Fallout: New Vegas > Fallout 3

Post » Mon Dec 05, 2011 10:25 am

Fallout: New Vegas is a breath of fresh air after around 10 years of pretty foo foo RPGs. I am glad to see a game that really hits home on old school "make you think" RPGs. There are alot of things in New Vegas that are straight from Fallout 1 and 2, and I like it! I am sorry for all the gamers that feel that it is not as good as 3 because you can't have a god character by level 15. Nor can you take almost every perk in the game. Again I am so glad to see a game that makes players really think about what they are going to do.
User avatar
Logan Greenwood
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 5:41 pm

Post » Mon Dec 05, 2011 1:54 am

Of course it is more fun than 3.
User avatar
JaNnatul Naimah
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:33 am

Post » Mon Dec 05, 2011 2:07 am

I think most people that love Fallout 3 love it despite being able to be too overpowered, not because of it. Just saying.

Other than that, happy to hear you love New Vegas so much :)
User avatar
Harinder Ghag
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:26 am

Post » Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:56 am

Yes it feels closer to F1 and F2. A whole lot more.
Fallout 3 feels like a mix between Fallout and Elder Scrolls.
So please if theres a F4 please let Obsidian do it!
User avatar
MISS KEEP UR
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:26 am

Post » Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:38 am

Yes it feels closer to F1 and F2. A whole lot more.
Fallout 3 feels like a mix between Fallout and Elder Scrolls.
So please if theres a F4 please let Obsidian do it!


It's extremely close to F2 if you count how separated the community has become :P
User avatar
Elena Alina
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:24 am

Post » Mon Dec 05, 2011 11:01 am

Fallout: New Vegas is a breath of fresh air after around 10 years of pretty foo foo RPGs. I am glad to see a game that really hits home on old school "make you think" RPGs. There are alot of things in New Vegas that are straight from Fallout 1 and 2, and I like it! I am sorry for all the gamers that feel that it is not as good as 3 because you can't have a god character by level 15. Nor can you take almost every perk in the game. Again I am so glad to see a game that makes players really think about what they are going to do.


I don't think it is as good as 3 in some areas, such as random encounters. The Mojave Wasteland is just so damn boring, nothing exciting happens. Its a great game like how Fallout 3 was a great game, but I wouldn't say its better.
User avatar
michael danso
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 9:21 am

Post » Mon Dec 05, 2011 3:48 am

I would hope it's better, I mean they did use FO3 as a template, took fan feed back and added their own twist. If it's not better than FO3 then I would feel real bad for Obsidian. Though I do understand that the exploration in this game svcks hard. Thats too bad, they shouldn't have made it an open world if there is really nothing to explore.
User avatar
DAVId Bryant
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:41 pm

Post » Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:49 am

I actually got kind of emotional about Raul and Cass's stories.


I haven't completed those quests yet, but the conclusion to the bad intel quest at Camp Golf is probably the most poignant moment I've ever experienced in a videogame. Everything comes together there, from the writing, to the voice acting, to how they use something stupidly simple the engine is capable of.
User avatar
Channing
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:05 pm

Post » Mon Dec 05, 2011 7:05 am

Though liking New Vegas plenty, I still like 3 even more. Feel free to pelt me with rotten fruit and declare me an idiot and to list all sorts of "objective" reasons why my opinion is factually incorrect, though.

edit: and yes, my love for the third game has nothing to do with "being able to be a god character by level 15", but is despite this.
User avatar
Alexandra Louise Taylor
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:48 pm

Post » Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:23 am

Though liking New Vegas plenty, I still like 3 even more. Feel free to pelt me with rotten fruit and declare me an idiot and to list all sorts of "objective" reasons why my opinion is factually incorrect, though.

edit: and yes, my love for the third game has nothing to do with "being able to be a god character by level 15", but is despite this.

this
User avatar
carla
 
Posts: 3345
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 8:36 am

Post » Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:13 am

The only issues I have are with people claiming that "Fallout 3" is now "Fallout" when it obviously is not,


Apart from this, I agree with most everything you write. New Vegas is undoubtedly closer in spirit to the original games and it is quite evident that those who entered the series with the first two find it to be a return to form. However -- and this is sadly where we are doomed to disagree -- I am still of the opinion that, for better or worse, "Fallout" is anything that bears that label, that "Fallout" encompasses Tactics and BoS and Fallout 3 and should Bethesda or Obsidian decide tomorrow to release a platform game featuring a Super Mutant jumping over the rooftops of a ruined DC then this would be "Fallout" too.

Why would anybody want to do that?


You might well ask, doesn't mean it doesn't happen though. Such is the way of the internet.
User avatar
Yvonne
 
Posts: 3577
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:05 am

Post » Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:18 am

Finishing the companion quests in FO:NV has been more fulfilling to me than I've had in an RPG in many, many years. I actually got kind of emotional about Raul and Cass's stories. FO3 did nothing but make me slap my head. I can't even begin to describe how much better FO:NV is.


Agreed. Though for me it was Boone and Arcade.

Either way, the writing in most of the quests in this game was phenomenal.
User avatar
Tanya
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 6:01 am

Post » Mon Dec 05, 2011 12:05 am

I like companions like Cass & Veronica more than any companion in any BioWare game since Baldur's Gate 2.

I don't think I would rate the game better than FO3 without the excellent companions and their personal quests.
User avatar
:)Colleenn
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 9:03 am

Post » Mon Dec 05, 2011 3:39 am

Apart from this, I agree with most everything you write. New Vegas is undoubtedly closer in spirit to the original games and it is quite evident that those who entered the series with the first two find it to be a return to form. However -- and this is sadly where we are doomed to disagree -- I am still of the opinion that, for better or worse, "Fallout" is anything that bears that label, that "Fallout" encompasses Tactics and BoS and Fallout 3 and should Bethesda or Obsidian decide tomorrow to release a platform game featuring a Super Mutant jumping over the rooftops of a ruined DC then this would be "Fallout" too.


I have to agree and disagree with you here.
Take the Alien franchise as an example. Alien, Aliens, Alien 3 and Alien Ressurrection
Every one has a diffferent director, all have a very different feel to them. Some are 'better' than others, yet they're all unmistakingly Alien movies.
Alien 3 has a lot more in common with the original than it does with Aliens, but I think it's going to be difficult to find many people who think it is better than Aliens.

That being said, here is where I disagree,

Alien Vs Predator *shivers* :)
User avatar
James Rhead
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:32 am


Return to Fallout Series Discussion