Fallout 4 ...in real life

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2016 10:41 am

So after playing fallout 4 for a few weeks I took a break and checked out a friends old Flickr page. He is into urban exploration which is basically going into old factories and buildings and taking pictures.



https://www.flickr.com/photos/disinteresting/page1



Talk about deja vu... there are even bits of things that look like synths on the second page... and things that look like gun workbenches ..

User avatar
roxxii lenaghan
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 11:53 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2016 5:41 am

I was half expecting to see a cow floating 10 feet off the ground.
User avatar
Adam Kriner
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:30 am

Post » Mon Jan 18, 2016 11:21 pm


Those are some amazing pictures. What kind of camera did your friend use?




That gave me a good laugh, thanks.

User avatar
TWITTER.COM
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 3:15 pm

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2016 2:00 am


Yeah he is a good photographer, has a naturally good eye.. He was using a Cannon EOS 5D II mostly but he uses also range of old cameras he picked up cheap from second hand shops. Urban explorer groups are pretty dedicated bunch, those places aren't the safest to be going into.

User avatar
Hazel Sian ogden
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 7:10 am

Post » Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:12 pm

haha or Piper moving like she is on a trolly with her hands up in the air.

User avatar
luke trodden
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 12:48 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2016 12:08 am

I saw one sideways in the air and would bend down and eat grass like it was normal. I was like "ya that is normal in a Bathesda game"
User avatar
Mari martnez Martinez
 
Posts: 3500
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:39 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2016 10:32 am

He should go to Detroit. they have places that look straight out of the game- http://images.fineartamerica.com/images-medium-large/detroit-abandoned-buildings-joe-gee.jpg

User avatar
willow
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 9:43 pm

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2016 8:23 am

ya, their is a reason they did not mention Detroit on the news at the beginning, what would nuclear bombs do to it that time hasn't already done? It would probably look better.
User avatar
Verity Hurding
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 1:29 pm

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2016 2:17 am

:lol:


So true...it already has raiders and scavengers too.

User avatar
Jessie Rae Brouillette
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 9:50 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2016 1:06 am

wow thats pretty fallout-ish too

User avatar
LuBiE LoU
 
Posts: 3391
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 4:43 pm

Post » Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:16 pm

Cool pics, your friend does good contrast ;)

User avatar
Emily Martell
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:41 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2016 11:19 am

Very cool! So many small areas of the world you just don't see

User avatar
Maddy Paul
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:20 pm

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2016 10:05 am

Or Chernobyl. Although the biggest visual inaccuracy of the Fallout world(s), is the lack of vegetation. The thing that strikes you first about a site that has been abandoned to nature for any period of time is how nature, and plants in particular, quickly conquer and overgrow all. Plants are far more adaptive to radiation than most animals are. The world of Fallout 3 & 4, where all the trees are still dead after 200 years and only low shrubs and grasses exist sparsely, is total BS. But most people would get hopelessly lost in a gameworld overgrown with plants, and of course the extra vegetation would kill most people's graphics capabilities.

User avatar
des lynam
 
Posts: 3444
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 4:07 pm

Post » Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:04 pm

Recommend reading One Second After, which is a short novel about how the world would look after a massive EMP attack by the North Koreans and Iranians. While the devastation of ground-based nuclear attacks is lacking, the book lays out in vivid detail how a massive EMP strike would all but destroy the U.S. and devastate its population.

User avatar
Dan Stevens
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 5:00 pm

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2016 6:47 am

We rely heavily on technology for our food, water, transportation, etc. Without it, a pretty significant percentage of the population would die off within a few months. It would not be a pretty scene.

User avatar
Alexander Horton
 
Posts: 3318
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:19 pm

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2016 6:14 am


Ill pass that on to him, he seems to be doing people more and more now, those were taken about 5 years ago





Your not wrong .. open my eyes to whats in the city we live behind the fences.

User avatar
anna ley
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:04 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2016 8:42 am

One second after would make a cool game.

User avatar
Tracey Duncan
 
Posts: 3299
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:32 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2016 11:01 am

Fantastic images.


Thanks for sharing.

User avatar
Peetay
 
Posts: 3303
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:33 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2016 12:54 am


Not that I disagree with you but if you take Chernobyl it was one spot but everything around it had healthy vegetation so it was easy for these plants to quickly come and settle in the incident area. In Fallout it seems much of the planet was devastated, so the impact would be felt on a larger scale on plants too. But yeah, probably not to the extent that is shown in the game.

User avatar
Mrs. Patton
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:00 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2016 1:26 am

Yes, vegetation come back fast, in Chernobyl you have trees inside houses.


The Detroit image looked very fallout because it had no vegitation. else you only get this in very dry areas.


However if fallout looked like Oblivion with new town and lots of overgrown ruins around it would not have the right feeling.

User avatar
jessica Villacis
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:03 pm

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2016 7:44 am

with the current state of the US power grid being as it is, it wouldn't even take anything too massive.



using chernobyl isn't very accurate of an example of what would happen in the case of a global nuke war.

Chernobyl has a perimeter- where seeds, pollinators, and animals from outside can re introduce life, once they come into the area. In a global nuke scenario, there isn't that luxury.
User avatar
Dominic Vaughan
 
Posts: 3531
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 1:47 pm

Post » Mon Jan 18, 2016 11:21 pm

So what does this have to do with a forum for Fallout 4 ? I'm sorry is this just a general forum to talk about anything people want? Where are the moderators.

User avatar
Bereket Fekadu
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:41 pm

Post » Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:11 pm

really?
User avatar
alicia hillier
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 2:57 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2016 6:39 am


I know right? Kind of tired of the bleak setting, I would love to see something else besides "oh look, dead world because nature apparently can't even do nature right, what a noob". Vines spreading rapidly within buildings, trees bursting through the cracks in the concrete, weeds and fields as high as a human, blowing in the wind. It would definitely give us a reason to have unique plant enemies such as spore carriers that ambush through camouflage and consume the player with a bite.

User avatar
Hannah Barnard
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 9:42 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:29 am

lol this ^

User avatar
Dan Scott
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:45 am

Next

Return to Fallout 4