An easy solution to this Steam controversy.

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 6:40 pm

The fact that New Vegas, and other Steam games, still got cracked quickly also seems to, it seems to me that Steam really isn't a very effective method of DRM either.

Besides, I don't WANT Steam to be used as DRM. What any DRM should do is provide the maximum level of copy protection possible (Because that's sort of what it's for.) while causing the least inconvenience to the user possible, and the way I see it, Steam, as a means of copy protection, accomplishes neither goal.

In any case, most posts defending the use of Steamworks use the argument that Steam has some features which the poster likes, not that it's an effective form of DRM, so if one wants to appease both sides, the approach would be to not make Steam a requirement for box copies, but also release a Steam version, so those who want Steam can just get that, and those who don't want to don't have to use it.

Amen!
User avatar
leni
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:58 pm

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 8:45 am

An easy solution to this Steam controversy? Buy it on console.




I couldn’t resist.
User avatar
Nathan Barker
 
Posts: 3554
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 5:55 am

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:32 am

Steam is fantastic. Even though my account was hijacked, then permanently disabled, resulting in 40 games gone forever. That's the only thing I don't like. Though, I've had that account since 2006, so of course I like it. Seems like the people who just recently found out about Steam because they bought a game which required it, are also the ones bashing it. "omf wtf is tis steam why i need it? it sux lol. windows live 4ever".
User avatar
danni Marchant
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 2:32 am

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 5:28 am

The fact that New Vegas, and other Steam games, still got cracked quickly also seems to, it seems to me that Steam really isn't a very effective method of DRM either.

Besides, I don't WANT Steam to be used as DRM. What any DRM should do is provide the maximum level of copy protection possible (Because that's sort of what it's for.) while causing the least inconvenience to the user possible, and the way I see it, Steam, as a means of copy protection, accomplishes neither goal.

In any case, most posts defending the use of Steamworks use the argument that Steam has some features which the poster likes, not that it's an effective form of DRM, so if one wants to appease both sides, the approach would be to not make Steam a requirement for box copies, but also release a Steam version, so those who want Steam can just get that, and those who don't want to don't have to use it.

There is absolutely no DRM that is uncrackable and I doubt one will ever be made, DRM in itself is a fundamentally flawed concept. All it affects are the paying customers, whereas pirates do not suffer any of inconveniences of most DRM at all. DRM hurts the people whoa ctually pay for a game while doing nothing to pirates.

Out of all the DRM I've ever seen though, Steam is the least inconvenient, I buy most of my games through Steam anyway as there's usually great sales and it's convenient, so obviously I have no problem with it.
User avatar
Jake Easom
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 4:33 am

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:23 pm

Besides, I don't WANT Steam to be used as DRM. What any DRM should do is provide the maximum level of copy protection possible (Because that's sort of what it's for.) while causing the least inconvenience to the user possible, and the way I see it, Steam, as a means of copy protection, accomplishes neither goal.

In any case, most posts defending the use of Steamworks use the argument that Steam has some features which the poster likes, not that it's an effective form of DRM, so if one wants to appease both sides, the approach would be to not make Steam a requirement for box copies, but also release a Steam version, so those who want Steam can just get that, and those who don't want to don't have to use it.

^What he said.
User avatar
luis ortiz
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 8:21 pm

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 12:27 pm

An easy solution to this Steam controversy? Buy it on console.




I couldn’t resist.


Sadly I agree - although being a huge fan of the series I refused to buy CIV V due to it being steam activated - if Skyrim is associated with steam I will get the 360 version
User avatar
jesse villaneda
 
Posts: 3359
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:37 pm

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 9:08 am

Steam is fantastic. Even though my account was hijacked, then permanently disabled, resulting in 40 games gone forever. That's the only thing I don't like. Though, I've had that account since 2006, so of course I like it. Seems like the people who just recently found out about Steam because they bought a game which required it, are also the ones bashing it. "omf wtf is tis steam why i need it? it sux lol. windows live 4ever".

Uh-huh. You know, some of us have a problem with steam because we support the second-hand video game market, which digital distribution and steam are pretty much the antithesis of.
User avatar
Kirsty Collins
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:54 pm

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 8:55 am

Uh-huh. You know, some of us have a problem with steam because we support the second-hand video game market, which digital distribution and steam are pretty much the antithesis of.

Digital distribution is the future, like it or not, it's here to stay. You can get on board or you can be left behind, that's simply something gamers need to deal with.
User avatar
Taylah Illies
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:13 am

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:35 pm

Digital distribution is the future, like it or not, it's here to stay. You can get on board or you can be left behind, that's simply something gamers need to deal with.

IF It's here to stay, we shouldn't tolerate the current digital distribution buisness model. Transferable licenses FTW!
User avatar
Naazhe Perezz
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 6:14 am

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:19 am

First it's no way skyrim for pc can run Oblivion mods, you could not use Oblvion mod's in fallout 3, or Morrowind mods in Oblivion.
Yes lots of mods was ported from Morrowind to Oblivion.
This usually require serious rewriting.

Bethesda also follow the mod community and might include functions from mods.
One simple function I hope is included is that harvested plants look harvested, Point lookout had this for the fruit you harvested so it's hope.
User avatar
Project
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 7:58 am

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 1:14 pm

There's nothing wrong with Steam. I have tried it with Left 4 Dead 2 (a gift). I hated the fact that I had to make an account but I did it anyway. I wish I didn't as the game svcked. Since I had my hard drive failed I've reinstalled windows and I have not installed Steam again. I won't support it if I don't have to. If you buy a game, you shouldn't have to install anything else to play it. You shouldn't have to get some account.

Personally, I consider steam just like the ask.com toolbar or the google toolbar crap that tries to install with other freeware programs. It's a nuisance. Also, I can sympathize with those without internet access or access so slow you might as well be without. One should NEVER need to go online to activate a single player game. I'd rather buy Skyrim, leave it in the package forever, and find some pirated version rather than install Steam again. I'll probably cave if it looks to be a good game, but I'll have to think hard about it.
User avatar
Rebecca Dosch
 
Posts: 3453
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:39 pm

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 8:09 pm

I am trying to say steam should stop annoying their costumers but that is for there official forums, I believe elder scrolls should be fully steam compatible heck I rather it be a steam only title Their is nothing wrong with steam people please stop commenting on a topic you know noting about! steam is awesome and if you just tried it you will realize why so many steam users love it so much.

There's nothing wrong with steam? pfft. Steam has the same problem as all digital distribution services. They won't let you transfer your licenses.
User avatar
oliver klosoff
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 1:02 am

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:14 pm

DRM's don't work. No matter how much protection people will always find a way to pirate it. And a DRM shouldn't inconvience the customer. Besides, the steam DRM won't stop anymore pirates than standard disk checks. So they should focus on what will inconvienence their consumers the least. Why should I, as a consumer, deal with 3rd party software that is totally unessential to the end goal of me playing my game. I have enough programs running in the background, I don't need another just so I can play one game.

The only real defense you hear in favor of steam is, "but it has these features I like..."
So I am in favor of the OP. It satisfies those who like steam, and those who hate it. And im a fan of options.
User avatar
Kieren Thomson
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 3:28 am

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 9:58 am

You know, we mods tend to lock threads about Steam. Mostly because people either don't read the forum rules, read the forum rules and ignore them, or don't think we're serious about enforcing them. Not because we're censoring anything or there is some conspiracy or whatever.

Could I please ask anyone from this point forward to read the forum rules, and please don't post stuff you really shouldn't just to prove a point about Steam? We really don't like to ban people, under most circumstances.

Some infractions will cause instant termination of your account, such as admitting you have pirated, will pirate, describing or linking to how to pirate any software/media, or causing a major disruption in the forums.
User avatar
Rachael Williams
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:43 pm

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:46 pm

No DRM is pirate proof.

Steam is currently the most accepted form of DRM, a DRM system that is constantly being updated and refined to be more user friendly.

Steam may kill the second hand market for games......but considering the game companies dont get money when you buy second hand, Im pretty they dont care that you cant sell their game back.

Steam is not resource intensive, right click->exit and the entire program will close down if its that big a deal.

If Valve was to ever go bust and steamworks shut down, their would no doubt a patch before it locked us out of all our games, or it would be bought by another company :rolleyes:

Steam is very free with letting people mod the games, Oblivion has no problem on steam.


I think i covered all the complaints.....if you never want to use Steam, well you're missing out/going to miss out on some great games
User avatar
Emmanuel Morales
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 2:03 pm

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:30 pm

If all they wanted to do was use the DRM portion, I'd be fine with that. DRM is here to stay, I'd prefer disk-only checks, but apparently those days are long gone.

It's the entire rest of Steam I want absolutely nothing to do with. Achievements mean nothing to me. Being able to get pestered by in-game ads (I've seen them, don't try and claim they don't exist), pestered by people on the in-game IM features, and in general pestered by it's background monitoring of your every habit is not cool at all.

If Skyrim must absolutely be infected with malware, then infect it with GFWL. That at least doesn't require that I register an account I'll never ever use and can also be removed from the system without damaging the game's ability to run.

Or use DRM like Two Worlds (the first one). One shot authentication request to the mother server, after that, done. No need to hear from them again on it. No nasty stuff running behind the scenes. Dragon Age used a similar system. If you didn't want DLCs and didn't want to participate in the social networking aspects, you simply never logged it in, although they did make you get the account for the DRM authentication to go through.
User avatar
Miss Hayley
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 2:31 am

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 6:23 pm

In-game ads? in my 2 and a half years of using steam i have never seen in-game ads....You do get them when you first load up steam (a popup that can be easily closed) but other then that you never have to see ads again.

And if you are being pesterd by friends on steam while you play, or dotn want them to see what you are playing, simply put yourself in 'appear offline' mode...just like any IM service.


is Steam perfect, No, is it as bad as some people say it is No.
User avatar
Teghan Harris
 
Posts: 3370
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:31 pm

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 8:28 pm

I personally love Steam, I have no problems with it.
User avatar
lacy lake
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 12:13 am

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:58 pm

In-game ads? in my 2 and a half years of using steam i have never seen in-game ads....You do get them when you first load up steam (a popup that can be easily closed) but other then that you never have to see ads again.


I have a bit of an issue with willingly installing adware on my PC. So every time I boot up my PC I would get a popup ad? that's nuts!

I do have a question about steam, does it or does it not collect any data about me, my PC, or how I play games?
I don't mind it knowing that I have this game and that game tied to my account, but if it's collecting any data other than that, that would be an invasion of my privacy..
User avatar
Taylah Haines
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 3:10 am

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:24 pm

Steam may kill the second hand market for games......but considering the game companies dont get money when you buy second hand, Im pretty they dont care that you cant sell their game back.

I'm sorry, but how is this a decent response to concerns about threats to the second-hand market? Who the [censored] cares what the game companies thinks on this issue? What matters is the rights of the consumer, which Digital distribution hinders by stripping us of our right to re-sell. And truth be told, we don't need the Game companies to care. Only one entity needs to care about this, and support the right of re-sell, and then the game companies opinions don't matter. They won't have a choice.

edit: The worst part about digital distributors is that it's incredibly easy for them to fix the problem. They could simply let their users trade their licenses to other users of their system. THen boom, there wouldn't be a problem.
User avatar
Tiffany Castillo
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:09 am

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 5:28 pm

I personally love Steam, I have no problems with it.


that's not true of everyone though, To me Steam is best as an option. If the Skyrim disc came with a disc check & an OPTIONAL Steam product key & had a disc2Steam patch available.
User avatar
Jordyn Youngman
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:54 am

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:31 pm

The game comes with a product key. If you just wish to play without Steam, you install the game as you normally would. If you want the Steamworks features though, you can register your key with Steam, and be marked as an owner of Skyrim.

Bethesda, listen to this. It makes logical sense.
User avatar
Miragel Ginza
 
Posts: 3502
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 6:19 am

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:53 pm

that's not true of everyone though, To me Steam is best as an option. If the Skyrim disc came with a CD check& an OPTIONAL

Yeah, I personally do not think Skyrim should be Steam only, but if it is its not the end of the world, I would buy it for Steam anyway, but for others sakes there should be more options available. But like the Xbox exlcusive DLC for Fallout New Vegas, I have a feeling they made another deal with Steam for PC exclusivity. Probably to get some fast money, but I don't blame them, like any other business they need to make a good profit margin.
User avatar
Alessandra Botham
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:27 pm

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 5:59 pm


User avatar
Minako
 
Posts: 3379
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 9:50 pm

Post » Thu Sep 09, 2010 3:42 pm

I have a bit of an issue with willingly installing adware on my PC. So every time I boot up my PC I would get a popup ad? that's nuts!

I do have a question about steam, does it or does it not collect any data about me, my PC, or how I play games?
I don't mind it knowing that I have this game and that game tied to my account, but if it's collecting any data other than that, that would be an invasion of my privacy..


Nah, jsut the first time you load up the steam window. You dont even have to load up the steam window to play the games if you use shortcuts.

It does record how many hours you have logged into a game....but other then that i dont think it records anything else.
User avatar
James Potter
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:40 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim