.

Here, have a link to the same exact topic you just posted. http://www.gamesas.com/index.php?/topic/1209213-fallout-new-vegas-vs-fallout-3/

http://www.gamesas.com/index.php?/topic/1209213-fallout-new-vegas-vs-fallout-3/page__pid__18080242#entry18080242

^^^^^^^ Thread on the exact same subject already in progress. Somehow, I don't think we need yet another.

Theres all ready been about a kazzilion vs threads.

i think not posting any more of these topics is better than both FO3 and FO:NV

I honestly don't understand the "it doesn't feel like there's been a nuclear war" argument. I mean, the point of New Vegas IS that it survived the Great War. It's the one city that somehow survived. That's what makes it unique, that's why it gets it's own Fallout. Of course it's gonna be more advanced than other areas we've visited. But just because New Vegas has a society and a functioning economy, that excuses the decaying buildings, the lack of life and the giant radioactive geckos everywhere? Sure ok.

Other than that, I honestly don't get why it's so important. Like if I buy Dead Space 2 or something and it has less zero-G scenes than Dead Space one, I don't complain and say "it just didn't feel like space enough!" Wtf who cares, it's still a good game and it still fits in it's setting.

They are both good game and both have good areas and bad areas, hell if they merge the games somehow it be very good game.

Both are good, Nuff said.

Plus there is also already a topic of this.

To the OP....Welcome to the forums

Sincerely,

-Ace.

Sorry everyone im new to this kind of thing i didnt know there was all ready lots of the same post

Its fine. :cookie:

Better at what? Its like comparing a Phillips with a Flathead (screw drivers).

I don't think the difference is that drastic. But a better question could be: "Which one do you think is a better asset to the series?" or merely: "Which one better fits your hand -- figuratively?"

Id have to go with Torx