Been a long time since, but I did something similar after a conversation with MK. It's not properly fact-checked and the focus lies more on a creation timetable than a classification of its participants, but maybe it helps:http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v521/Nalion_/creation_table.jpg
That is very useful. I kind of left out the definition of aedra being mixed between Anu and Padomay. I guess I was trying to distill black and white from Gray. Thanks for the link.
Every ada fits into a pattern of three: an original whole, an anuic hypostasis, and a padomaic hypostasis. This is not exactly division, as the original continues to exist, but it is not exactly reproduction either, as the hypostases still 'are' the original. Any ada posited as descending from another must therefore have a unique sibling, and any ada posited as a sibling must have an original whole. Every entity that we know of (other than Padhome itself) is a hypostasis of Anu. What we know as Padomaics are those ada that come from the padomaic branches of relatively early divisions below Anu. The number of stars is the number of ada that participated in the convention. The base 3 logarithm of the number of stars provides the lower bound on the number of divisions between the first and penultimate divisions.The creation of Mundus was the first and only recombination of ada, and it is not possible for ada to withdraw from this combination in such a way that the Mundus would continue to exist. The last level of division occurred at the convention, at which point all of the known aedra and daedra began to exist. Any reference to aedra or daedra saying or doing things before the convention must be taken as referring to their hyperstases.Division at that point was the only way to escape the Mundus without destroying it, so each ada divided into the parts that sought freedom (daedra) and those that wanted to preserve what had been created (aedra). The departure of the padomaic elements created the stars. This had to be counterbalanced by the introduction of new limitations to maintain the exactness of Mundus: the entrance of the entities that caused the unstars of the serpent constellation (by travelling the other way), particularly Lorkhan. The spirits that made no attempt to escape became mortals.
So your saying that the current Aedra/Daedra didn't even exist as lesser spirits before the last convention? Creation myths simply refer to their hypostases?
I'd say Azura is Padomay aligned, and bretons don't count because they're a hybrid race that came later, and the dunmer didn't come into existence till they were cursed. With the dunmer, they chose to follow new gods and beliefs, but were known as chimer for this belief. At this point, they looked a lot like altmer, and it wasn't until Azura cursed them did the chimer become dunmer. Also, all spirits and things were et'Ada, but it wasn't till the creation of Mundus did the division of Aedra, Daedra, and Magna Ge (those who left to the Aetherius) appear. As for the status of the et'Ada, they're a mix of padomay and anu, though some favoring one side over another.As for more in-depth anolysis, mortals are nothing more than lesser spirits who now reside on Mundus, built upon the pieces and bodies of aedra and earthbones. It could be argued that certain mortals are more Anu aligned or Padomay aligned, but I don't really find much of a point, as all being in the days before are just et'Ada (which I explained early), thanks to the Gray Maybe. As for the difference between Earthbones and Aedra, the Earthbones completely gave themselves up, while the Aedra only gave a part of themselves up. The Daedra are spirits that decided to reside in Oblivion and not participate in creation at all. The Magna Ge are those who did not participate, and fled to the Aetherius. Magnus is one such being, who tore the largest hole through Oblivion into the Aetherius, while the stars are the spirits who did the same, but aren't as long. Meridia used to be a Magna Ge, but she broke rule number 1, which is DO NOT INTERACT WITH OUTSIDERS.Though, typical convention will make a note that the daedra are more padomay aligned, while the aedra are anu. Shor/Shezzar/Lorkhan, however, is noted as being more padomayic, despite giving a part of himself to creation. This in turn makes me believe introducing how aligned a spirit is to Anu and Padomay is crap when it comes to figuring out what is daedric and what is aedric.How I would classify would be something like this http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/8041/elderscrollbeingclassif.jpg, though Nalion is something I'd say may be more accurate than mine. Of course, this is using Monomyth definition of how the world began; I am NOT touching Redguard myths, they make my head hurt.
I like that outline, but wouldn't mortals be descended from the Aedra specifically? Since they appeared on Nirn?
You're right about the Dunmer and Bretons though. However I like the split Nalion mentioned between the wandering and settled Ehlnofey since all the elves came from the same stock and the men from the other.
What stock did the betmer come from?
Thanks for the ongoing discussion and comments guys, I'm learning a lot!