» Sat May 17, 2014 11:25 pm
Oh, I have no doubt that part of what he became was because of circumstance, but for me his ends don't justify his means, and it's hard for me to feel anything but anger when I think about his character. In the beginning of danaerys's POV chapters she is afraid of her brother hurting her, not just emotionally, but physically beating her (incurring the wrath of the dragon). Him selling his sister is cruelty, he may not believe it is slavery, but he does believe she nothing more than a tool to increase his power. He uses his "supposed" power as rightful heir to the iron throne to emotionally and physically dominate his younger and impressionable sister. His cruelty to her runs so deep that before she met Drogo, she believed Viserys was right in his actions, that she deserved what Viserys was doing to her. All because for a while Viserys's dominance was the only thing she viewed as right and just. His actions toward her are irredeemable in my eyes.
that's one thing I actually dislike about the show. they didnt convey how terrible Viserys actually is to her.
But I am of the opinion he would not be much different if Aerys had lived and kept the throne. If Rhaegar had still died in battle with Robert, and Viserys inherited the throne I think we'd have just seen a more explosive rebellion against an even more paranoid and corrupt king had viserys succeeded the throne.
I'm not trying to convince anyone that my opinion is correct, and I actually really like your anolysis of his character, I'm just saying that for me, he is my most hated character in the books. Even the Hound has more redeeming qualities for me than Viserys in my view, and the hound killed children, and expressed his own wanting to [censored] a child (not that I believe Viserys would be averse top doing those things, either.)