I'm quite disappointed with the MP, even if i mostly appreciate the overall game.

Everything is based on speed + weapon have lots of area effects.

MP is all about "one-shot".

My point is "speed+low survivability+lots of area weapon" implies the lack off shot-precision and overall tactics need.

I still prefer BF3 :/.

Yeah they speed up the game 2x form Crysis 2. Not a huge fan of it by any means but i am slowing adapting......

To each their own, I played the Battlefield 3 BETA game and died almost instantly, by some random sniper who was camping. When I started camping in the subway by the train, I got some nice kills, but overall the MP was just boring, cause by the time you find someone, I am struggling to not fall asleep.

Crysis 2 and 3 causes you to have an adrenaline rush.

I understand what you mean. But i feel like "instant-action" kills the team-work, the tactic thinking.

I don't want to make any pub for BF3 which have flaws, but the slower-pace make positionning and tactic thinking (the use of smoke grenade for example) way more necessary than in Crysis 3.

Still i've some pretty decent crash site game in which i've fun. (Positionning is a little more important in the kind of game).

Just had another thought:

League of Legends, which is the most played PC game of the world is a 5vs5 game that last for 20 to 50 minutes.

Instant-action isn't what most people want imo.
Btw i'm sure that there's possibilities for a more brain-using MP for Crysis 3.

Instant-action isn't what most people want imo.
Btw i'm sure that there's possibilities for a more brain-using MP for Crysis 3.

Not if you're pandering to the COD crowd.

Everything is based on speed + weapon have lots of area effects.
AD 1 well that's Crysis for, it's about speed
AD 2 sure all assault rifles have area of effect so do snipers. Shotgun in all games have aoe so do explosives.
Your argument is invalid