fun facts about crysis

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:49 am

People talk about crysis 2 having **** textures lets see some crysis

http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/1123/crysis2011032400503293.jpg

http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/2446/crysis2011032416392415.jpg


http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/7184/crysis2011032416395139.jpg

http://img840.imageshack.us/img840/2593/crysis64201103232348293.jpg


wow looks great huh

Now people are saying well it might have **** textures also but crysis 2 lighting isnt accurate that crysis 2 uses light tricks
..ok lets see how accurate crysis lighting is


note the light reflection on the ground
on pic 1-2 and then 3-4


1
http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/8403/crysis2011032600083891.jpg
2
http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/7656/crysis2011032600084950.jpg



3
http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/8527/crysis2011032600090352.jpg

4
http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/8025/crysis2011032600091011.jpg


people need to get a clue crysis is far from perfect

User avatar
Charlie Sarson
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 12:38 pm

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:49 pm

Wait wut? Are you trolling? Those leaves in crysis 1 look better than any close up texture in crysis 2 released YEARS after the first one. This game is a failboat.
User avatar
Ludivine Dupuy
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:51 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:10 am

LOL yea OK here are crysis 2

LOL compare leaves to this pic
http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/9940/crysis22011032311275174.jpg


http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/3497/crysis22011032311210878.jpg

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/3707/crysis22011032311251710.jpg

http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/4092/crysis22011032311254665.jpg

http://img850.imageshack.us/img850/3190/crysis22011032311285257.jpg

User avatar
I’m my own
 
Posts: 3344
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:55 am

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:22 pm

Also how am i trolling
last time i checked this is a crysis 2 forum not crysis
want to ee a troll take a look in the mirror
User avatar
Roberto Gaeta
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 2:23 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:13 pm

Indeed crysis 2 does look absolutely amazing, better than crysis 1. Crytek did wonders with this game. Even with just dx9 at the moment its one of the best looking games out.
User avatar
Imy Davies
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:42 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:12 am

Honestly, Crysis 2 looks pretty amazing, especially considering you've only seen it on DX9. That's a comparison between Crysis DX10 and Crysis 2 DX9. Just wait for an update on DX11. People are complaining before they've seen everything
User avatar
Motionsharp
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 1:33 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:48 am

If they had actually unleashed the full power of this engine, instead of making sure the game would be the same across all platforms, we could see something with the huge open worlds and amazing graphics we've come to expect from crytek. But they had to linit themselves a bit and contain it in small easily streamed chunks that the consoles could handle with their limited RAM.

I'm sure the engine is capable of some amazing things, but until someone makes a PC exclusive game on it, with the power of our rigs in mind, we won't see the true power of their CryEngine 3
User avatar
Chris Ellis
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:00 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:29 am

Im sure crytek has good stuff in store for PC hopefully all the criticism doesn't turn them away
User avatar
trisha punch
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 5:38 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:25 am

This isn`t only about graphics comparsion between C1 & C2 , people are angry about the promisses & lies of Crytek , PC users used to trust Crytek`s promisses before the 25th march . They broke the greatest promise.
C2 won`t be a port from console it will be port to console . What people got is console port.SO put this screens comprasion into your ass.Nobody have ever seen DX11 screenshots from C2,so people don`t expect it to be DX11 based game. And don`t forget Microsoft made a deal with Crytek back then when C1 came out to make more sales on Vista , so DX9 was limited ,instead of pushing DX9 to it`s maximum they`ve made a DX10. So to me this grafics you show on screens could be made in time of C1.What i want to see is Crysis DX11 based and not damn Console Port which it is.Screw Crytek
User avatar
Madison Poo
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 9:09 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:44 am

This isn`t only about graphics comparsion between C1 & C2 , people are angry about the promisses & lies of Crytek , PC users used to trust Crytek`s promisses before the 25th march . They broke the greatest promise.
C2 won`t be a port from console it will be port to console . What people got is console port.SO put this screens comprasion into your ass
Well my post is to those complaining about graphics so you didn't really need to throw your 2 cents in!!!
Countless threads about graphics low rez textures and **** lighting now GTFO and go cry somewhere else before i decide to put those comparison pics up your ass
And FYI crytek never made any promises
...also learn how to spell

User avatar
Maddy Paul
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:20 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:54 am

Now compare destructible environments and physics...
User avatar
Batricia Alele
 
Posts: 3360
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:12 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:45 am

Now compare destructible environments and physics...
omg you guys are Fuc**ing ridicules im not posting up videos of physics in crysis 2 it is there if you actually played THE GAME
yes not to the extent to crysis 1 but who give a **** this is a city not a lush jungle filled with plenty of lush foliage to blow around in the wind and explosions and cheap shacks the blow apart with grenades.
AGIAN its a city with structural sky-rise buildings
User avatar
Neko Jenny
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:29 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:46 am

You do realize those pictures aren't on max settings, don't you?
User avatar
Haley Cooper
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:30 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:24 am

how much you want to bet they are even if they were not it wont help those textures
you really want me to go take screen shots with my 2 480 at 1080 with 16QAA
User avatar
Nany Smith
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 5:36 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:10 pm

I think people have romanticized crysis 1. They think no game will ever look better when it obviously has its faults
User avatar
Lisa Robb
 
Posts: 3542
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:13 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:10 am

....

User avatar
Damien Mulvenna
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 3:33 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:56 am

You do realize those pictures aren't on max settings, don't you?

LMFAO How the hell do you guys praise that game so much but at the same time know nothing about it

here are my screens at 1080 very high 16Qxaa LOL nice textures


http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/1016/crysis2011032602393110.jpg

http://img837.imageshack.us/img837/5403/crysis2011032602395240.jpg
User avatar
jessica robson
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:54 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 5:54 am

Indeed crysis 2 does look absolutely amazing, better than crysis 1. Crytek did wonders with this game. Even with just dx9 at the moment its one of the best looking games out.

Lol, I really wonder how much they payed you people for your souls.

Are you on Bobby Kotick's salary BTW?
User avatar
Sophie Louise Edge
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:09 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 7:14 am


Are you on Bobby Kotick's salary BTW?
?

edit
nvermind
User avatar
Emily Rose
 
Posts: 3482
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:56 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 5:24 am

Crysis 1 and 2 have almost identical resolution textures but Crysis 1 is a 4 year older game.... Hmm....
User avatar
ashleigh bryden
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 5:43 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:14 am

In my opinion there are worse things than some stupid textures = broken multiplayer, hackers, and loads of bugs.
Although i do care that we should be delivered the promise of dx10/11 in the near future, arguing over who has the best graphics when zooming on a leaf is plain stupid =/
User avatar
Andy durkan
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 3:05 pm

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:32 pm

Now compare destructible environments and physics...
omg you guys are Fuc**ing ridicules im not posting up videos of physics in crysis 2 it is there if you actually played THE GAME
yes not to the extent to crysis 1 but who give a **** this is a city not a lush jungle filled with plenty of lush foliage to blow around in the wind and explosions and cheap shacks the blow apart with grenades.
AGIAN its a city with structural sky-rise buildings

And yet, when i throw grenades or shoot up wooden crates and carboard boxes they just bounce around rather than shattering like in Crysis 1.
Bus stops won't even budge an inch from a grenade blast.

And you know what the real sad thing is? CryEngine 3 showcased destructible environments so much superior in every way to the original Crysis... in Crysis 2 footage..... on Console even.
User avatar
Joey Avelar
 
Posts: 3370
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 11:11 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:46 am

This isn`t only about graphics comparsion between C1 & C2 , people are angry about the promisses & lies of Crytek , PC users used to trust Crytek`s promisses before the 25th march . They broke the greatest promise.
C2 won`t be a port from console it will be port to console . What people got is console port.SO put this screens comprasion into your ass.Nobody have ever seen DX11 screenshots from C2,so people don`t expect it to be DX11 based game. And don`t forget Microsoft made a deal with Crytek back then when C1 came out to make more sales on Vista , so DX9 was limited ,instead of pushing DX9 to it`s maximum they`ve made a DX10. So to me this grafics you show on screens could be made in time of C1.What i want to see is Crysis DX11 based and not damn Console Port which it is.Screw Crytek

This is so true!
User avatar
George PUluse
 
Posts: 3486
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:20 pm

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:47 pm

Ok since its not about graphics how bout this comparision to crysis-
Lost the large map land/air/sea/foot combat
Lost more control of nano suit
--Run and speed boost used to be 2 different things
--Could set power mode as a dedicated mode (was useful with melee combat)
Loss of gameplay controls- (controllers are limited to how many buttons/functions they can do)
No more Prone
No more Lean
Zoom/Melee share a key:S?

As for the graphics, not many AAA titles released to the PC these days dont have an option to use more than one DX mode.

Crysis 1 did set a high standard to meet but really what did this game bring to the table thats new or innovating, slide?? Another loss that should be noted more than anything is the loss of faith from the players that made the original game popular enough to warrant a sequel, the PC player base. All just to make an extra buck by releasing it to 3 platforms. I know people, including myself (have PC), that would buy a console version of crysis if it was ported over. I now know more people that won't bother buying crysis 2 after finding out what was lost from the original.
User avatar
Amysaurusrex
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:45 pm

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:21 pm

Its funny how many people complain about missing DX11 support .. maybe they should read some facts about DirectX 11 .. DirectX 11 doesnt make games look better ;)
You can make the same level of detail with DX9 .. but hey .. "Crysis 2 doesnt support DX11 > im not gonna buy it" > LOL
User avatar
Hannah Barnard
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 9:42 am

Next

Return to Crysis