Fallout 3 DLC vs New Vegas DLC

Post » Fri Jul 19, 2013 11:12 am

I played both games and i can say say that Fallout 3 has way more superior DLC content in comparison to Fallout New Vegas. I found the Fallout 3 DLC missions to be fun, entertaining and useful. New Vegas DLC missions were annoying and irratating. Only DLC map i really liked was The Divided. Honest Hearts was so so, Dead Money and Old World Blues were so annoying play, i never bothered with them when i played New Vegas again. :yuck:

User avatar
Harry Hearing
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 6:19 am

Post » Fri Jul 19, 2013 12:43 pm

Old World Blues annoying? I guess if you aren't a big Sci Fi fan it could be annoying.

User avatar
Paula Ramos
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:43 am

Post » Fri Jul 19, 2013 3:21 pm

I can't just tunnel vision through the New Vegas DLC and randomly kill stuff to get rewards?! Madness! I declare the Fallout New Vegas DLCs as bad because they actually require an ounce of thought and preparation, unlike the Fallout 3 DLCs! Yay me!

User avatar
Marguerite Dabrin
 
Posts: 3546
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:33 am

Post » Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:37 am

New Vegas DLCs were much deeper and entertaining. They each had their own story, but were also connected to the other events going on. Plus they didn't have space battles and little aliens running around.

User avatar
Jose ordaz
 
Posts: 3552
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 10:14 pm

Post » Thu Jul 18, 2013 11:49 pm

Point Lookout and The Pitt were good DLCs but my list of best IMO goes:

1: Dead Money

2: Lonesome Road

3: Honest Heart

4: Point Lookout

5: The Pitt

6: Old World Blues

7: Operation Anchorage

8: Broken Steel

9: Mothership Zeta

User avatar
Noraima Vega
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:28 am


Return to Fallout 3