Well first of all, nobody mentioned Opera in that comparison - only Chrome, Firefox and IE were featured.
Fixing the race now are we?
Second, it was not my argument that Chrome is a better browser than Firefox, it was just me who found some data upon which that conclusion can be based. I think that Firefox's great AdBlock Plus far outweighs the minor difference in standard compliance.
The difference I am saying between Chrome's Acid3 and Firefox's is too small to properly call chrome a "technically better" browser. Some minor changes that many users make can easily cause a few points lost in Acid3. I remember for the longest time, when changing what Javascript can and can't do to my browser window, I was docked like 4 points on Acid3, so I'd argue that such a small difference can't be used to make a claim even for "technically better". I'd say at least a "grade level" 10 points is necessary for "technically better" to be claimed.
Third, the difference between 94 and 20 is nowhere near "small".
I didn't say it was. I was, of course, referring to Chrome and Firefox.