First City revealed.

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 1:49 pm

True that, a very unique and iconic city that diverges itself from the common fantasy towns we see in RPGs nowadays.

I don't like the new Dwemer "style" though. It doesn't look Dwemer-ish... I was expecting something more steampunk-ish. Maybe it's interiors looks like actual Dwemer architecture, though.



Why can't different Dwemer regions have different architecture? Look at the Hlaalu buildings compared to the Telvanni! They are completely different from each other. Why can't the Dwemer in one place such as Skyrim be different then the ones on Vvardenfell? It makes sense to me.

Edit: Basically what Sleign said :P
User avatar
jadie kell
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 3:54 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 4:17 pm

The exact quote was 'Skyrim is filled with crumbing ruins and ancient cities.'

There were numerous clues that it was a city that everyone just chose to overlook.

1. The caption on the picture.
2. The sentence in the article that talked about cities look like they had been lived in for thousands of years.
3. The shear size of it.
4. The fact that there is no evidence in the picture of destruction, just wear and tear.
5. Both roofs are still intact.
6. The fact that it looks similar to cities in Europe and the Middle East that have been lived in for thousands of years.

I'm not sure calling a city that has been inhabited since the the early days of life on the continent is a ruin. I'm sure all those people that live in the Middle East and Europe wouldn't appreciate you calling their 2000+ year old cities ruins. I don't think I've ever heard someone call Rome a ruin. Sure, it has ruins, but that doesn't make it a ruin.

All of the clues were there, but just a few people seemed to put them all together.


Well it was worse for wear and Markarth Side wasn't even one of the 5 main cities that were considered because it was a lesser known city compared to others. For all we knew, Markarth Side had been abandoned in the past two centuries or destroyed in the war. Also, the label Markarth could also mean it was near the area of Markarth Side, it didn't mean it was it.
User avatar
Kaylee Campbell
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:17 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 2:44 pm

Well it was worse for wear and Markarth Side wasn't even one of the 5 main cities that were considered because it was a lesser known city compared to others.


When was it said that there would only be 5 cities? I might have missed it. Was it in the magazine?
User avatar
Ronald
 
Posts: 3319
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:16 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 6:52 am

There are way more than 5 cities... it's just that 5 in particular were called "massive" I don't even remember where it came from now...
User avatar
Sabrina Steige
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 9:51 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 2:33 pm

There are way more than 5 cities... it's just that 5 in particular were called "massive" I don't even remember where it came from now...


Thanks, but does anyone know where it was actually said? It would be good to have it up here anyways.

By the way, what is this speak of Markarth? It was probably mentioned already but this picture here is labeled: Markarth021.jpg

http://static.zenimax.com/bethblog/upload/2011/01/Markarth021.jpg
User avatar
chirsty aggas
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 9:23 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 8:40 pm

Thanks, but does anyone know where it was actually said? It would be good to have it up here anyways.


On page 49 it was said that there was 5 "massive" cities which is what most people tried to guess. As for there are more than 5 cities, we can't be sure of that at all and there is definitely not way more than 5 cities, there are only 7 major cities in Skyrim and when they say 5 "massive" cities, it is implied that there are only 5 major cities seeing as how it would be logical to say how many cities there were. Now there are many nice sized villages, there aren't a lot of cities in Skyrim, which is fine of course.

By the way, what is this speak of Markarth? It was probably mentioned already but this picture here is labeled: Markarth021.jpg


Markarth Side is a city in Skyrim.
User avatar
marie breen
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:50 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 5:29 am

There are way more than 5 cities... it's just that 5 in particular were called "massive" I don't even remember where it came from now...


I was about to point that out. People keep thinking this is one of the 5 biggest cities, but all he said was "major", which doesn't mean that. For all we know (though this is probably exaggeration) there are 15 or so cities but only 5 are "massive".
User avatar
michael flanigan
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:33 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 5:22 am

I was about to point that out. People keep thinking this is one of the 5 biggest cities, but all he said was "major", which doesn't mean that. For all we know (and from the look of the map) there are 15 or so major cities but only 5 are "massive".


There would only be a max of 7 major cities if there is going to be more than 5.
User avatar
Laura Cartwright
 
Posts: 3483
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:12 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 8:28 am

There would only be a max of 7 major cities if there is going to be more than 5.


You don't actually know that, though. I mean it is 200 years later. Anyway, I seriously doubt that Markarth Side is one of the top 5. On the map we got, every (unless they changed it's location extremely dramatically) place that could be Markarth Side took up 4 blocks, while some other cities took up 9. The towns also take up 4 blocks, so it is difficult to say exactly what size it is (I guess everything just over 1 is 4, and everything just over 4 is 9), but it would seem to at least not be one of the biggest.
User avatar
Theodore Walling
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:48 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 10:18 am

You don't actually know that, though. I mean it is 200 years later. Anyway, I seriously doubt that Markarth Side is one of the top 5. On the map we got, every (unless they changed it's location extremely dramatically) place that could be Markarth Side took up 4 blocks, while some other cities took up 9. The towns also take up 4 blocks, so it is difficult to say exactly what size it is (I guess everything just over 1 is 4, and everything just over 4 is 9), but it would seem to at least not be one of the biggest.


Yeah but the scale of the block map isn't fact of how big it really is.

Gratz on Disciple btw, where is your Zim avatar!?!? Deathnote isn't as good as an Invader Zim avatar!
User avatar
cosmo valerga
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:21 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 10:32 am

Yeah but the scale of the block map isn't fact of how big it really is.

Gratz on Disciple btw, where is your Zim avatar!?!? Deathnote isn't as good as an Invader Zim avatar!


Yes, it is. It's better. L is cool. I was tired of Zim's manic personality and wanted to adopt a cooler, calmer style (I dunno, but when I read people's posts, I imagine it from the perspective of their avatar if they have one).

Anyway, the only reason they would give them those block sizes would be because to the nearest square (of blocks eg 1, 4, 9, 16), it's how much space it takes up. It's possible they changed it later, but I think it's a pretty good indication. By the way, there are actually 8 cities. I just checked. Solitude, Dawnstar, Winterhold, Windhelm, Markarth Side (or Karthwasten in some maps), Falkreath, Riften and Whiterun.
User avatar
Rex Help
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:52 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 7:06 am

cites the size of daggerfall cites would be good
User avatar
Loane
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:35 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 7:01 pm

By the way, what is this speak of Markarth?
Markarth Side was a little hamlet suburb of Snowhawk in Arena.
User avatar
Hayley O'Gara
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:53 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 10:42 am

Map based on Arena
http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/1641/skmapxyzpoliticalif7.jpg
As you can see, Bethesda moved a lot of things around.
User avatar
teeny
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:51 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 3:48 pm

Meh. I'd first like an explanation on why that Dwemer ruin doesn't look like a Dwemer ruin. :tongue:


Maybe this isn't actually a Dwemer ruin we're looking at. Or maybe Bethesda *gasp* used a different design for the Dwemer ruins in Skyrim! Oh no! Unthinkable! You know, the way things look can change between games at times, especially when you're dealing with archetecture, which would naturally be influenced by where a structure is built. No one said all Dwemer ruins across Tamriel need to look exactly the same, in fact, the Dwemer ruin in Tribunal looked different from the ones on Vvardenfell, despite also being a Dwemer ruin.

I didn't expect that to be a major city, though, I had assumed it was just a ruin, if it is a city, though, I hope the reason for the lack of people there is because Bethesda had just designed the location and not finished populating it at the time the screenshot was taken, because it looks pretty deserted as it is.

cites the size of daggerfall cites would be good


I somehow doubt we're going to see that, especially since the map isn't going to be as big as Daggerfall's, do you really think Bethesda would make such large cities on a map that might not be any bigger than Oblivion's?
User avatar
Britta Gronkowski
 
Posts: 3475
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 3:14 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 4:44 pm

Doesnt look like a city to start in or even a city at all I would rather Riften I think its called? But that seems more appropriate
User avatar
Claudia Cook
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 10:22 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 11:19 am

Doesnt look like a city to start in or even a city at all I would rather Riften I think its called? But that seems more appropriate


It does look like a city (carved in stone, like some ones from http://melstravel.com/img/turkey/CliffDwellings1.jpg), only in a Nordic/Dwemer? fashion, of course.
User avatar
Adrian Powers
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:44 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 5:44 am

We have already seen the map, and there are many more than 5 cities. There are around 23-25 multicell settlements/major locations scattered across the map. Pete didn't say anything about the 5 major cities and he didn't even indicate the screen was a city, hecwas just asked how large the cities would be and he suggested looking at Makarth and thinking for yourself. Basically, he means that the cities will be way more impressive, dynamic, and interesting. Even if that's just ruins, it tells us how the locations are better and if it's just a ruin it's actually better to hear since if that's how ruins look the major cities will be way more impressive.

We know it's not a major city, because Makarth Side is not one. We don't know if it's Makarth, the ruins, or Makarth Side, the settlement. Or if Makarth Side is ruins or Makarth is a settlement. We don't know much other than whet they already told us.

We do know that they already said the Makarth pic is ruins. He's just insinuating that because those ruins of a Nordic settlement are so impressive and dynamically interesting compared to Oblivion that the still inhabited and recently constructed Nordic settlements themselves will be similarly impressive (as seen in sick concept art).

There is no reason to release a screenshot of an unpopulated city when even towns that weren't completely traced into the map we've seen have been demoed to the press and screenscapped. Let's not be silly over a vague comment. It won't even surprise me if he throws in a group of bandits/hermits/goblins/archeologists/plane crash survivors at the last minute to mess with us. It would explain how the roof looks so good if it's a badly durable form of tile, though.

The thing about Twitter is that nothing on there is a press release or set in stone, they can give details they normally wouldn't give just as they can be vague or misleading to put us into hissy fits. :D
User avatar
Eilidh Brian
 
Posts: 3504
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 10:45 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 3:34 pm

Don't fall on Pete's tweets.

He had claimed that this was a Dwemer ruin before... Mr. Hines has been on Moonsugar lately.


in one of the GI intevieuws of Todd Howard he said that nords where living inside old dwemer cities
User avatar
Marlo Stanfield
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 11:00 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 1:58 pm

The fact that it went from 8 major cities in Oblivion to 5 in Skyrim was already enough to make me a bit angry, now it looks like they are about the same size as in Oblivion and even less populated!

I am pissed!

...

I should calm down and stop complaining.


I think your judging too early.
The fact that its just a still pic,should tell you that.
There is so much you cannot see in that picture,the place could be way bigger than that,you cant tell just from that pic.
I think it looks quite big from what i see i also think it looks good.
We will know more when we see gameplay footage.....you cant judge from a still pic with one perspective.
User avatar
Miragel Ginza
 
Posts: 3502
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 6:19 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 8:47 am

Markarth Side is a city in Skyrim.


I know that but what I was asking is what makes you think that the city is Markarth Side?


Markarth Side was a little hamlet suburb of Snowhawk in Arena.


Not a dwemer ruin?
User avatar
Mimi BC
 
Posts: 3282
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:30 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 8:56 pm

Hnnng I'm confused!

Firstly, I'm not quite sure what to make of the architectural style in the setting. I do see some elements that would strongly imply they're built by the Dwemer, such as the (copper?) roof shingles. It's possible that their settlements in Morrowind were more akin to facilities than actual living quarters, and we'll see some actual steampunk areas in the deepest reaches of these new ruins. Of course at the same time, the Dwemer ruins in Morrowind had desks and beds (something the Ayleid counterparts in Oblivion sorely lacked) so the metal structures still have merit as settlements.

Personally, this doesn't look like a city to me either. If it is, the Nords haven't been taking very good care of it. There's still debris everywhere (notably at the bottom), and the overgrown shrubbery and dead trees are quite a mess. I know that the Nords aren't quite as prudish as the Dunmer and Imperials, but it doesn't look like this area has been inhabited for very long in its current state. Plus, all the cool vertical elements (such as that mysterious door up in the cliff face) just scream "Morrowind Daedric ruin" to me.

The other possibility is as some stated, this is just a part of, perhaps the outermost reaches of the proper settlement. Markarth Side may have been named after the Dwemer ruins in close proximity, and Pete is just confused.
User avatar
Red Sauce
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:35 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 12:26 pm

We have already seen the map, and there are many more than 5 cities. There are around 23-25 multicell settlements/major locations scattered across the map. Pete didn't say anything about the 5 major cities and he didn't even indicate the screen was a city, hecwas just asked how large the cities would be and he suggested looking at Makarth and thinking for yourself. Basically, he means that the cities will be way more impressive, dynamic, and interesting. Even if that's just ruins, it tells us how the locations are better and if it's just a ruin it's actually better to hear since if that's how ruins look the major cities will be way more impressive.

We know it's not a major city, because Makarth Side is not one. We don't know if it's Makarth, the ruins, or Makarth Side, the settlement. Or if Makarth Side is ruins or Makarth is a settlement. We don't know much other than whet they already told us.

We do know that they already said the Makarth pic is ruins. He's just insinuating that because those ruins of a Nordic settlement are so impressive and dynamically interesting compared to Oblivion that the still inhabited and recently constructed Nordic settlements themselves will be similarly impressive (as seen in sick concept art).


Hate to break it to you but Markarth Side is one of the 7 major cities shown on previous maps. Also, Pete said look at the first screenshot and decide for yourself, meaning that it IS a city. As for "they have already said the Markarth pic is ruins", where does it say that they were ruins? Because I've never seen or heard anything about them being ruins.

Edit: Also, even if somewhere they were mentioned to be Dwemer ruins, it has been stated before that the Nords moved into Dwemer ruins and turned them into their own cities.
@Mankar The screenshot is labeled "Markarth" and since it has been revealed to be a city, it would be Markarth Side.
User avatar
Dominic Vaughan
 
Posts: 3531
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 1:47 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 8:10 pm

The fact that it went from 8 major cities in Oblivion to 5 in Skyrim was already enough to make me a bit angry, now it looks like they are about the same size as in Oblivion and even less populated!

I am pissed!

...

I should calm down and stop complaining.

Bear in mind there is a massive difference between major cities and settlements. That means there will probably be a load of smaller settlements of town size scattered around. It's not just going to be bam: five towns. I'd have thought Beth would have learned from all the tiny hamlets they placed in Oblivion. They weren't particularly interesting, and usually had no function save a singular quest that went through them (Umbra, for example). So yeah. Unclench, and stop getting your knickers in a twist. :P
User avatar
Assumptah George
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:43 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 9:52 am

I'll be pretty impressed if 5 massive cities = 5 Vivic/Imperial City size cities.
User avatar
Susan
 
Posts: 3536
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:46 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim