But remember, in Bones, everyone who knew how to make the armor dies, and thus the method is forgotten until later, where it was reinvented, as mentioned by the storyteller himself.
True, and of course the whole story needs to be taken with a grain of salt in terms of lore accuracy, because, well, if everyone who witnessed it died, then they have no way of knowing if ANY of it was true - although I suppose somebody could have found the armor later on - I mean, it's made of bone, and bone preserves pretty well, especially in dry climates like the Ashlands.
The other iffy part about this book (and the others in the series: "Hallgerd's Tale" and "Vernaccus and Bourlor") is that it's a story within a story (within yet another story for us folks outside of the ES universe). So who knows how much of the detail is supposed to be made up by Hallgerd, how much made up by Tavi Dromio, and how much based on actual (in-universe) events? When of course, all of it is made up by whichever Bethesda dev wrote these particular books...
None of which brings us any closer to figuring out if there's a connection between the armor and the Argonian slave, of course. It seems to me like they wouldn't have given them the same name if it weren't for a reason though. And the fact that we do have a translation from an official source (even if it's not in the game) does tend to draw more attention to it - though of course the source doesn't say
what language it is, but we do know (from Haj'Ei/Hides-His-Eyes) that the common English-language Argonian names are just translations from their Argonian counterparts, though I'm pretty sure there are no other cases where we know both the English and Argonian names for a single individual.