fourth era

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 6:23 pm

http://www.gamesas.com/bgsforums/index.php?showtopic=1029912
I may be wrong though.

But if it doesn't take place in the 4th Era, it will take place at the same time that Oblivion does, or in the past.

I think it is most likely going to be at the dawn of the 4th Era, but nobody knows the truth, except for Bethesda themselves, but according to them, trhey have no plans for the future of TES. :biglaugh:
[sarcasm]
Yeah, no future plans...
[/sarcasm]

But nobody really knows, but it is likely to be at the dawn of the 4th Era.


Uh, that "interview" was a quote taken out of context. Bethesda confirmed that there will be a TES V.
May the Nords get their asses kicked by the Dunmer.

Fixed


Shouldn't we switch Nords with Bosmer?
User avatar
Dan Endacott
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 9:12 am

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:16 am

Uh, that "interview" was a quote taken out of context. Bethesda confirmed that there will be a TES V.

I know, It was meant to be said with Uber Sarcasm in it.
But what I was getting to was that we can't ask them, because they would probably deny its existance, so there is only one way of finding out when it will take place... :ninja:

No, Bethesda said there would be a TES V. We don't know anything about it but Bethesda confirmed it's existence.


I always thought they said that they had no future plans, but thanks for confirming that they confirmed its existance.

NOTE: This part a response to the post that is shown BELOW, not above.

Please, no more about whether or not Bethesda confirmed it or not, not reason to get even more off topic...
User avatar
Matt Bee
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 5:32 am

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 6:45 am

I know, It was meant to be said with Uber Sarcasm in it.
But what I was getting to was that we can't ask them, because they would probably deny its existance, so there is only one way of finding out when it will take place... :ninja:


No, Bethesda said there would be a TES V. We don't know anything about it but Bethesda confirmed it's existence.
User avatar
Natalie Taylor
 
Posts: 3301
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 7:54 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 5:52 pm

Btw, I meant that I feared a daedric invasion.
User avatar
Oscar Vazquez
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 12:08 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 5:22 pm

Sheogorath says the gray march happens at the end of each era


Nah. That doesn't match. Era's happen when ever some one on Nirn decides it's time. In Sheogoraths realm they seem to have happened every 1000 years straight. Nevermind the possibility that there is more then one system for keeping dates like the Alesian years.


Oh yea man you are totally one hundred and ten percent right! Two 100 feet tall gods battling it out for the fate of the mortal realm is so like totally unepic. Having the towns of cyrodiil unite against the daedric siege engine for one battle to determine the fate of the empire was also totally lame and unepic. Omfg i don't know why you guys are so damn picky and blind.


Yes two epic gods battling it out while I'm sitting on the side line. I'm feeling like a real epic hero there. :P
User avatar
^_^
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 12:01 am

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:59 am

Nah, lets crush the Bosmer and Imperials!

Nah man nah

Shouldn't we switch Nords with Bosmer?

Not unless you want to be horribly murdered from 200ft plus by sniper rifle Bow
User avatar
Nina Mccormick
 
Posts: 3507
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:38 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 12:46 pm

Couldnt it stil be in the 3rd era ( before OB ) who knows?
User avatar
Dan Endacott
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 9:12 am

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 11:46 am

Couldnt it stil be in the 3rd era ( before OB ) who knows?


It would be a prequel then but it is possible. I would rather have them continue with the collapsing empire though.
User avatar
Nims
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 3:29 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 5:25 am

(Question) How many years are in one era? I,ve always wanted to know.
User avatar
lauren cleaves
 
Posts: 3307
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:35 am

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 4:05 pm

(Question) How many years are in one era? I,ve always wanted to know.


100 right?
User avatar
Jonathan Windmon
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:23 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:50 am

(Question) How many years are in one era? I,ve always wanted to know.

The emperor decides when to declare a new era.
User avatar
Jason Rice
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:42 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:44 pm

The emperor decides when to declare a new era.

:ooo: I bet that helps the people stay organized. :rolleyes:
User avatar
Cagla Cali
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 8:36 am

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:51 pm

If it follows Oblivion, it will be in the fourth era or on. At the end, Martin says that the fourth era has begun, so quite technically, a small part of Oblivion itself takes place in the fourth era.
User avatar
Claire
 
Posts: 3329
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 4:01 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 6:35 pm

As long as it isn't a prequel to Oblivion, then Fourth Era it is.
User avatar
herrade
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 1:09 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:39 am

100 right?

Isn't it 1,000?

(In a traditional sense, I know in Tamriel it's whenever the Emperor declares one)
User avatar
Kyra
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:24 am

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:27 am

First era lasted for 2920 years.
The second era lasted for 896 years, starting when Potentate Versidue-Shaie immediately came into power after the last of the Remans was assassinated
The third era lasted for 433 years, started when Tiber Septim united all of Tamriel.

Personally, I think Martin was being over dramatic
User avatar
Nicole Kraus
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:34 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:23 pm

Why was Martin being over-dramatic? Even Ocato acknowledged thing were going to be different. I mean, Martin's sacrifice and what it did is/was huge.
User avatar
Dalley hussain
 
Posts: 3480
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 2:45 am

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 6:30 pm

Why was Martin being over-dramatic? Even Ocato acknowledged thing were going to be different. I mean, Martin's sacrifice and what it did is/was huge.

I find many of the events in the previous eras to have more significance and strife than the end of the third.
User avatar
Chantel Hopkin
 
Posts: 3533
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:41 am

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:12 pm

I find many of the events in the previous eras to have more significance and strife than the end of the third.


Doesn't make the events on this era any less significant than they are.
User avatar
Mark Hepworth
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 1:51 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 11:13 am

The only items of significance worth ending an era over were the end of the Septim line and the breaking of the red diamond jewel, signifying a permanent change in the link between Nirn and Oblivion. Just another measly battle between a couple of gods wouldn't cut it, just as it wasn't the end of the era when Old Mournhold was destroyed by M. Dagon and he in turn was banished by the Tribunal (3 "living gods").

Epic? Sort of. It was beyond "mortal" proportions, but not a particularly major fight in terms of human participation: about 30 guys in assorted tin suits battling a couple dozen miscellaneous Daedra in an almost meaningless struggle, while the two main contestants did their own thing to settle the issue regardless of the actions of the "lesser" parties, and you sat and twiddled your thumbs on the sidelines through the latter half. That falls into what I would describe as a "small skirmish", not even close to a true "battle".

In MW, you got to swat at least a small portion of a true diety yourself, while a demi-god tried to stop you. The outcome ended the blight storms, even if the difference between Blight storms and the still-frequent Ash storms wasn't overly apparent.
User avatar
Roddy
 
Posts: 3564
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:50 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:57 am

Well not to mention what Martin and the player did are far more permanent.
User avatar
Sian Ennis
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 11:46 am

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:47 pm

Well not to mention what Martin and the player did are far more permanent.

Except what did the player really "do?" Martin annoyingly trumps all with the mythic apotheosis card. The player was always just the errand boy.

And SI doesn't' count, as no-one outside of SI will know what has occurred there. Sheogorath is dead. Long live Sheogorath.
User avatar
Laura Tempel
 
Posts: 3484
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:53 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:48 am

Not to mention if Martin was around, he probably would have called the assassination of the Potentate as the end of the second era.

Quite frankly, Martin has no authority to call the end of the third era, because he's dead for one. All I heard was him just monologuing, and Ocato has no authority to call the end of this era. What was the beginning 400 years of the second age basically amounts to what the third age. After the last legitimate ruler was killed off (what was Potentate at the time, and not even Tamriellic), Tamriel dissolved into many civil wars and splintered kingdoms (almost like the dark ages in our time). It wasn't till 400 years after the Potentate was killed did Talos start kicking ass, and then declared the end of the second age when he united all of Tamriel under the banner of the third empire.

This is why I am saying that these third age should last a little longer. Just because Martin died and MD had a skirmish was the imperial city, doesn't mean the era has to end. If that sort of thinking was applied, we'd be in the 5th era or something. Seriously, in the first era, we had the enslaved humans, they rose up and become the dominate force in Cyrodiil. If we use Martin logic, it becomes the end of the first era, and we're now on the second when the first empire arises. Then it falls, and we're left with a bit of chaos. Martin probably would have called this the end of the second era. Then, when the Remans took over and kicked some butt, Martin logic would have said this would have been the third era. Then came the last of the Remans assassinated, the Potentates take over and that becomes the 4th era. Then they die and the land dissolves into civil war, marking the 5th in Martin Logic. Next, we get Talos kicking butt, and uniting Tamriel under one banner of the third empire, marking this to be the 6th era in Martin Logic. And now at the present, with Martin Logic, we're now in the 7th era. See why I am against the fourth era suddenly appearing, just because MD decided to stomp on 1 or 2 buildings in the Imperial City.

EDIT: Extended my argument further
User avatar
Leilene Nessel
 
Posts: 3428
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 2:11 am

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 11:22 am

Except about 30 40ft tall gates to oblivion appeared and demons started marching out of them.....

Marching out? You mean pacing back and forth?
User avatar
Sun of Sammy
 
Posts: 3442
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:38 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 2:54 pm

The Septim line is not ended, there are maybe thousands of other descendants of Tiber Septim other than the Imperial family, and i recall that each Era ends when there are no more heirs to the current line, so a new family must take up the throne.
User avatar
Jeneene Hunte
 
Posts: 3478
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 3:18 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion