Fallout 4 who should make it?

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 11:47 am

I say obsidian sure there games are buggy but they offer what fallout 3 did not. There open and you can complete them in different ways unlike f3. I also like how open they are.
User avatar
Sara Lee
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:40 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 2:22 am

Obsidian but it will be Bethesda. I am just hoping Bethesda will learn from Obsidian when it comes to making a Fallout. I don't want Fallout 4 to be a TES dressed up to look like Fallout.
User avatar
Suzie Dalziel
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 8:19 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 3:13 am

I'd rather see Obsidian make it as they seem to have a better grasp on Fallout, but we all know Bethesda is going to be the one to develop it.
User avatar
Albert Wesker
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 11:17 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 3:22 am

Bethesda, though in a perfect world with Obsidian pitching in on the writing.
User avatar
Music Show
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:53 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 12:14 am

Obsidian but it will be Bethesda. I am just hoping Bethesda will learn from Obsidian when it comes to making a Fallout. I don't want Fallout 4 to be a TES dressed up to look like Fallout.


This, since we only get to choose between these 2.
User avatar
Rik Douglas
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 1:40 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 4:12 pm

How about both? :celebration:

If nothing else though, I'd prefer Bethesda, they just need to incorporate some of the improvements from New Vegas.
User avatar
Ruben Bernal
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 5:58 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 3:21 pm

I'd rather have Obsidian and Bethesda cooperate on Fallout 4. Help eachother eliminate their bad sides, because Obsidian is good at what Bethesda is not and vice versa.
User avatar
naome duncan
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:36 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 3:23 am

Both but Bethesda = for enjoyment and sheer fun Obsidian = coherent world and writing(although Bethesda make better game worlds).
User avatar
Lauren Denman
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 10:29 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 11:04 am

Infinity Ward, after Activision buys everyone out....
User avatar
Blaine
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 4:24 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 10:45 am

I'd rather see Obsidian get to do a Fallout game without any restraints.
Like, how would Obsidian do a Fallout game if they didn't have to do it along the same design as FO3?
Would it have map nodes again?
TB system?
Isometric view?

So with Bethesda, I know what kinda game they will make, an ES total conversion mod.
But with Obsidian, I dunno, it'd be far more interesting to see what they would come up with if they didn't have to do a total conversion mod for FO3 or Skyrim.

So I'm with Obsidian.
User avatar
Bones47
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 11:15 pm

Post » Mon May 16, 2011 11:52 pm

I'd rather see Obsidian get to do a Fallout game without any restraints.
Like, how would Obsidian do a Fallout game if they didn't have to do it along the same design as FO3?
Would it have map nodes again?
TB system?
Isometric view?

So with Bethesda, I know what kinda game they will make, an ES total conversion mod.
But with Obsidian, I dunno, it'd be far more interesting to see what they would come up with if they didn't have to do a total conversion mod for FO3 or Skyrim.

So I'm with Obsidian.

I know what would happen they would lose 70% of there audience overnight if they ditched the "mod for FO3".
User avatar
R.I.P
 
Posts: 3370
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 8:11 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 12:48 am

Mebbe the two studios can form some kind of super-studio... Employees from both studios come together to establish a Fallout-centric dev team that takes up the sole reins of the franchise... Mebbe some of those guys working on FOOL would even be poached to join up.
User avatar
Lyndsey Bird
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:57 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 10:57 am

Obsidian has a much better grasp on what Fallout is...It'd be like somebody making a book that contradicts everything about Dragonlance and saying: "I was told I could publish this by WotC, so therefore my book is more valid than Weiss and Hickman's, even if it turns Raistlin into a paladin and Tanis into an Orc Fighter!"

Will Bethesda do it? Yes. I think they should hire Obsidian for writers and Bethesda should develop the map.

I can see it now...

"Vault 13...it exists," says a companion.

"My ancestor came from here," replies the protagonist. "I need the data files from the command terminal." And then the protagonist delves into a multi-level dungeon filled with 'vault dwellers'.
User avatar
Nicola
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:57 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 2:42 am

I know what would happen they would lose 70% of there audience overnight if they ditched the "mod for FO3".

Hardly think 70% would leave but even so I'm certain that 70% other kinds of players would love it.
User avatar
Love iz not
 
Posts: 3377
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 8:55 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 6:48 am

C'mon people, don't he hatin', I know you want a joint effort of Bethesda and Obsidian. :fallout:
User avatar
Kim Bradley
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:00 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 12:17 pm

I'd like them both, and InXile, to all work together on it.
User avatar
Dezzeh
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 2:49 am

Post » Mon May 16, 2011 11:55 pm

C'mon people, don't he hatin', I know you want a joint effort of Bethesda and Obsidian. :fallout:

Actually, I don't.
Bethesda will want to stick to the sandbox map, which they are good at.
But I personally don't want a sandbox map, I want a map node system.
So since what Bethesda is good at is something I don't really want in a Fallout game I can't say I want a joint project.
If there's no other way though and it "has to be" a sandbox game then yes to Obsidian as they are the only saving grace for the franchise.
But it will end up being another "the best out of a bad situation" game just like NV was.
User avatar
Alexis Estrada
 
Posts: 3507
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 6:22 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 8:43 am

Actually, I don't.
Bethesda will want to stick to the sandbox map, which they are good at.
But I personally don't want a sandbox map, I want a map node system.
So since what Bethesda is good at is something I don't really want in a Fallout game I can't say I want a joint project.
If there's no other way though and it "has to be" a sandbox game then yes to Obsidian as they are the only saving grace for the franchise.
But it will end up being another "the best out of a bad situation" game just like NV was.


Yeah, for you.
User avatar
GLOW...
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:40 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 2:47 am

Yeah, for you.

For me. ;)
User avatar
Mylizards Dot com
 
Posts: 3379
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 1:59 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 4:30 am

I'd prefer Obsidian, but its going to be Bethesda.
User avatar
Zosia Cetnar
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:35 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 11:16 am

Hardly think 70% would leave but even so I'm certain that 70% other kinds of players would love it.

What 70% would jumpt on the turn based isometric band wagon when crap low intelligence games like cod run rampant.
User avatar
Charles Mckinna
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 6:51 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 12:08 pm

I would rather I make it. No option for me. Poll is racist.

-Gunny out.
User avatar
Kortniie Dumont
 
Posts: 3428
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 7:50 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 4:30 am

Still waiting on a "Both" option. Poll is very racist.
User avatar
Justin
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:32 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 10:47 am

There is no "both" option

Poll is racist
User avatar
Matt Bee
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 5:32 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 11:41 am

I agree I think obsidian betshedsa and inxile should use their rings, when the 3 powers combine they summon the world champion CAPTIAN PLANET!!.... okay maybe not all of you were kids in the 90's....


Okay to be a little bit more serious I agree I think they should get the best of both studios, errr well I guess 3, and take best aspects of fallout 3 and NV.

I agree there needs to be a both option the poll is racist.
User avatar
Gemma Flanagan
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 6:34 pm

Next

Return to Fallout Series Discussion