» Thu May 03, 2012 3:54 am
To be honest, I think if they have to pick an ending, they'll go independent vegas and leave it ambiguous whether or not it's house or yes man. Why you ask?
1. Both NCR and Legion intend to invade California/Arizona after their victories. Any game set in the core region would either have to take place during this war, or assume a victory by either faction that would essentially leave them as the only standing government in the former United States, meaning nothing would stand in their way of reclaiming the whole country, which would pigeonhole the series. Vegas separating the two allows for more stories because it allows both factions to survive. Without Vegas it's one or the other. With Vegas, you have three powerful and influential factions instead of just one.
2. As for leaving it ambiguous regarding House, that's simply because that's where they actually can leave it up to player choice between independent and house. With yes man's new "code to make [him] well..... a little more assertive" there's no practical difference in how vegas would be run between the two, so they wont say.
Also, (and I hate to say this) with the new fallout online game coming out, the creators of that game are going to want as many factions in as many places as possible. From the screen shots it looks like there's mutants in Seattle. Plus we can assume Brotherhood all over the West Coast, Legion in Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, Mormons and Allied Tribes in Utah, NCR in California, Oregon, Baja, Vegas in Nevada, Enclave in Chicago (maybe Brotherhood too, Vegas says Enclave in Chicago, Fallout 3 says Brotherhood in Chicago) and then the East Coast Brotherhood, plus possibly the Commonwealth (that's a stretch though) Things will be trending towards more factions not less.