2 Female Companions? Really

Post » Sun Nov 29, 2015 2:14 pm

Im sorry to [censored] about this but really? just a snotty reporter with a seriously [censored] sense of justice and journalism and a [censored] drug addict cage fighter?

Dont get me wrong, piper i could like if she wasnt such a silver tounged [censored], and Cait would be cool (very cool) if she didnt look so much like a damn drug addict. Also the fact that she hates you being nice to people, [censored] really?

User avatar
Vahpie
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:07 pm

Post » Sun Nov 29, 2015 12:04 pm

Are you saying you think two is too many? Or not enough? Or that there should be more male companions? Or what?

User avatar
Horror- Puppe
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 11:09 am

Post » Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:59 pm

I think they mean there should have been more inanimate objects as companions. Perhaps a traffic cone with a misplaced self sense of righteousness?

User avatar
dav
 
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 3:46 pm

Post » Sun Nov 29, 2015 2:46 pm

I think person who made this post is saying there should be better and more likeable female character instead of the stuck up [censored] and the cokehead
User avatar
Richard
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:50 pm

Post » Sun Nov 29, 2015 7:03 pm

More fembots! Just one isn't enough, even if she's a Ms. Handy! :)

User avatar
Julie Serebrekoff
 
Posts: 3359
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:41 am

Post » Sun Nov 29, 2015 5:23 am

Seems like a fair representation of the females of Boston.

No but really ,what do you want from these guys? If they put 2 females companions they are chauvenistic pigs according to one group of people, if they put just 2male companions they are tryng to brain wash the customers with sixual connotations by another group. Simple fact s they can't win so they have 2 options: 1) Create companions that are 'pure' inspiraition, as a designer I know that at certain moments it just becomes clear what should be where and when and how. 2) assess the market groups and offend the smallest one.

User avatar
Bee Baby
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 4:47 am

Post » Sun Nov 29, 2015 5:26 pm

I kinda have to agree here. Skyrim had all sorts of people. I've been with Piper for two days and I'm already missing the simplicity of Dogmeat. Dogmeat doesn't judge me for my wrong doings! :ph34r:

User avatar
Jesus Duran
 
Posts: 3444
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 12:16 am

Post » Sun Nov 29, 2015 11:40 am

I don't like any of the companions at all really (codsworth is the only decent one) they're all just FO3 and skyrim companion levels of nothing. At least I have a nice perk that makes being a loner much more appealing outside from the fact that the companions svck.

User avatar
Setal Vara
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:24 pm

Post » Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:56 am

Am I wrong in assuming that there are more men playing Fallout 4 than women? My experience in gaming (non electronic) is that Women tend not to like games with a lot of conflict. There are exceptions but that seems like a good general rule. I would think FO4 would be similar. So if you DO have mostly men playing and you put romance in the game, shouldn't there BE more women companions? There are in Skyrim right?

And if you're playing a good character (and I'd like to hope most do since it might say something about humans) the only real choice is Piper. I'd like to repeat someone's post here that Willow should be ported from her player created Mod to the actual FO4 game.
User avatar
Sunny Under
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 5:31 pm

Post » Sun Nov 29, 2015 6:45 pm

There is an http://www.gamesas.com/topic/1549248-does-beth-not-want-us-playing-as-straight-male-characters/for this discussion in the spoilers section. Feel free to join the discussion there.

User avatar
Andrew
 
Posts: 3521
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 1:44 am


Return to Fallout 4