Fallout 4 or Wastelands 2?

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 11:02 pm

I never felt FO 3 was TES, especially since I've played that series from Arena and other than Daggerfall, not largely a fan. Bethesda's consistently up there for me as far as RPG makers go.
Truthfully I've only played Oblivion and I can clearly see the similarities between that game and Fallout 3. What Bethesda essentially did was take some of the plot devices and interesting factions from the previous Fallout's and combined them with Oblivion's mechanics and put a post(barely)-apocalyptic coat of paint over all of it. Fallout 3 is, essentially, a hiking simulator, its primary focus being in the exploration. This is what Oblivion was about, but it was never what Fallout was about.
User avatar
Angel Torres
 
Posts: 3553
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:08 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 3:19 pm

Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm going with Wasteland 2. There's just something about it that has me interested...
User avatar
Sakura Haruno
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 7:23 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 9:34 pm

Just pledged my 15$. Wasteland 2 sounds like its going to be a blast, and I also want to support this type of game development. We need to stick it to publishers like EA and Ubisoft and show them that they aren't the sole power in these markets.
User avatar
yessenia hermosillo
 
Posts: 3545
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:31 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 11:28 pm

Just pledged my 15$. Wasteland 2 sounds like its going to be a blast, and I also want to support this type of game development. We need to stick it to publishers like EA and Ubisoft and show them that they aren't the sole power in these markets.
Someone needs to steal Starflight from them.
User avatar
Sam Parker
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 3:10 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 1:47 pm

Grrr...I really wish I had the cash to get the 50$ version, but I'm pretty strapped for cash right now.

Freaking cost of gas is insane.
User avatar
Amy Gibson
 
Posts: 3540
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:11 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 7:47 pm

Grrr...I really wish I had the cash to get the 50$ version, but I'm pretty strapped for cash right now.

Freaking cost of gas is insane.
I do too. I wanted the shirt one for $150... I could only go in for the lowest amount.
User avatar
Tamara Dost
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 12:20 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 11:26 am

I do too. I wanted the shirt one for $150... I could only go in for the lowest amount.
I might try convincing my brother to lend me the cash, and in return he can have the digital download copy.
User avatar
Dewayne Quattlebaum
 
Posts: 3529
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:29 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 4:15 pm

They take donation money by letter?

I don't like making money transactions online.

Well I could just look up their company address and such.
User avatar
Phillip Hamilton
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 3:07 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 10:24 pm

They take donation money by letter?

I don't like making money transactions online.

Well I could just look up their company address and such.
It's done via Amazon payments, so that's pretty secure.

Alternatively, there's a Paypal option as well.
User avatar
sam smith
 
Posts: 3386
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:55 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 7:16 pm

They take donation money by letter?

I don't like making money transactions online.

Well I could just look up their company address and such.

You could go to the Kickstarter page and hit the "send message" link. It goes to someone at inXile and they'll be able to help you out.
User avatar
mishionary
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:19 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 5:21 pm

You could go to the Kickstarter page and hit the "send message" link. It goes to someone at inXile and they'll be able to help you out.
I'll try that.
User avatar
Matthew Aaron Evans
 
Posts: 3361
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:59 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 8:58 pm

I'm surprised to see the Fallout 4 has only 10 vote leading. Perhaps there's still is few of you who like things with some depth.

Also, for the people who do not think this is real:
http://www.gamesas.com/topic/1365926-wasteland-2-kickstarter-now-featuring-chris-avellone/page__st__30
User avatar
daniel royle
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 8:44 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 8:38 pm

The lay offs had to do with Interplay being driven into the ground, if Fallout was a 'dead' franchise, no one would have bought the rights. As for your logic on 'test run', that's just ridiculous. You don't take a game with a devoted fanbase and go 'Ya kno, letz jus thro sum stuf tugetha an say 'DID OUR BES LOL' '. You take a serious approach to it. As far as I recall, the developers DID do a serious approach to their interpretation of the setting, but they focused so much on world building, they neglected a complex and well written plot, which is what drew people to Fallout to begin with. While I don't believe Fallout 3 is a bad Fallout, just a poorly written one due to poor interpretation of the developers.

Cooool, anyhow cant wait for fallout 4 wohoooo :D
User avatar
Big mike
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:38 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 2:24 pm

As far as I recall, the developers DID do a serious approach to their interpretation of the setting, but they focused so much on world building, they neglected a complex and well written plot, which is what drew people to Fallout to begin with. While I don't believe Fallout 3 is a bad Fallout, just a poorly written one due to poor interpretation of the developers.

My theory is that Fallout 3 is the way it is because Bethesda just doesn't know how to make any other kind of game. Thus "Oblivion with guns" :shrug: And why i keep referring to Fallout 4 as "Skyrim with Guns", until i'm proven wrong :wink:
User avatar
Petr Jordy Zugar
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:10 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 6:58 pm

My theory is that Fallout 3 is the way it is because Bethesda just doesn't know how to make any other kind of game. Thus "Oblivion with guns" :shrug: And why i keep referring to Fallout 4 as "Skyrim with Guns", until i'm proven wrong :wink:
Pretty much, they can only make a big world, even that is starting to crumble. Like how dungeons in skyrim were linear, always had a convenient cave in to funnel me in one direction.

They cant do moral choices to save their life, even when you have one you can agree with. They completely [censored] it up (broken steel).
I cant see Bethesda doing well, other devs are starting to make big worlds, not as much interaction as betehsda, but eventually they will be surpassed. (depending on your oppinion, they may have been overtaken already).
User avatar
m Gardner
 
Posts: 3510
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:08 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 11:12 am

Pretty much, they can only make a big world, even that is starting to crumble. Like how dungeons in skyrim were linear, always had a convenient cave in to funnel me in one direction.
I think their big worlds are starting to lack a bit as well. They are damm lucky they had an awesome lore department for Daggerfall and Morrowind because that is the only thing TES has going for it now.
User avatar
Spaceman
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:09 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 12:51 am

I think their big worlds are starting to lack a bit as well. They are damm lucky they had an awesome lore department for Daggerfall and Morrowind because that is the only thing TES has going for it now.
Only played Oblivion and Skyrim, didnt really care about the lore.
Allthough I have learned since then they retconned some stuff in Oblivion. Like how Cyrodil was supposed to be a jungle iirc.
User avatar
Damned_Queen
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 5:18 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 11:49 pm

Double post
User avatar
Anna Krzyzanowska
 
Posts: 3330
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:08 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 8:09 pm


Truthfully I've only played Oblivion and I can clearly see the similarities between that game and Fallout 3. What Bethesda essentially did was take some of the plot devices and interesting factions from the previous Fallout's and combined them with Oblivion's mechanics and put a post(barely)-apocalyptic coat of paint over all of it. Fallout 3 is, essentially, a hiking simulator, its primary focus being in the exploration. This is what Oblivion was about, but it was never what Fallout was about.

I'll put it this way- Bethesda is a lot more, and deeply, Ultima inspired than Cain, Taylor, and Anderson were.

Ultimately yes that's a large paradigme for BGS but as Oblivion's the first work you played then the close coming of FO3 your missing out on the fact that it's the lifeblood BGS has run on since 94'. The alienation of Oblivion largely was the weak writing due both to BGS not being the best writers and full voiced game for the first time in the main series, and the standard fantasy vision for Cyrodiil.

Or it could be the exploration, but again from Arena it's always been about exploration in a 3D world from a 1st person perspective, albeit not focused on you til Daggerfall.

What I'm trying to reach at is while FO1 is from first glance a whole different beast, not quite so at a closer look. Not to suggest FO3 is anything satisfactory, -As a Fallout fan.-

I don't want to undermine them or praise them to the heavens. Especially with the long time fans like me crowd I like to instill that Bethesda has key strengths and key weaknesses like all studios.

Now obviously even if something like had Van Buren happened I'd still be bitter and claim FO1 as tops. I'm a hard really devoted fan as well. I partly hate Avellone and Co. At release I threw my copy of 2 away.

FO3 is a distinct shift and 4 will continue that. I'm not going to pin BGS games as crap though. To each their own.

As to the development process, I lay part of the blame on Mr. Dark Brotherhood Emil. Half the things we don't like is due to his need for badassery.
User avatar
Kit Marsden
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:19 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 11:54 am

I'll put it this way- Bethesda is a lot more, and deeply, Ultima inspired than Cain, Taylor, and Anderson were.

Ultimately yes that's a large paradigme for BGS but as Oblivion's the first work you played then the close coming of FO3 your missing out on the fact that it's the lifeblood BGS has run on since 94'. The alienation of Oblivion largely was the weak writing due both to BGS not being the best writers and full voiced game for the first time in the main series, and the standard fantasy vision for Cyrodiil.

Or it could be the exploration, but again from Arena it's always been about exploration in a 3D world from a 1st person perspective, albeit not focused on you til Daggerfall.

What I'm trying to reach at is while FO1 is from first glance a whole different beast, not quite so at a closer look. Not to suggest FO3 is anything satisfactory, -As a Fallout fan.-

I don't want to undermine them or praise them to the heavens. Especially with the long time fans like me crowd I like to instill that Bethesda has key strengths and key weaknesses like all studios.

Now obviously even if something like had Van Buren happened I'd still be bitter and claim FO1 as tops. I'm a hard really devoted fan as well. I partly hate Avellone and Co. At release I threw my copy of 2 away.

FO3 is a distinct shift and 4 will continue that. I'm not going to pin BGS games as crap though. To each their own.

As to the development process, I lay part of the blame on Mr. Dark Brotherhood Emil. Half the things we don't like is due to his need for badassery.
For all of my talk of Bethesda's faults and mistakes, I actually do have a hope that they could(stress that 'could') make a decent Fallout game if they take more checks from Obsidian and New Vegas. Overall I would still much prefer to see Obsidian develop the next Fallout with no interference, but if Bethesda is doing then I would like to see them something new. I am actually interested in what new creative ideas Bethesda can come up in the Fallout universe...as long as they stay on the east coast. There is no need for them to venture into the lore-heavy region of the west.
User avatar
Mark Hepworth
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 1:51 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 12:34 am

Fallout 4. I love 1st person exploration games, preferably open world.
User avatar
Claire
 
Posts: 3329
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 4:01 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 6:29 pm

Fallout 4.
User avatar
Strawberry
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 11:08 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 3:55 pm

I'm pretty much the ambassador for fo3 on these forums , I love it in a physically abused house wife sort of way it has it's flaws but I love it but not even I can agree with your statement fonv is technically better.
What I meant to say was that I enjoyed FO3 more then FONV. mostly because I don't like the idea of not being able to continue the game after I beat it.
User avatar
Nicole Coucopoulos
 
Posts: 3484
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 4:09 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 11:17 am

What I meant to say was that I enjoyed FO3 more then FONV. mostly because I don't like the idea of not being able to continue the game after I beat it.
I never understood the point of continuing an RPG after I have completed it. Whatever I feel I should do, I do before the last quest because when I've finished the main quest, I have finished that character.
User avatar
lisa nuttall
 
Posts: 3277
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 1:33 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 10:23 pm

I have played Wasteland and it was awesome and I will support Brian Fargo for that by pledging $55 or more for "THE INTERNATIONAL FRIENDLY ALL DIGITAL PACKAGE! You get one digital copy of the game DRM free for PC, Mac or Linux, digital soundtrack, digital concept art book, episodic novella part 1 and 2, and premiere access to an early playable beta on steam. This comes with no physical goods to help with VAT, duty and shipping costs for our international fans!".
User avatar
victoria gillis
 
Posts: 3329
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 7:50 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout Series Discussion