In such a fast paced Multiplayer you need a stable number of frames so you can react whenever you need to (react really really fast. Modern Warfare players know what i'm talkin about). If the game lags like s*** than you'll die all the time. So what Crytek does is they let the multiplayer mode look **** but everybody is able to run the game smoothly. However, I think the Singleplayer will look phenomenal. I'm pretty sure it will (I pray for it
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12544/12544506ae625caa57cfc39f9b39e664a534dcb9" alt="Razz :P"
They shouldnt be downgrading multiplayer if the game is made to scale with hardware. if you need more FPS in multiplayer then lower your settings. What about the people with good PCs who want to play at maximum graphics at 60 FPS rather than at 'toned down mplayer graphics' at 120 fps? It is so people who cant run it at the best settings during multiplayer dont feel butthurt? Because thats the only logical reason i see here.
In this day and age, reducing multiplayer graphics is pretty stupid, especially since multiplayer is supposed to create longevity for the game.
Could you imagine if bf3 did that? lol.