From Myth to Mortals

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:25 pm

I've been interested recently in the gradient spiritualis (well I made that up). But basically the order of divinity from gods and demons to mortals.

I put together this spreadsheet on it. But I wanted to know what some of you lore buffs thought about it. Most of it is purely speculation, specifically which spirits are aligned with Anu, and which with Padomay. My placement of the alignments is mostly due to my own thoughts on it. I haven't included culture-heroes like Phynaster and Morihaus or the Yokudan gods (although some lines can be drawn to connect them to the Tamrielic pantheons, ie. Sep-Lorkhan).

http://i489.photobucket.com/albums/rr256/ericthered1090/Random%20Stuff/MythtoMortals.jpg

-Melchior Dahrk

p.s. I am doing this so it can be picked apart and discussed if there is any interest, I have no emotional ties to it :)
User avatar
lisa nuttall
 
Posts: 3277
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 1:33 pm

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:21 am

It is hard to make anything like that accurate since we don't know definitively what Et' Ada are aligned with what primeval force besides for a few exeptions (Shor is definitely Padomaic)
User avatar
vicki kitterman
 
Posts: 3494
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:58 am

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 3:35 pm

It is hard to make anything like that accurate since we don't know definitively what Et' Ada are aligned with what primeval force besides for a few exeptions (Shor is definitely Padomaic)

Right, he is the only one we know for sure. Shouldn't Akatosh (Anuiel) be aligned with Anu? In the High Elven creation myths isn't he his son? And I thought that I read somewhere that Azura was a Daedra aligned with Anu, but I'd have to find a source...

Obviously this could never be 100% accurate, I'm just trying to associate it as much as possible with each divine's personality (if it can be called such).
User avatar
Tamika Jett
 
Posts: 3301
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 3:44 am

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 7:19 am

Hmm, from what I can see it looks accurate, though I am by no means an expert. It looks very good, I'm glad to see all the organization you are doing with the lore :) Makes things easier to sort out in my head and whatnot. Keep up the good work :goodjob:
User avatar
Victoria Vasileva
 
Posts: 3340
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 5:42 pm

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:01 am

Yes, the Time-dragon is definitely Anubic.
User avatar
casey macmillan
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:37 pm

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:41 am

Hmm, from what I can see it looks accurate, though I am by no means an expert. It looks very good, I'm glad to see all the organization you are doing with the lore :) Makes things easier to sort out in my head and whatnot. Keep up the good work :goodjob:

Thanks, I've had a lot of time to read up on some lore. I've re-read all the obscure texts, now I need to re-read the books...

feel free to use the table if you like :D

Yes, the Time-dragon is definitely Anubic.

Thought so... so many that we don't know though *sigh*
User avatar
Alessandra Botham
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:27 pm

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 1:06 pm

Been a long time since, but I did something similar after a conversation with MK. It's not properly fact-checked and the focus lies more on a creation timetable than a classification of its participants, but maybe it helps:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v521/Nalion_/creation_table.jpg
User avatar
electro_fantics
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:50 pm

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:14 am

Every ada fits into a pattern of three: an original whole, an anuic hypostasis, and a padomaic hypostasis. This is not exactly division, as the original continues to exist, but it is not exactly reproduction either, as the hypostases still 'are' the original. Any ada posited as descending from another must therefore have a unique sibling, and any ada posited as a sibling must have an original whole. Every entity that we know of (other than Padhome itself) is a hypostasis of Anu. What we know as Padomaics are those ada that come from the padomaic branches of relatively early divisions below Anu. The number of stars is the number of ada that participated in the convention. The base 3 logarithm of the number of stars provides the lower bound on the number of divisions between the first and penultimate divisions.

The creation of Mundus was the first and only recombination of ada, and it is not possible for ada to withdraw from this combination in such a way that the Mundus would continue to exist. The last level of division occurred at the convention, at which point all of the known aedra and daedra began to exist. Any reference to aedra or daedra saying or doing things before the convention must be taken as referring to their hyperstases.

Division at that point was the only way to escape the Mundus without destroying it, so each ada divided into the parts that sought freedom (daedra) and those that wanted to preserve what had been created (aedra). The departure of the padomaic elements created the stars. This had to be counterbalanced by the introduction of new limitations to maintain the exactness of Mundus: the entrance of the entities that caused the unstars of the serpent constellation (by travelling the other way), particularly Lorkhan. The spirits that made no attempt to escape became mortals.
User avatar
Aliish Sheldonn
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:19 am

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:39 pm

I'd say Azura is Padomay aligned, and bretons don't count because they're a hybrid race that came later, and the dunmer didn't come into existence till they were cursed. With the dunmer, they chose to follow new gods and beliefs, but were known as chimer for this belief. At this point, they looked a lot like altmer, and it wasn't until Azura cursed them did the chimer become dunmer. Also, all spirits and things were et'Ada, but it wasn't till the creation of Mundus did the division of Aedra, Daedra, and Magna Ge (those who left to the Aetherius) appear. As for the status of the et'Ada, they're a mix of padomay and anu, though some favoring one side over another.

As for more in-depth anolysis, mortals are nothing more than lesser spirits who now reside on Mundus, built upon the pieces and bodies of aedra and earthbones. It could be argued that certain mortals are more Anu aligned or Padomay aligned, but I don't really find much of a point, as all being in the days before are just et'Ada (which I explained early), thanks to the Gray Maybe. As for the difference between Earthbones and Aedra, the Earthbones completely gave themselves up, while the Aedra only gave a part of themselves up. The Daedra are spirits that decided to reside in Oblivion and not participate in creation at all. The Magna Ge are those who did not participate, and fled to the Aetherius. Magnus is one such being, who tore the largest hole through Oblivion into the Aetherius, while the stars are the spirits who did the same, but aren't as long. Meridia used to be a Magna Ge, but she broke rule number 1, which is DO NOT INTERACT WITH OUTSIDERS.

Though, typical convention will make a note that the daedra are more padomay aligned, while the aedra are anu. Shor/Shezzar/Lorkhan, however, is noted as being more padomayic, despite giving a part of himself to creation. This in turn makes me believe introducing how aligned a spirit is to Anu and Padomay is crap when it comes to figuring out what is daedric and what is aedric.

How I would classify would be something like this http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/8041/elderscrollbeingclassif.jpg, though Nalion is something I'd say may be more accurate than mine. Of course, this is using Monomyth definition of how the world began; I am NOT touching Redguard myths, they make my head hurt.
User avatar
Janette Segura
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:36 am

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 6:36 pm

Been a long time since, but I did something similar after a conversation with MK. It's not properly fact-checked and the focus lies more on a creation timetable than a classification of its participants, but maybe it helps:http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v521/Nalion_/creation_table.jpg

That is very useful. I kind of left out the definition of aedra being mixed between Anu and Padomay. I guess I was trying to distill black and white from Gray. Thanks for the link.

Every ada fits into a pattern of three: an original whole, an anuic hypostasis, and a padomaic hypostasis. This is not exactly division, as the original continues to exist, but it is not exactly reproduction either, as the hypostases still 'are' the original. Any ada posited as descending from another must therefore have a unique sibling, and any ada posited as a sibling must have an original whole. Every entity that we know of (other than Padhome itself) is a hypostasis of Anu. What we know as Padomaics are those ada that come from the padomaic branches of relatively early divisions below Anu. The number of stars is the number of ada that participated in the convention. The base 3 logarithm of the number of stars provides the lower bound on the number of divisions between the first and penultimate divisions.The creation of Mundus was the first and only recombination of ada, and it is not possible for ada to withdraw from this combination in such a way that the Mundus would continue to exist. The last level of division occurred at the convention, at which point all of the known aedra and daedra began to exist. Any reference to aedra or daedra saying or doing things before the convention must be taken as referring to their hyperstases.Division at that point was the only way to escape the Mundus without destroying it, so each ada divided into the parts that sought freedom (daedra) and those that wanted to preserve what had been created (aedra). The departure of the padomaic elements created the stars. This had to be counterbalanced by the introduction of new limitations to maintain the exactness of Mundus: the entrance of the entities that caused the unstars of the serpent constellation (by travelling the other way), particularly Lorkhan. The spirits that made no attempt to escape became mortals.

So your saying that the current Aedra/Daedra didn't even exist as lesser spirits before the last convention? Creation myths simply refer to their hypostases?

I'd say Azura is Padomay aligned, and bretons don't count because they're a hybrid race that came later, and the dunmer didn't come into existence till they were cursed. With the dunmer, they chose to follow new gods and beliefs, but were known as chimer for this belief. At this point, they looked a lot like altmer, and it wasn't until Azura cursed them did the chimer become dunmer. Also, all spirits and things were et'Ada, but it wasn't till the creation of Mundus did the division of Aedra, Daedra, and Magna Ge (those who left to the Aetherius) appear. As for the status of the et'Ada, they're a mix of padomay and anu, though some favoring one side over another.As for more in-depth anolysis, mortals are nothing more than lesser spirits who now reside on Mundus, built upon the pieces and bodies of aedra and earthbones. It could be argued that certain mortals are more Anu aligned or Padomay aligned, but I don't really find much of a point, as all being in the days before are just et'Ada (which I explained early), thanks to the Gray Maybe. As for the difference between Earthbones and Aedra, the Earthbones completely gave themselves up, while the Aedra only gave a part of themselves up. The Daedra are spirits that decided to reside in Oblivion and not participate in creation at all. The Magna Ge are those who did not participate, and fled to the Aetherius. Magnus is one such being, who tore the largest hole through Oblivion into the Aetherius, while the stars are the spirits who did the same, but aren't as long. Meridia used to be a Magna Ge, but she broke rule number 1, which is DO NOT INTERACT WITH OUTSIDERS.Though, typical convention will make a note that the daedra are more padomay aligned, while the aedra are anu. Shor/Shezzar/Lorkhan, however, is noted as being more padomayic, despite giving a part of himself to creation. This in turn makes me believe introducing how aligned a spirit is to Anu and Padomay is crap when it comes to figuring out what is daedric and what is aedric.How I would classify would be something like this http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/8041/elderscrollbeingclassif.jpg, though Nalion is something I'd say may be more accurate than mine. Of course, this is using Monomyth definition of how the world began; I am NOT touching Redguard myths, they make my head hurt.

I like that outline, but wouldn't mortals be descended from the Aedra specifically? Since they appeared on Nirn?

You're right about the Dunmer and Bretons though. However I like the split Nalion mentioned between the wandering and settled Ehlnofey since all the elves came from the same stock and the men from the other.

What stock did the betmer come from?



Thanks for the ongoing discussion and comments guys, I'm learning a lot!
User avatar
Beulah Bell
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 7:08 pm

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:57 am

I like that outline, but wouldn't mortals be descended from the Aedra specifically? Since they appeared on Nirn?
You're right about the Dunmer and Bretons though. However I like the split Nalion mentioned between the wandering and settled Ehlnofey since all the elves came from the same stock and the men from the other.

What stock did the betmer come from?

Thanks for the ongoing discussion and comments guys, I'm learning a lot!

Mer, yes, because they like to think of themselves as gods, specifically the altmer, in the past and now grow weaker every generation. To the men, we were weak spirits given divine mercy. But the only definition I find Aedra to be is the spirits that gave themselves to be Mundus. The mortals were the lesser spirits that ended up there, the settlers being the mer, and the wanderers being men. Khajiit were once mer, but are not longer. Argonians are...different. They seem to be more of the product of the Hist, which of whom we have extremely little information.
User avatar
josie treuberg
 
Posts: 3572
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 7:56 am

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 6:54 pm

I don't think the chart works so well, because it doesn't allow for the grey inbetween. I would suggest rather a gradient list, ranging from Padomay to Anu and everything inbetween based on the inclination of said being(s).
User avatar
Dan Stevens
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 5:00 pm

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:02 pm

I've made an updated version of the table based on some of the comments here and some refelction :)

http://i489.photobucket.com/albums/rr256/ericthered1090/TESMythtoMortals.jpg
User avatar
Marquis T
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:39 pm

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:35 pm

Orismer = orc, not orsimer --> orc. Orc is just a short way of saying orsimer. Before the orcs were orcs, they were just a bunch of aldmer who revered Trinimac over anyone else. Also, they only became exiled, because they became fugly and very unaldmer looking. Also, the bosmer aren't hybrids. So really it's like this with the mer:
Aldmer --> Altmer, bosmer, chimer, orsimer, falmer, etc. Chimer --> dunmer.

The khajiit were believed to be bosmer, but due to the unstable nature of Nirn at the time, everyone was shifting into different things. Azura halted this by binding their forms to the lunar lattice, then Y'ffre came and stabilized the world.
User avatar
Chloe Botham
 
Posts: 3537
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 12:11 am

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 12:08 pm

Orismer = orc, not orsimer --> orc. Orc is just a short way of saying orsimer. Before the orcs were orcs, they were just a bunch of aldmer who revered Trinimac over anyone else. So really it's like this
Aldmer --> Altmer, bosmer, chimer, orsimer, falmer, etc. The khajiit were believed to be bosmer, but due to the unstable nature of Nirn at the time, everyone was shifting into different things. Azura halted this by binding their forms to the lunar lattice, then Y'ffre came and stabilized the world.

That's true about the Orcs I suppose, I was just trying to point out that they changed. They weren't known as Orcs before they were Transmorgified though were they?

Isn't it true though that the Altmer claim that the Bosmer have intermingled with men? Were they originally pure-bred Bosmer then and NOW they are mixed, like the Bretons? Or is that just the Altmer being snotty?

So Y'ffre stabilized everyone then? Not just the Bosmer?
User avatar
Hella Beast
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:50 am

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:54 am

That's true about the Orcs I suppose, I was just trying to point out that they changed. They weren't known as Orcs before they were Transmorgified though were they?

Isn't it true though that the Altmer claim that the Bosmer have intermingled with men? Were they originally pure-bred Bosmer then and NOW they are mixed, like the Bretons? Or is that just the Altmer being snotty?

So Y'ffre stabilized everyone then? Not just the Bosmer?

* The 'orcs' were just aldmer who were hardline with Trinimac
* The altmer are HIGHLY snooty. They consider their forest brethren to be nothing more than tainted for they took "mannish wives" which says to me, women who were bigger and tougher.
* Y'ffre stabilized Nirn, not just he bosmer. It's that the bosmer hold Y'ffre at the highest esteem.
User avatar
Chris BEvan
 
Posts: 3359
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 4:40 pm

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 12:48 pm

* The 'orcs' were just aldmer who were hardline with Trinimac
* The altmer are HIGHLY snooty. They consider their forest brethren to be nothing more than tainted for they took "mannish wives" which says to me, women who were bigger and tougher.

But they weren't actually called Orcs then were they?

And so the Bosmer took man-ISH wives not human wives then.
User avatar
louise hamilton
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 9:16 am

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:42 pm

The Bosmer just chose the uglier wives, and so evolved uglier (in the Altmeri veiw, i find pointed ears in general repulsive.) I see elves like this:

Ehlnofey-> Elves-> Aldmer > Orsimer, Breton (half), Altmer, Chimer-> Dunmer
Falmer-> Reiklings? Bosmer -> Kajiit
Dwemer
Aylieds
User avatar
Bird
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 12:45 am

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 1:52 pm

I've made an updated version of the table based on some of the comments here and some refelction :)

http://i489.photobucket.com/albums/rr256/ericthered1090/TESMythtoMortals.jpg

aI always thought that Kothrigi were decended from wandering Hist
User avatar
Alessandra Botham
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:27 pm

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 7:30 pm

But they weren't actually called Orcs then were they?

This quote should help:
Orcs were born during the latter days of the Dawn Era. History has mislabeled them beastfolk, related to the goblin races, but the Orcs are actually the children of Trinimac, strongest of the Altmeri ancestor spirits. When Trinimac was eaten by the Daedroth Prince Boethiah, and transformed in that foul god's insides, the Orcs were transformed as well. The ancient name for the Orcs is 'Orsimer,' which means 'The Pariah Folk.' They now follow Malauch, the remains of Trinimac.

Who is Malauch?

He is more commonly know as the Daedroth Prince Malacath, 'whose sphere is the patronage of the spurned and ostracized, the sworn oath, and the bloody curse.' He is not technically a Daedra Lord, nor do the other Daedra recognize him as such, but this is fitting for his sphere. Of old he was Trinimac, the champion of the High Elven pantheon, in some places more popular than Auri-El, who protected them against enemies without and within. When Trinimac and his followers attempted to halt the Velothi dissident movement, Boethiah ate him. Trinimac's body and spirit were corrupted, and he emerged as Malacath. His followers were likewise changed for the worse. Despised by everyone, especially the inviolate Auri-El, they quickly fled to the northern wastes, near Saarthal. They fought Nords and Chimer for a place in the world, but did not get much. In Skyrim, Malacath is called Orkey, or Old Knocker, and his battles with Ysmir are legendary.


And so the Bosmer took man-ISH wives not human wives then.

Here's the quote I refer to
"Auriel pleaded with Anu to take them back, but he had already filled their places with something else. But his soul was gentler and granted Auriel his Bow and Shield, so that he might save the Aldmer from the hordes of Men. Some had already fallen, like the Chimer, who listened to tainted et'Ada, and others, like the Bosmer, had soiled Time's line by taking Mannish wives.

User avatar
Tracey Duncan
 
Posts: 3299
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:32 am

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:08 am

I've made an updated version of the table based on some of the comments here and some refelction :)

http://i489.photobucket.com/albums/rr256/ericthered1090/TESMythtoMortals.jpg


I'm almost certain the left-handed Elves are Dwemer.
User avatar
Teghan Harris
 
Posts: 3370
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:31 pm

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 7:05 am

I'm almost certain the left-handed Elves are Dwemer.


Based on what evidence?
User avatar
Charleigh Anderson
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:17 am

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:10 pm

Doesn't Dyus clearly state that Knights of Order are something entirely different from Daedra?
User avatar
Helen Quill
 
Posts: 3334
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 1:12 pm

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:40 am

I'm almost certain the left-handed Elves are Dwemer.

It's speculated, but not confirmed. The only conformation of where the dwemer have been is Hammerfel and Morrowind. Everywhere else, it's unknown.

@Melchior Dahrk: I'm pretty sure all elves were at one point aldmer (proto-mer), but divisions eventually happened and we ended up with what we now have. Currently, the altmer are the closest thing to the aldmer of old.

@Don't forget this: read this passage from the interview
The limited imaginations of Mundus’ inhabitants are very amusing. There are as many types of servants as stars in the sky. Daedra, as you call them, are but one of the more useful. The Knights of Order are yet another. My Lord Jyggalag is partial to their lack of creativity and independence.
If accurate, there's still more we don't know, or Dyus running his mouth off. I'd say they're still daedra in a sense they're still spirits that did not participate in the creation of Mundus, and reside in Oblivion. It's a very general term, yes, but so is mortal. svck it daedra!
User avatar
Cat Haines
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:27 am

Post » Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:08 am

The Bosmer just chose the uglier wives, and so evolved uglier (in the Altmeri veiw, i find pointed ears in general repulsive.) I see elves like this:

Ehlnofey-> Elves-> Aldmer > Orsimer, Breton (half), Altmer, Chimer-> Dunmer
Falmer-> Reiklings? Bosmer -> Kajiit
Dwemer
Aylieds


If you read the Words of the Clan mother closely you'll notice that both the Bosmer, Khajiit and all other Mer were created from the Forest people, whom weren't just people living in the woods like the Bosmer do, but rather people who alternated between the shapes man, beast and plants.
User avatar
Alba Casas
 
Posts: 3478
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 2:31 pm

Next

Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion