Fulfilled gamer

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 3:39 pm

Seriously, how can anyone go back to Fallout 3 after they played hardcoe mode? IMO, this is the best feature about NV. It adds total immersion, challenge, and for once I actually leveled Survival!

Sorry, this is a bit late, but NV is the best Fallout game ever. I applaud you guys at Obsidian and I wish you guys could develop Fallout 4. Or Bethesda should take pointers on how to write a main quest storyline and how to implement balanced gameplay.

Only thing about New Vegas I didn't like, was Dead Money. lol I played through it once and that was enough. All other DLCs though, amazing. Old World Blues is my favorite. :)

I'm tempted to buy a new computer to buy Fallout 3 just to get a mod that adds a hardcoe mode lol
User avatar
Damien Mulvenna
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 3:33 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 4:43 pm

Seriously, how can anyone go back to Fallout 3 after they played hardcoe mode? IMO, this is the best feature about NV. It adds total immersion, challenge, and for once I actually leveled Survival!
Yuh.
Sorry, this is a bit late, but NV is the best Fallout game ever.
hmmmm... *scratches head*
I applaud you guys at Obsidian and I wish you guys could develop Fallout 4. Or Bethesda should take pointers on how to write a main quest storyline and how to implement balanced gameplay.
Yuh!
Only thing about New Vegas I didn't like, was Dead Money. lol I played through it once and that was enough.
Awh.
All other DLCs though, amazing. Old World Blues is my favorite. :smile:
I'm tempted to buy a new computer to buy Fallout 3 just to get a mod that adds a hardcoe mode lol
Yuh.
User avatar
Adam Baumgartner
 
Posts: 3344
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:12 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 7:17 am

Yuh.

hmmmm... *scratches head*

Yuh!

Awh.

Yuh.

Hannibal, your verbosity and erudition never ceases to amaze me! :foodndrink:
User avatar
Multi Multi
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 4:07 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 6:54 am

Before you go through the trouble of buying a new computer, go and buy Fallout, Fallout 2 and Tactics. I bet you will love New Vegas even more after you play them. :fallout:
User avatar
Jonathan Montero
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 3:22 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 4:33 pm

Before you go through the trouble of buying a new computer, go and buy Fallout, Fallout 2 and Tactics. I bet you will love New Vegas even more after you play them. :fallout:

I agree, I definitely got a lot more out of New Vegas once I played the originals.
User avatar
Bereket Fekadu
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:41 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 4:47 pm

Hannibal, your verbosity and erudition never ceases to amaze me! :foodndrink:
Yuh.
User avatar
jodie
 
Posts: 3494
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 8:42 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 3:27 pm

I agree, I definitely got a lot more out of New Vegas once I played the originals.

U really should buy em. Maybe ull even prefer them to the recent ones!(I sure did)
User avatar
Eoh
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 6:03 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 5:20 pm

Played every Fallout game. Still love NV.
User avatar
Latino HeaT
 
Posts: 3402
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:21 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 7:02 am

Played every Fallout game. Still love NV.

:foodndrink: :fallout:
User avatar
Queen of Spades
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 12:06 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 6:34 am

Yuh.
*slight head nod*
Indeed [/teal'c]
User avatar
Emma Louise Adams
 
Posts: 3527
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:15 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 10:03 pm

*slight head nod*
Indeed [/teal'c]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtPgr94VYA4
User avatar
Amysaurusrex
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:45 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 4:22 pm

I completely agree, hardcoe mode is amazing. I played NV before F3 so when I did start up F3 it seemed to be lacking that feeling that hardcoe brought, being able to only use doctors bags and a few other treatments to fix crippled limbs makes you slow down and think before running into a shoot out, IMO.
While I'm here I guess I'll ask, dies anyone think we will see a sequel to the NV story? I dint want to discuss Bethesdas' legal issues just if there are any real opinions as to why they wouldn't, it almost seems like a given right? Tons of people enjoyed the he'll out if it far more than F3, so why not let the players have what they want. The people who liked F3 over NV are still going to get F4, so no harm done :)
Everybody WINS!! It's like the stars are shining a bit brighter now, lol!
User avatar
Jenna Fields
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 11:36 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 8:34 pm

While I'm here I guess I'll ask, dies anyone think we will see a sequel to the NV story? I dint want to discuss Bethesdas' legal issues just if there are any real opinions as to why they wouldn't, it almost seems like a given right? Tons of people enjoyed the he'll out if it far more than F3, so why not let the players have what they want. The people who liked F3 over NV are still going to get F4, so no harm done :smile:
Everybody WINS!! It's like the stars are shining a bit brighter now, lol!
I really hope they don't make one that directly ties to New Vegas. I'd prefer if they moved the next game to a completely different area and maybe make passing references to the Mojave. If they made a direct sequel of the story then that would mean that they would have to make one canon ending of New Vegas which would be a bit disappointing to me.
User avatar
Ice Fire
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:27 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 5:10 pm

I completely agree, hardcoe mode is amazing. I played NV before F3 so when I did start up F3 it seemed to be lacking that feeling that hardcoe brought, being able to only use doctors bags and a few other treatments to fix crippled limbs makes you slow down and think before running into a shoot out, IMO.
While I'm here I guess I'll ask, dies anyone think we will see a sequel to the NV story? I dint want to discuss Bethesdas' legal issues just if there are any real opinions as to why they wouldn't, it almost seems like a given right? Tons of people enjoyed the he'll out if it far more than F3, so why not let the players have what they want. The people who liked F3 over NV are still going to get F4, so no harm done :smile:
Everybody WINS!! It's like the stars are shining a bit brighter now, lol!

Only if obsidian would do ALL of the writing, cause, lets be honest, bethesdas' writers are awfull when comparred to obsidians and ods are high that the next fallouts will be bethesda only, which means, no obsidians, which means no Sawyer, no Avellone and especially no Tim Cain (Tim Cain only created Fallout!).

Basicly, no. Go play FO3 and then FO:NV and compare the writing and ull probably come to the conclusion that Bethesda will kill the progress (in terms of writing) that Obsidian made, just like they did in Broken Steel
User avatar
Marquis deVille
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:24 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 12:47 pm

Meh, Fallout 1 will always be my favorite Fallout, followed by Fallout 3. Both are rather lacking in certain fields (gameplay for Fallout 1, dialogue for Fallout 3) but they have that post-apocalyptic mystique that I fell in love with when I first started the first game and wandered out of Vault 13.


New Vegas is a great game but hardly my favorite Fallout. It has become too different, maybe that's why Avellone wants to nuke everything and start over from what I hear.


Also note that many of New Vegas' better aspects wouldn't be without Fallout 3 mods. Any PC user can see where things like weapon mods and hardcoe mode come from.
User avatar
Bryanna Vacchiano
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 9:54 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 1:01 pm

obsidian doesn't know how to make an open world game...the game world is way too empty, no buildings to explore or fight in, there isn't anything remotely random in the game, nothing respawns, its all scripted, there's no exploration cause there's isn't anything to explore, 99% of the map is empty, almost no human enemies to fight. its not a fluid and dynamic game world, its very static and thats exaclty why it was only 20 dollars less than 2 months after it came out, they had to almost give the game away just to make it look viable.
User avatar
Chavala
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 5:28 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 10:06 pm

obsidian doesn't know how to make an open world game...the game world is way too empty, no buildings to explore or fight in, there isn't anything remotely random in the game, nothing respawns, its all scripted, there's no exploration cause there's isn't anything to explore, 99% of the map is empty, almost no human enemies to fight. its not a fluid and dynamic game world, its very static and thats exaclty why it was only 20 dollars less than 2 months after it came out, they had to almost give the game away just to make it look viable.
Once again, the Ignorance of your post has shown itself.
User avatar
SexyPimpAss
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:24 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 8:29 pm

obsidian doesn't know how to make an open world game...the game world is way too empty, no buildings to explore or fight in, there isn't anything remotely random in the game, nothing respawns, its all scripted, there's no exploration cause there's isn't anything to explore, 99% of the map is empty, almost no human enemies to fight. its not a fluid and dynamic game world, its very static and thats exaclty why it was only 20 dollars less than 2 months after it came out, they had to almost give the game away just to make it look viable.

:facepalm: Uhh, they did an amazing job with Bethesda's resources and terrible engine. They stayed true to the originals, yeah there was better Fallouts before Fallout 3.. Hence the 3 next to Fallout in Fallout 3, it had options and it defined "RPG". If you would just take two minutes to actually explore and understand why it is like the way it is you will be pleased. I have read alot of your posts and you seem to know nothing of Fallout. Sorry Nevada is a desert, sorry it is supposedly 99% empty, full of anticipation and fear, sorry the multiple endings and player choices are not up to par with you, sorry the Enclave didn't magically appear as a large faction, though it was back in the older games. Fallout New Vegas was a step in the right direction, Fallout 3 was good game, not a good Fallout game. The only good writing Bethesda EVER did with Fallout was The Pitt.
User avatar
Kevin Jay
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:29 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 10:16 am

obsidian doesn't know how to make an open world game...the game world is way too empty, no buildings to explore or fight in, there isn't anything remotely random in the game, nothing respawns, its all scripted, there's no exploration cause there's isn't anything to explore, 99% of the map is empty, almost no human enemies to fight. its not a fluid and dynamic game world, its very static and thats exaclty why it was only 20 dollars less than 2 months after it came out, they had to almost give the game away just to make it look viable.

Why are you making popularity references on every single thread in the NEW VEGAS section? :swear: If you don't like the game, complain about it on the Skyrim forums. The avid posters on New Vegas forums aren't going to join your anti-fallout rally.

As for open world. It's a WASTELAND. It's been nuked. Did you expect a nice little town in every single corner? Cause I guarantee, there's not. It isn't supposed to be beautiful, like Skyrim. It's supposed to be post-apocalyptic.

Fallout New Vegas had a better story, imho, and Fallout 3 had a better environment. And that includes the DLC's. I very much enjoyed the divide as well as I enjoyed the Pitt and Point Lookout.
User avatar
keri seymour
 
Posts: 3361
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:09 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 11:38 am

obsidian doesn't know how to make an open world game...the game world is way too empty, no buildings to explore or fight in, there isn't anything remotely random in the game, nothing respawns, its all scripted, there's no exploration cause there's isn't anything to explore, 99% of the map is empty, almost no human enemies to fight. its not a fluid and dynamic game world, its very static and thats exaclty why it was only 20 dollars less than 2 months after it came out, they had to almost give the game away just to make it look viable.
Stop posting in this side of the forums troll.
User avatar
JUDY FIGHTS
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 4:25 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 2:38 pm

Stop posting in this side of the forums troll.
new vegas is boring and thats why game sales tanked immediately after it came out and they had to give the game away for 20 dollars cause it wasn't selling very well. its not a popular game.
User avatar
Jessica Colville
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:53 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 9:12 pm

new vegas is boring and thats why game sales tanked immediately after it came out and they had to give the game away for 20 dollars cause it wasn't selling very well. its not a popular game.

You're wasting your time on this side of the forum. He's right. You aren't impressing anyone by saying the same thing over and over on every F.O.N.V forum in existence.

Find better ways to spend your life, man.
User avatar
Ashley Hill
 
Posts: 3516
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 5:27 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 7:43 pm

new vegas is boring and thats why game sales tanked immediately after it came out and they had to give the game away for 20 dollars cause it wasn't selling very well. its not a popular game.

Um... no they tanked because of Bethesda deadline. Bethesda's deadline left the most bugs in a game in 2011. Go back to Skyrim.
User avatar
Dark Mogul
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:51 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 3:44 pm

Um... no they tanked because of Bethesda deadline. Bethesda's deadline left the most bugs in a game in 2011. You should check out my sig. It seems spot on right now.

Hahahaha I love your sig its so true :tops:
User avatar
Shianne Donato
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 5:55 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 6:59 am

new vegas is boring and thats why game sales tanked immediately after it came out and they had to give the game away for 20 dollars cause it wasn't selling very well. its not a popular game.
You don't like New Vegas, good for you. I still don't understand why you are continually spreading hate over this whole forum.

Stop using sales as "proof" that everyone thinks like you. Sales didn't tank after it came out and it doesn't matter that it's not doing as well as Skyrim. Are you honestly going to care if the game that you really love playing isn't popular? I listen to a band called Die Mannequin and they may not be very well known, but I love them. I just watched a documentary called This Film is Not Yet Rated and not many people have heard of it, but it's a damned good film. Taste is very subjective, stop insulting ours.
User avatar
k a t e
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:00 am

Next

Return to Fallout: New Vegas