hello everybody i was thinking if fallout 3 is set 200 years
after the nuclear holocaust wouldnt you think the pepole
of the nuclear wastes have rebuilt a civiliation by now?
tell me what you think
thx
I think this was just another bad decision by Bethesda. In my opinion Fallout 3 is comprised of a myriad of bad decisions and logic. 200 years after the war, there would have been a much greater impact on the wasteland around D.C. I love to speculate and fill in the holes but this is one I cannot, there is no excuse for it.
I think it's rather regress...
compare Vault City, NCR from F2 to Megaton or Rivet City.
Riders, Talon Company are Everywhere, Enclave has its backups, Supermutants kill innocent people, even Deathclaws arent inteligent BoS is spoiled into two two types...
I don't know why you would compare those particular towns, Vault City was built from a G.E.C.K, it's a utopia. And the NCR had a population exceeding 3000 by Fallout 2, though you don't get to see most of this. In FO3s wasteland there just seems to be pockets of civilisation all over. Some would have united with others and formed stronger communities, but this isn't the case.
The Talon Company are mercs, they're not like raiders they don't attack anyone for the hell of it, they would have played little part in the intervention of civilised progress. Enclave didn't even make itself an active presence in the region until you started up the purifier, and again was no intervention in the 200 years preceding. Super mutants have always been a problem in all the regions we have seen so far, but we still had towns like Shady Sands 65 years after the great war, and the Hub was founded just 16 years after the great war. The wasteland was always a harsh place anywhere, D.C isn't the only region bent on ruining civilised progress. Bethesda just messed it up is all.