fallout new vegas vehicles : Fallout: New Vegas

» Wed Oct 20, 2010 12:26 am

i am wondering is there well be vehicles in New Vegas .you well need a fast way of traveling around the desert .I heard that there well be vehicles but i don,t know if it is true.can anyone help?

» Wed Oct 20, 2010 1:53 am

for the like...what is it...bill...no...trillionth time:NO VEHICLES!

» Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:01 am

Might be a monorail system, but nothing we can control/drive or ride (like a Brahmin). Any transportation would be like the hand pump train car to get to The Pitt. Or the Steam boat to Point Lookout. There will be no Vehicles for us to control.

» Wed Oct 20, 2010 4:26 am

^ what i meant

» Wed Oct 20, 2010 4:25 am

Why, why not a pack brahmin to carry extra stuff? LV wasent hit directly, there would be vehicles...

» Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:42 am

^^
because the map size won't support GTA style transportation.

» Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:37 am

i am wondering is there well be vehicles in New Vegas .you well need a fast way of traveling around the desert .I heard that there well be vehicles but i don,t know if it is true.can anyone help?

i think there is a vecheil to i read it in some other thing its a chairoit for C legion

» Wed Oct 20, 2010 1:41 am

i think there is a vecheil to i read it in some other thing its a chairoit for C legion

That's from the original van buren concept arts, so it doesn't apply.

» Tue Oct 19, 2010 7:19 pm

wait so oblivion can support horses, hell people 80X faster than horses, but there isn't enough room in nevada for a [censored] apocalyptic plasma powered akira bike? Lame.

» Wed Oct 20, 2010 4:54 am

wait so oblivion can support horses, hell people 80X faster than horses, but there isn't enough room in nevada for a [censored] apocalyptic plasma powered akira bike? Lame.

Replay Oblivion. The horse was terrible.

» Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:19 pm

Replay Oblivion. The horse was terrible.

Though not as bad as in Two Worlds.

As I understand it, Bethesda chose to remove horse riding animations (as well as Bow/Arrow and most melee animations) when they developed the engine for Fallout 3. Whether Obsidian chose to reimplement them is unknown, but since we haven't heard about it, I doubt they have done so.

As for other vehicles, the gamebryo engine (Any engine actually) has to have them coded in at the earlyist stages of development. From what we know, Obsidian haven't been developing New Vegas anywhere nearly long enough to have take the engine apart in order to then start coding in vehicle support. (This is same reason there's no multiplayer support)

» Tue Oct 19, 2010 6:34 pm

Though not as bad as in Two Worlds.

True, but both currently get taken to the woodshed by horses from the mmo, Fallen Earth.

» Wed Oct 20, 2010 7:02 am

you'd think they'd lock this by now

» Tue Oct 19, 2010 11:42 pm

The only vehicle that was ever seen/featured was in FO2... while I agree that it would be nice to have, say, a motorcycle that you get to ride, i'm perfectly content with getting around on two legs and using the fast-travel when needed.

» Wed Oct 20, 2010 1:33 am

ANOTHER VEHICLES THREAD!!!!!1!!!!!
:rofl:

» Tue Oct 19, 2010 11:27 pm

Who cares about transportation? Go play Borderlands!

» Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:19 am

Who cares about transportation? Go play Borderlands!

No, as an RPG the game has to have options for the player. Stop being ignorant. Borderlands is not the game we want to play, we want to play Fallout. Vehicles would give us more options and that makes RPGs more fun. So instead of taking the fun from the players, if you don't like vehicles then don't use them. Simple as that.

» Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:14 am

No, as an RPG the game has to have options for the player. Stop being ignorant. Borderlands is not the game we want to play, we want to play Fallout. Vehicles would give us more options and that makes RPGs more fun. So instead of taking the fun from the players, if you don't like vehicles then don't use them. Simple as that.

The thing is that vehicles would be [censored] terrible with the current engine.

» Tue Oct 19, 2010 9:31 pm

The thing is that vehicles would be [censored] terrible with the current engine.

Yeah, I was just saying that vehicles aren't bad. But with the engine problem, it's true. The Gamebyro engine is bad. Well it's almost OK but still...why not iD tech? That would be great. Maybe for Fallout 4.

» Tue Oct 19, 2010 11:26 pm

No, as an RPG the game has to have options for the player. Stop being ignorant. Borderlands is not the game we want to play, we want to play Fallout. Vehicles would give us more options and that makes RPGs more fun. So instead of taking the fun from the players, if you don't like vehicles then don't use them. Simple as that.

I don't want them wasting time on vehicles so you can jump ramps or do donuts for a few minutes when they could spend time making other features better. If you really wanted to "play fallout" then you wouldn't be asking for cars. Cars do not a fallout make.

» Wed Oct 20, 2010 7:18 am

I don't want them wasting time on vehicles so you can jump ramps or do donuts for a few minutes when they could spend time making other features better. If you really wanted to "play fallout" then you wouldn't be asking for cars. Cars do not a fallout make.

And who are you to judge us?

1. You don't make the game.
2. You don't tell the players what they can and can't do.

Just because they implement vehicle doesn't mean it's going to take away from the core game. Just look at other games...Bad Company 2, GTA, etc. And are those games bad? No, they aren't. With the logic you use then I guess modeling a Radroach is too hard. "Oh noez, the game is going to svck now, it's so hard, I better go kill myself." Hard work pays off. Vehicles always make the game fun...

» Wed Oct 20, 2010 8:06 am

And who are you to judge us?

1. You don't make the game.
2. You don't tell the players what they can and can't do.

Just because they implement vehicle doesn't mean it's going to take away from the core game. Just look at other games...Bad Company 2, GTA, etc. And are those games bad? No, they aren't. With the logic you use then I guess modeling a Radroach is too hard. "Oh noez, the game is going to svck now, it's so hard, I better go kill myself." Hard work pays off. Vehicles always make the game fun...

He's saying that drivable vehicles have never been a big part of the Fallout franchise. Hence "cars do not a Fallout make."

Further, for a game this size, cars are rather impractical. It can work in Fallout 2 where everything's abstracted and there's a worldmap with hundreds and hundreds of miles to cross. It wouldn't work too well in a game this small.

» Tue Oct 19, 2010 9:12 pm

There's supposed to be a monorail, but as for controllable vehicles, there's nothing you can drive. A functioning train is good enough for me.

» Wed Oct 20, 2010 11:28 am

I think it's quite impressive this thread is still alive. Good for you, thread!

By the way, Gary (or Chase, whatever that is), GTA isn't a good game despite of cars... It's Grand Theft AUTO, would have been a bit odd if there were no cars in there, wouldn't it?

It's not that "cars don't fit in Fallout" (they do, actually) it's "this engine would explode with cars in it". If it was possible, it was already in and no one would ever had said "this doesn't fit" people would have just accepted driving their highwayman and would have thought "hey, this is quite cool. I actually wanted to do this since F2".

» Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:23 pm

Fallout two is not the only fallout game with Vehicles. If you want a fallout game with Vehicles I recommend, http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Portal:Fallout_Tactics (Not to be confused with the PS2 game BoS). It has Vehicles. Anyways the OP's Question has been awesered. There will be no vehicles or animals we can control. There might be transportation like the boat to Point Lookout and the hand pump train car to The Pitt.

Maybe Vehicles in Future Fallouts but not this one.