking about.
The gameplay is completely different, like open maps, strategies used, generate the map view, even the fact of picking up ammo and things with destruction, seeming more real as possible.
The DX11 will not change that, just going to improve the details of a game that does not deserve anything.
For me this game was molded only money order.
The CryEngine to compete with Unreal Engiene seeking good graphics and optimization for low wardware.
And multplayer to compete with Call of Duty, simple deathmeat with little creativity.
To me they should close the doors and sell a Crysis for a company to remake the trilogy that everyone who played Crysis expected.

PS: And even that they got, every day has less people playing the "Cryduty" multplayer.

For me Crysis 2 is a Dead Game like all the games that come out with this Cryengine.
Who played Crysis one knows what I'm talking about.
The gameplay is completely different, like open maps, strategies used, generate the map view, even the fact of picking up ammo and things with destruction, seeming more real as possible.
The DX11 will not change that, just going to improve the details of a game that does not deserve anything.
For me this game was molded only money order.
The CryEngine to compete with Unreal Engiene seeking good graphics and optimization for low wardware.
And multplayer to compete with Call of Duty, simple deathmeat with little creativity.
To me they should close the doors and sell a Crysis for a company to remake the trilogy that everyone who played Crysis expected.

PS: And even that they got, every day has less people playing the "Cryduty" multplayer.

Amen, but at least the game will (probably) look pretty and will hopefully attract some of the users who have left the building and maybe get some new ones, too. Crappy sentimental writing, I know, but I don't want Crytek to end up like Remedy, Bungie and Epic. They're talented, after all

For me Crysis 2 is a Dead Game like all the games that come out with this Cryengine.
Who played Crysis one knows what I'm talking about.
The gameplay is completely different, like open maps, strategies used, generate the map view, even the fact of picking up ammo and things with destruction, seeming more real as possible.
The DX11 will not change that, just going to improve the details of a game that does not deserve anything.
For me this game was molded only money order.
The CryEngine to compete with Unreal Engiene seeking good graphics and optimization for low wardware.
And multplayer to compete with Call of Duty, simple deathmeat with little creativity.
To me they should close the doors and sell a Crysis for a company to remake the trilogy that everyone who played Crysis expected.

PS: And even that they got, every day has less people playing the "Cryduty" multplayer.
So what where they supposed to do? Release a 3rd jungle game so people like you could bich 'it's the same game every time waaah booo hooo'.

For me Crysis 2 is a Dead Game like all the games that come out with this Cryengine.
Who played Crysis one knows what I'm talking about.
The gameplay is completely different, like open maps, strategies used, generate the map view, even the fact of picking up ammo and things with destruction, seeming more real as possible.
The DX11 will not change that, just going to improve the details of a game that does not deserve anything.
For me this game was molded only money order.
The CryEngine to compete with Unreal Engiene seeking good graphics and optimization for low wardware.
And multplayer to compete with Call of Duty, simple deathmeat with little creativity.
To me they should close the doors and sell a Crysis for a company to remake the trilogy that everyone who played Crysis expected.

PS: And even that they got, every day has less people playing the "Cryduty" multplayer.
So what where they supposed to do? Release a 3rd jungle game so people like you could bich 'it's the same game every time waaah booo hooo'.


I dont think the jungle has anything to do with it.

For me Crysis 2 is a Dead Game like all the games that come out with this Cryengine.
Who played Crysis one knows what I'm talking about.
The gameplay is completely different, like open maps, strategies used, generate the map view, even the fact of picking up ammo and things with destruction, seeming more real as possible.
The DX11 will not change that, just going to improve the details of a game that does not deserve anything.
For me this game was molded only money order.
The CryEngine to compete with Unreal Engiene seeking good graphics and optimization for low wardware.
And multplayer to compete with Call of Duty, simple deathmeat with little creativity.
To me they should close the doors and sell a Crysis for a company to remake the trilogy that everyone who played Crysis expected.

PS: And even that they got, every day has less people playing the "Cryduty" multplayer.
So what where they supposed to do? Release a 3rd jungle game so people like you could bich 'it's the same game every time waaah booo hooo'.


I should not even respond, but.
I never said that everyone should be in the Jungle, just about the gameplay.
Being able to walk all over NY, by the way you choose.
Crysis 2 was like every game, pre-determined paths, sequences to be followed like any game.
Crysis 2 like everyone else.

For me Crysis 2 is a Dead Game like all the games that come out with this Cryengine.
Who played Crysis one knows what I'm talking about.
The gameplay is completely different, like open maps, strategies used, generate the map view, even the fact of picking up ammo and things with destruction, seeming more real as possible.
The DX11 will not change that, just going to improve the details of a game that does not deserve anything.
For me this game was molded only money order.
The CryEngine to compete with Unreal Engiene seeking good graphics and optimization for low wardware.
And multplayer to compete with Call of Duty, simple deathmeat with little creativity.
To me they should close the doors and sell a Crysis for a company to remake the trilogy that everyone who played Crysis expected.

PS: And even that they got, every day has less people playing the "Cryduty" multplayer.
So what where they supposed to do? Release a 3rd jungle game so people like you could bich 'it's the same game every time waaah booo hooo'.


I should not even respond, but.
I never said that everyone should be in the Jungle, just about the gameplay.
Being able to walk all over NY, by the way you choose.
Crysis 2 was like every game, pre-determined paths, sequences to be followed like any game.
Crysis 2 like everyone else.

Yes, I agree.
In fact, I've pretty much played the original games a different way and taken nearly a different path every time I've played. There are so many different and diverse routes that can be taken. I would elaborate on my opinion further, but at the moment I don't have time. Haha

I can see the DX11 patch for Crysis 2 being released after Crysis 3 (which I can predict will be an Xbox 360 exclusive) at this rate.

How you uh, how you comin' on that patch you're working on? Huh? Gotta a big, uh, big stack of bugfixes there? Gotta, gotta nice bunch of shaders you're working on there? Your big DX11 Patch you've been working on for Months? Huh? Gotta, gotta efficient network code? Yeah? Gotta few new models? Huh? Gotta stable release brewing there? Working on, working on that for quite some time? Huh? (voice getting higher pitched) Yea, talking about that some months ago. Been working on that the whole time? Nice little patch? Bugfixes, new features, and optimizations? Some fixes become bugs, some bugs become fixes? At the end your product is richer from the experience? Yeah? Yeah? (voice returns to normal) No, no, you deserve some time off.

For me Crysis 2 is a Dead Game like all the games that come out with this Cryengine.
Who played Crysis one knows what I'm talking about.
The gameplay is completely different, like open maps, strategies used, generate the map view, even the fact of picking up ammo and things with destruction, seeming more real as possible.
The DX11 will not change that, just going to improve the details of a game that does not deserve anything.
For me this game was molded only money order.
The CryEngine to compete with Unreal Engiene seeking good graphics and optimization for low wardware.
And multplayer to compete with Call of Duty, simple deathmeat with little creativity.
To me they should close the doors and sell a Crysis for a company to remake the trilogy that everyone who played Crysis expected.

PS: And even that they got, every day has less people playing the "Cryduty" multplayer.
So what where they supposed to do? Release a 3rd jungle game so people like you could bich 'it's the same game every time waaah booo hooo'.


I should not even respond, but.
I never said that everyone should be in the Jungle, just about the gameplay.
Being able to walk all over NY, by the way you choose.
Crysis 2 was like every game, pre-determined paths, sequences to be followed like any game.
Crysis 2 like everyone else.
Making the game more linear and story driven was a design choice, it's up to the developer what the gameplay is like. So what's your point? The gameplay is totally different because it's supposed to be. If you want to play Crysis again, go play Crysis. There was enough pre-release marketing to show exactly how the game would work.

They did two open games and wanted to do something different. If YOU don't like the new direction as a consumer, don't buy the game. Find a different one.

Well put

it's stupid to disclaim that C2 SP is GOOD LINIER SHOOTER after all
and despite DX9 and low-res textures almost everywhere the game still look presentable and has good framerate along with it
yes, Crysis fans awaited absolutely another game style
yes, it's shame to give to PC comunity poor x-box port after all advertising (hello, DX11 and PC orienting promisses!)
yes, MP is bugged and too CoD-cloned, no vehicles, extremely small maps, 16 players only (hello x-box orienting)
yes, the game have a fake 3D support (hello concole orienting)
yes, the game story totally fLIcked up for little kids (hello concole orienting)
yes, making 4 sh1t map for 10 bucks for bugged game is unbelievable sh1t CrEAtek have ever done
yes yes yes
but damn
ppl you gotto face it - the MP process can give some fun (if forget about cheaters) and SP gameplay is not bad AT LEAST. it's the one of the very good linier shooters i ever played. not the best of course, but it's still good. if the game had high-res textures and DX11 support, i think SP process would be more interesting
as Crysis and Warhead fan i'm dissapointed with that game of course. but i must admit that the game isn't as bad as some ppl flame. IMHO


btw DX11 news??