fun facts about crysis

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:59 pm

In my opinion there are worse things than some stupid textures = broken multiplayer, hackers, and loads of bugs.
Although i do care that we should be delivered the promise of dx10/11 in the near future, arguing over who has the best graphics when zooming on a leaf is plain stupid =/

Agreed. You graphic whores need to get your priorites straight. There is so many **** bugs which need to be fixed first (like losing nano catalyst in single player).
User avatar
Laura Samson
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:36 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:28 am

Unfair comparison because you dont have crysis 1 completely maxed out, and even then it STILL looks better. The lighting especially is so much more advanced in crysis 1, crysis 2 has very simple and ugly lighting. Also the buildings look like plastic. And physics? Absolute garbage in crysis 2, wooden boxes are indestructible and even a simple kiosk doesn't fall apart even if you fire a rocket at it. Just accept it man, crysis 1 is still the most technologically advanced game to date. End of story.
User avatar
Sabrina garzotto
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 4:58 pm

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:58 pm

Unfair comparison because you dont have crysis 1 completely maxed out,
LMFAO what ever you say buddy
try reading threw this thread before making stupid comments


And to other biching about not about graphics obviously this thread was made towards the "graphics whores" go post in threads that fit your needs and not infect every thread with your BS
User avatar
Heather M
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:40 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 2:37 am

Ohhhh, so the soup cans in Crysis 1 are lower res then the Marines in Crysis 2? I was not expecting that...

Seriously though, a zoom in of reloading the Scar's grenade launcher attachment compared to like, a rock in Crysis 1? Doesn't really constitute a good comparison. You have to compare similar things in both games. The final release of Crysis 2 looks surprisingly lower detail then the development images.

The only things that might be better are Marine/Cell uniforms, and weapons.

Crysis, the first one, had better detail textures then Crysis 2 hands down. I mean, look at this:

http://img857.imageshack.us/img857/1642/screenshot0000.jpg

Compared to this:

http://img835.imageshack.us/img835/153/crysis22011032615270927.png

http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/1408/crysis22011032615273578.png

More comparisons here:

http://www.crymod.com/thread.php?threadid=67659&sid=c9f9f93211dde7933d0b1f2575e785bf

It actually looks like a step back from the months old prerelease screenshots:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4227541/ce3_waves.jpg

The final game:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4227541/c2_waves.jpg

Remember that train station trailer that was released like... months ago? Particularly the part when he kicks the door down? And the plasma mortars flying over the glass ceiling?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVIJPP1ReMk

Did it look anything as good in the final game? No, and keep in mind that trailer was released 8 months ago. What were they doing for 8 months?
User avatar
Misty lt
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 10:06 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 7:14 am

I don't see why you all believe crysis 2 looks better, It's just polished. I like the way it looks but crysis 2 did look alot better, OP you can't just pick the worst textures of a game and compare them to the best of another, I don't show a picture of a blurred out cow then put another non covered one next to it.
User avatar
Franko AlVarado
 
Posts: 3473
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 7:49 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 2:58 am

^What he said.

A Closeup of a SCAR reloading it's grenade launcher will of course have higher res textures then... A soup can, no matter which two games are being compared. The ground in Crysis 2 doesn't look as good as the Ground in Crysis 1 because the textures are lower res.
User avatar
Jessica Lloyd
 
Posts: 3481
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 2:11 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 5:58 am

Thank god someone on this forum with some logic! People ignore the amazing lighting and shadows being cast all over the place, crazy detail all over, etc and find like a mailbox without a bump-map and start screaming CONSOLE PORT!

Crysis 2 looks amazing! I dont want DX11. DX11 does not magically make a game good, artists and coders do. If we get it sure it will be nice, but its no biggie.
User avatar
Crystal Birch
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:34 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 7:22 am

OP must be retarded. Notice how they got 100+ FPS? Obviously it's not on max settings retard.
User avatar
Marine x
 
Posts: 3327
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 4:54 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:39 am

OP must be retarded. Notice how they got 100+ FPS? Obviously it's not on max settings retard.
LOL i have 2 480 SLI OC 980x@4.4ghz and pics are close to wall so naturally FPS will go up

Idiot
User avatar
Jani Eayon
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:19 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:37 am

Unfair comparison because you dont have crysis 1 completely maxed out,
LMFAO what ever you say buddy
try reading threw this thread before making stupid comments

And to other biching about not about graphics obviously this thread was made towards the "graphics whores" go post in threads that fit your needs and not infect every thread with your BS

Name threads where I've talked about graphics. If you look around, you'll see I never have commented. Really, I'm just tired of all the whining about them as if they're 8 bit or something. So yes, I'm infecting this thread 'with my BS' because I'm sick of people like you or the others ranting on Crysis 1 having better graphics than this game.

The bugs are the problems that we should be really whining about to Crytek!
User avatar
Laura Richards
 
Posts: 3468
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:42 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 5:07 am

misssread

User avatar
Logan Greenwood
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 5:41 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:35 am

Name threads where I've talked about graphics?
You're either stupid or so arrogant you think the world revolves around you or have a serious case of ADD read again

I did not make this thread in your behalf

I never claimed that you did idiot. Like I said, I'm tired of you dikes just biching about the graphics all the time. Therefore, I gave my opinion in my original post.

EDIT: The reason I said that statement you cherry picked was to show that this is my first time commenting on the whole thing.

User avatar
SUck MYdIck
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:43 am

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:12 pm

actually Kaibah i miss understood and im an idiot...sorry
got confused with who i was talking about becasue when you quoted it had the other guys name
User avatar
Ruben Bernal
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 5:58 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:05 am

It's ok. At least you acknowledge you had made a mistake. There are many people out there who have such huge egos they wouldn't even do that.

Just to be clear, that's a compliment. =]
User avatar
Breautiful
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:51 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:04 pm

It's ok. At least you acknowledge you had made a mistake. There are many people out there who have such huge egos they wouldn't even do that.

Just to be clear, that's a compliment. =]
Yea no ego really i just get annoyed with all "experts" talking down about the graphics/lighting on crysis 2 and when in fact crysis vanilla was pretty much the same if not better. allot have been playing modded version for so long seriously lost touch with what it looked like originally.
That was the whole purpose of this thread not that that's all that important

And i agree the game has bugs

water under the bridge :)

User avatar
James Rhead
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:32 am

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:37 pm

Of course Crysis 2 looks better. Its 4 years newer xD. People who say its worse just dont understand nothing and are very narrow-minded. Probably because they got disappointed about something else and everything just seems bad for them now.
User avatar
Alkira rose Nankivell
 
Posts: 3417
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:56 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:14 pm

Yes Jatriix, that must be it.

One Gunner, how about we play a little game, you take a screenshot of a texture in Crysis 2, and I (and hopefully others) will respond with similar examples from Crysis or Warhead. Whoever comes up with the highest number of better looking images wins. Must be texture, and not lighting based images.

Thank god someone on this forum with some logic! People ignore the amazing lighting and shadows being cast all over the place, crazy detail all over, etc and find like a mailbox without a bump-map and start screaming CONSOLE PORT!
Yeah, but this thread is about textures silly goose. There are other threads YOU ignored when those same people that understandably criticized the textures (including myself) were quick to turn around and mention the impressive lighting and HDR effects.

Also, the bump mapped mailbox was the thing the guy that took the picture said was good, it was the street sign with appx. 17.3 pixels in it that made it look like a console port, because when your sitting 10 feet away from your screen, 17.3 pixels looks good.

Crysis 2 looks amazing! I dont want DX11.
Oh.

Are you sure? I mean, it makes things look better. The only 'not biggie' here is that they could have spent another few days implementing DX11. The game actually looked better 8 months ago in that Central Station trailer when the guy fights the pinger, maybe they had DX11 back then.

DX11 does not magically make a game good, artists and coders do. If we get it sure it will be nice, but its no biggie.
Right, unless they promise it to entice people to buy it, and then not hold true to their promise. Also, that's kinda like saying it's not the materials that makes art good, it's the artist, even when he's using crayon and finger paint to sculpt Michelangelo's David.
User avatar
ONLY ME!!!!
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 12:16 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:42 am

Of course Crysis 2 looks better. Its 4 years newer xD. People who say its worse just dont understand nothing and are very narrow-minded. Probably because they got disappointed about something else and everything just seems bad for them now.
Not sure if troll or just very stupid.
User avatar
Eric Hayes
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:57 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:10 am

This isn`t only about graphics comparsion between C1 & C2 , people are angry about the promisses & lies of Crytek , PC users used to trust Crytek`s promisses before the 25th march . They broke the greatest promise.
C2 won`t be a port from console it will be port to console . What people got is console port.SO put this screens comprasion into your ass.Nobody have ever seen DX11 screenshots from C2,so people don`t expect it to be DX11 based game. And don`t forget Microsoft made a deal with Crytek back then when C1 came out to make more sales on Vista , so DX9 was limited ,instead of pushing DX9 to it`s maximum they`ve made a DX10. So to me this grafics you show on screens could be made in time of C1.What i want to see is Crysis DX11 based and not damn Console Port which it is.Screw Crytek

my head exploded out of rage, you write like a 10 year old
User avatar
Robyn Lena
 
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 6:17 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:48 am

Can I just leave this here?

http://vghq.net/2011/03/28/crysis-2-textures-are-12-size-of-crysis-1-proof/
User avatar
Kelly Upshall
 
Posts: 3475
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 6:26 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:44 am

my face when op is retarded..

Image

Close up picks from random objects in crysis VS. Random evironment pics from Crysis 2 with lots of blurry edges and no POM..
User avatar
DAVId MArtInez
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:16 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:07 am

http://www.gamesas.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=16134
User avatar
Siidney
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 11:54 pm

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:25 pm

my face when op is retarded..

Image

Close up picks from random objects in crysis VS. Random evironment pics from Crysis 2 with lots of blurry edges and no POM..
LOL, Well, he did convincingly prove the soup cans in Crysis 1 are lower resolution then the SCAR in Crysis 2.
User avatar
Manuel rivera
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:12 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:28 am

crysis 2 has better gi that makes frame look realistic and has more bloom on pc which give it an illusion of being better pc..........just tricks.....and bad textures
User avatar
Anna Beattie
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 4:59 am

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:04 pm

my face when op is retarded..

Image

Close up picks from random objects in crysis VS. Random evironment pics from Crysis 2 with lots of blurry edges and no POM..
LOL, Well, he did convincingly prove the soup cans in Crysis 1 are lower resolution then the SCAR in Crysis 2.
Welcome to crysis 3! Eat soup with high quality textures!
User avatar
Jessica Colville
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:53 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Crysis

cron