People seem to be making a big deal about refugee rations, but the founders are also rationed (although the conflict implies that the founders are given more than the refugees). Proof of this is in a quote from the game's official web page. "Most Security personnel have volunteered because they're convinced that for the Ark to survive it must have peaceful order and conserve its remaining resources. And the extra water ration comes in useful too."

Also, its impossible for there to be no dry land. As an argument against Noah's Ark being literal, someone did the math and found that even if all of the ice and slow in the world was melted, and all of the water in the atmosphere was condensed into liquid, it wouldn't even be close to a worldwide flood. Shores would be screwed, but they could flee inland. The real problem would be on islands, which i imagine is why there are a lot of islanders seen within the resistance, Jamaicans and such.

So finding land would be a reasonable thing to do, but it brings up a question, is the Ark actually able to propel itself?

The Founders are not rationed. The Security are.

http://brink.chefenco.com/brink-chat-with-paul-wedgwood-eurogamer/

"...Have limited resources, but are doing a pretty good job of managing them, so they have the appearance of still having a luxurious lifestyle."

Managing resources = rationing.

Appearance of having a luxurious lifestyle = pretty luxurious lifestyle still

If I can I will try both, if it's an easy switch or if u get 2 characters 1 for each.

I like to choose the weaker factions because it's more fun that way frustrating sometimes but pretty fun most time!

Though only 2 factions prob be pretty even.

resistance all the way they look way cooler and i like their missions more and plus i no for a fact that someone created like 5 accounts and voted for security on all 5.

You have 16 characters, but each character has a different look for resistance and security (Basically you have 16 characters with 32 looks)

Oh really? So I have 16 slots to create different looking characters? Builds n classes?

Well that's pretty sad.

i no resistance had the majority vote so the kid kept voting for security

First off, it's know not no and second off, wheres your proof?

OK back on subject, I vote Security because I agree with their mission to maintain peace and order.

On the subject of socialism. It all sounds good on paper and when you apply it to other people, but now apply it to yourself. Lets say you spent a ton of money to get a master's, when through a year long internship to get the job you set your sights on and at the end of the day your making as much as the elementary school dropout sign twirler out front. Yeah I bet you REALLY like socialism now.

Well, yes. That is the main downside of Socialism. Except you feel like you accomplished something, while the whiny [censored] outside is thinking to himself - "[censored] I don't do anything useful I stand outside all day and go home to my parents and cry about how I dropped out of elementary school WAAAAAH." That's why Democracy is better - You get out of College, get your dream job, and get thousands of dollars a week, while the stupid idiot outside is thinking to himself the same thing as before, but with the added on weight of "I get $9 an hour, this guy is walking out with a paycheck of friggin' $5,000 a day! WAAAAAH."
So yeah.

First off, it's know not no and second off, wheres your proof?

OK back on subject, I vote Security because I agree with their mission to maintain peace and order.

On the subject of socialism. It all sounds good on paper and when you apply it to other people, but now apply it to yourself. Lets say you spent a ton of money to get a master's, when through a year long internship to get the job you set your sights on and at the end of the day your making as much as the elementary school dropout sign twirler out front. Yeah I bet you REALLY like socialism now.