» Tue May 17, 2011 3:16 am
While it would be neat, I don't see any Fallout games outside of the US for a while, if at all. This has nothing to do with the idea that America is better, or that other countries can't support the concept of a post-apocalyptic wasteland. The problem lies in the core of Fallout's setting and sense of humor.
Fallout as a series (well, the proper Fallout games, ie, 1, 2, 3, and New Vegas) is, if nothing else, a giant satire on the American culture. Much of what is being satirized is not just a general sense of Cold War Paranoia and stodgy values, but specifically an American look at said subjects. It can be really blatant or really subtle, like how the book that teaches stealth is a Chinese training manual. Also, most of the cultural idiosyncrasies that are mocked are uniquely American. Not going into too much detail, but that town in Fallout 3 was a dead ringer for the "Leave it to Beaver" show. Even when you look up at the banner above this article, the blurb in the bottom left corner states "America's First Choice in Post Nuclear Simulation". Everything about the game is making fun of America.
Now, here's the thing, if there is a Fallout that is set somewhere else, there's only two ways to approach the subject: either someone from Wasteland America travels there, or the game is simply, independently set there already.
The problem I have with the first option is that if the game stays true to the previous Fallouts, then I can only assume that what has happened in other countries is going to be viewed by someone who, for better or worse, is influenced by this retro-50's mindset (influenced, not completely controlled by). Even the pipboy is clearly a parody of the American retro feel. This is going to superimpose itself with the given surroundings and appear, at best, awkward, and, at worst, very racist.
The problem I have with the second option is a little more oblique. Sure, any place in the world could probably have a great post-apocalyptic story set in them. Let's use the UK for instance (I think expanding out of London to all or most of the UK would be more interesting. One of the things I didn't really like about 3 being only in DC). Now, if the game is firmly set in the UK, the main character being brought up in, say, a Vault of some sort in London, then everything has to change. The pipboy would be different because the art trends, mentalities, and cultural queues would be uniquely British. The sense of satire would have to shift to accommodate a different view on society. Did you ever see the movie 'When the Wind Blows', about a couple in Sussix who don't realize that their country was devastated in a nuclear attack? Yes, that story could have been anywhere, but much of what those two people do are very British in their mindset. But, for arguments sake, say this game is made. Say that the care and attention to satirizing outdated American values shown in Fallout games was done perfectly for the same type of game set in the UK. Would it still be a Fallout game? Besides by name? The game would be so different on so many levels, that I don't think it would.
Fallout is more than just post-apocalyptia. That's why the first Fallout game isn't just called "Mad Max, the Video Game". It seems that, since everything is so heavily grounded in American culture, and dedicated to mocking American culture, that setting the games anywhere else either wouldn't be treated properly, or wouldn't happen at all.