Ok, the topic title is pretty self-explanatory. Start voting away at these polls, and feel absobalutely free to write down any original opinions in a comment at your leisure! XD

the differences have been settled, resistance and security has become one, but yet again, blood begins to boil because they don't like the situation.
security versus the new resistance.
slightly more sci-fi than how Brink1 goes, but i'd let it to the dev's exactly how sci-fi

I quench my thirst with the blood of my enemies and feed on their fear

That would be very difficult to come up with a new story, especially since they aren't going to settle for a good vs evil storyline.

It just feels presumptious to do this. The story and game are SD's not ours.

The game isn't an RPG or novel series. I think you're going to be disappointed with the actual story depth (or lack of) when you finally play the game. Supposedly the world has flooded so everyone would be eating seafood or each other. It's like if Waterworld had the Ark in it. Perhaps it's the last best place to dwell and everyone else is floating on wreckage or old boats. Ark sure has a large amount of munitions though. My point is the world is supposedly post-apocalyptic, but the game is not considering any scavenging aspects during play. I feel the story doesn't really relate to the gameplay.

i do love pirates...

Either danger from the depths or Piracy, and they probably eat a lot of fish.

THIS!

:brokencomputer: how about in the name of innovation you dont go ANYWHERE near aliens from space, aliens from another dimension, or horrible biological creatures from a lab or otherwise some type of accident because..... IT HAS BEEN DONE TO DEATH already.


Don't let the innovation end with freedom of movement!

b-

Agreed