You have to remember that the in-game locations in FO1 and 2 are just somewhat abstract representations of these locations. The number of characters in-game does not correspond to the actual population.
Plus, some Oil Rig personnel could have managed to escape in vertibirds, and there might have been some smaller outposts aside from Navarro.
Plus, some Oil Rig personnel could have managed to escape in vertibirds, and there might have been some smaller outposts aside from Navarro.
And in Fallout 3 it does? If it did, the population of the Capital Wasteland would be around 700 human souls, and Vault 101 having only 16 people living there.
Since there are no marks of bases outside Navarro, it's not very reasonable to claim there are some. It would be possible of course, but since nobody in the game hints that way and if does, the hint is that there was not supposed to be bases in "up north", and Richardson talks only about Navarro, which anyway was a brand new base.
Point taken, but who actually does that?
Nobody. I was, as you noticed, just making a point. Making a point that it is of no use to poke at the apparently large manpower of the East Coast Enclave when in California they breed extremely fast and in huge quantities, even after their base blew up.
We're talking about soldiers and officers, not mechanics and slaves. Essentially all Enclave "members" who are outsiders are slaves and cheap labor. Keep in mind that the Enclave is behind a lot of the slave and drug trade in Fallout 2.
No, it means that the Enclave are willing to use outsiders for Labour. It is not the same as recruiting into the enclave
Yes that is very clear. Yet the Enclave has "recruiting" as their official image. Calling people to join the joys of slavery wouldn't get much support.
I have falled from the wheel of "point of discussion" in this case anyway. How did this have anything to do with bashing Fallout 3 again?