I think Markarth would show otherwise. Him being militant I mean.The taking of it, not the Markarth incident bs. I'm not saying Ulfric is better than Tullius, and people bringing up Ulfric doesn't really disprove what is said about Tullius. I'm just simply saying that I don't see him being "great". There's really not enough to go off of to say either of them are great.
Who do you think goes over those plans back home? He does the short handed decisions because that is his job on the field. Ulfric makes the over all campaign decisions. One isn't really more militaristic than the other. Their jobs just are different and Galmar only has the war side of things to think of, which is why he wasn't as concerned about the people's families as Ulfric was when he asked why others were still undecided.