FO3 or FONV?

Post » Sun May 18, 2014 4:56 am

I am thinking about taking a break from Skyrim and seeing what Fallout is all about. I have never played any of the FO's and was wondering if I should get the GOTY version of FO3 or FONV. Which would you recommend?

User avatar
Richus Dude
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 1:17 am

Post » Sat May 17, 2014 3:30 pm

Fallout New Vegas
User avatar
quinnnn
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:11 pm

Post » Sat May 17, 2014 5:24 pm

I got Fallout 3 first so I could get the jist of what it was. Then I got New Vegas which I fell in love with at the time :yes:

User avatar
Myles
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 12:52 pm

Post » Sun May 18, 2014 5:04 am

That is what I was thinking. I always like to go with the newest titles. Compared to Skyrim, what is FONV like as far as bugs and other problems go? I am on Xbox.

User avatar
steve brewin
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:17 am

Post » Sat May 17, 2014 1:40 pm

Get Fallout NV.

Bugs are mainly fixed.

There's a few bad, but avoidable ones.

Don't ask me about the PS3.

User avatar
Alexis Estrada
 
Posts: 3507
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 6:22 pm

Post » Sat May 17, 2014 9:34 pm

NV.

User avatar
Natalie Taylor
 
Posts: 3301
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 7:54 pm

Post » Sat May 17, 2014 4:05 pm

Ok then. Looks like I will be getting NV. Thanks folks :tops:

User avatar
Etta Hargrave
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:27 am

Post » Sat May 17, 2014 3:46 pm

Fallout and Fallout 2 :fallout:

Then New Vegas, Tactics and Fallout 3.

User avatar
Facebook me
 
Posts: 3442
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 8:05 am

Post » Sun May 18, 2014 6:02 am

New Vegas, I can't recommend 1. It ha snot aged at all well in any way shape or form. It's story, choices, and reactivity are good but there is so much that needs to be put up with to get to that. Up to you on that one.

User avatar
Crystal Clear
 
Posts: 3552
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:42 am

Post » Sun May 18, 2014 3:39 am

If you like a vast open amusemant park, play FO3. FO3 is just like TES, you can do anything and go anywhere. If you like a smaller world, with a more story orientated game, play New Vegas. In New Vegas you can do anything and go anywhere also, just watch out for some strong opposition.

Also if you run into an unknown creature, and when you move the cursor over them it says "DeathClaw". Run, run like hell and don't look back.

User avatar
Jordyn Youngman
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:54 am

Post » Sat May 17, 2014 9:46 pm

NV

The choices with actual consequences may throw you off if you're used to Skyrim.

User avatar
Joey Avelar
 
Posts: 3370
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 11:11 am

Post » Sat May 17, 2014 1:47 pm

This!

User avatar
sw1ss
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 8:02 pm

Post » Sun May 18, 2014 4:29 am

Not true the combat is fairly simple and easy to pick up even being turn based which is the only possible qualm people should have.If it's to do with graphics (which i think suffice) then that is incredibly shallow and you'd probably be better off faping to crisis 3 :shrug:

User avatar
Kayla Oatney
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 9:02 pm

Post » Sat May 17, 2014 11:27 pm

First of all, why not just make this a poll?

Second of all, get New Vegas. Not only will it make you more accompanied with Fallout 1 and 2, but I think that it is generally a better overall experience.

User avatar
CSar L
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 9:36 pm

Post » Sun May 18, 2014 3:09 am

I recommend this as well if you have some extra cash.

User avatar
Vahpie
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:07 pm

Post » Sat May 17, 2014 2:33 pm

Like the others said, if you're able, get the first two games.
User avatar
Dewayne Quattlebaum
 
Posts: 3529
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:29 pm

Post » Sat May 17, 2014 6:24 pm

Well there are two ways to look at if, if you want to be mildly introduced into the Fallout franchise and ease your way into it then going from Skyrim to Fallout 3 is easier than Skyrim to FNV and there are also tons of features in FNV that are not present in Fallout 3, so going backwards from FNV could mean that FO3 might not be as enjoyable.

So going by that: FO3>FONV and then if you are interested in the expanded universe >FO1>FO2>FOT and if you're craving for more you can read the Van Buren design documents over at the Fallout wikia or read the Fallout Bible.

But if you want to have a full understanding of where it comes from I think you should play the original games before the newer ones, in that case you should go FO1>FO2>FOT>FO3>FONV.

User avatar
Brian Newman
 
Posts: 3466
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:36 pm

Post » Sun May 18, 2014 12:01 am

3's more similar to TES in the sense of you have a large open world without any boundaries.

On the other hand, New Vegas has more quests which can have multiple endings, and a better storyline.

I personally like 3 better, mainly because I despised having invisible boundaries in New Vegas, and it felt buggier on the 360.

User avatar
rolanda h
 
Posts: 3314
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:09 pm

Post » Sun May 18, 2014 2:58 am

If you really want to see what Fallout is all about then you should to do as Gabriel and others have suggested, start from the beginning with Fallout 1. But if you only want to mess with the newer games then NV would be the way to go, it's a better representation of the Fallout series than F3.

User avatar
Kayla Keizer
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:31 pm

Post » Sat May 17, 2014 6:55 pm

Between the two [FO3 and NV], I would suggest FO3 first, then FO:NV.

But as the others have mentioned, I would recommend playing http://www.gog.com/gamecard/fallout (and optionally ~though recommended, http://www.gog.com/gamecard/fallout_2) to get an understanding of why they they would spend so much money to get the license to make Fallout 3 & 4.

As you might know, the Fallout franchise was quite different originally; the intended experience in the original series was not of first person sandboxes in the popular sense that you can do ~whatever. In the Fallouts' you can do what you want ~but you'll have to live with it. :chaos:

Also by inherent design it's more a game about directing your character than about being your character. In Fallout 1 & 2, you are limited to what your PC can actually accomplish. For instance... If they can't see a landmine ~you don't see the landmine; and if they can't pick a lock, you either don't get it open, or maybe your NPC will do it; (it's not an option to ask them though).

[Some players will choose to cheat the game in times when their PC fails to succeed, and/or gets caught.] :(

User avatar
Naughty not Nice
 
Posts: 3527
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 6:14 am

Post » Sat May 17, 2014 3:28 pm

I would highly suggest getting fo3 and fonv and play fo3 first. Its optional but if you see them on sale id also suggest getting fo1 2 and brotherhood as a conbo.

User avatar
Soph
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:24 am

Post » Sat May 17, 2014 2:15 pm

I would agree with this.

Consider this though, F3 GOTY is $15 new(360) and New Vegas isint too much more.

Now, simply saying New Vegas is my choice because imo it was the better game is ok but, you may end up like me playing NV first and finding you want more Fallout. So you try out F3 and find its "lacking" some elements which you really liked in NV making the experience not as great as if you were to play it first.

Just something to consider. If you have a job than buying both games is still less expensive than any newly released game these days. If you have a PC then you can get the first two Fallout games for something like 20$ on GOG.com i believe.

Anywho, I wish this is how I went about it. Sadly I didnt and playing F3 wasnt as well received by myself.

User avatar
Avril Churchill
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 10:00 am

Post » Sat May 17, 2014 9:49 pm

I think coming from TES/Skyrim, Fallout 3 would be an easier choice to get into the Fallout universe. Just don't install Broken Steel!!!
User avatar
Sophie Morrell
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 11:13 am

Post » Sat May 17, 2014 8:13 pm

I would recommend getting Fallout 3 first. If you start on New Vegas first then play Fallout 3, you aren't going to enjoy it as much since the improvements New Vegas featured aren't there. That way you can enjoy both FO3 and New Vegas when you get that afterwards. However, New Vegas is the better of the two IMO.

I'd recommend getting the originals as well if you want a full understanding of the Fallout universe, and to overall enjoy the best the Fallout series has to offer.

User avatar
lacy lake
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 12:13 am

Post » Sat May 17, 2014 11:50 pm

Fallout: New Vegas

User avatar
Melanie Steinberg
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:25 pm

Next

Return to Fallout Series Discussion