PC Gaming is OFFICIALLY dead

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:48 pm

@rabish12 So what are you trying to suggest that we throw our PCs out the window and replace them with console(s)!?!?! :huh:

I think he's saying that while PC gaming isn't dead, and is perfectly fine, your points are ridiculous.
User avatar
Anne marie
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 1:05 pm

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:16 pm

@rabish12 So what are you trying to suggest that we throw our PCs out the window and replace them with console(s)!?!?! :huh:

I guess giving my 360 away and buying a PC was a bad Idea?
:sadvaultboy:

boo hoo
:cry: :shakehead:
With all this dying pc gaming has been doing for the past 10+ years it sure is going strong.
User avatar
Causon-Chambers
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 11:47 pm

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 7:26 pm

Captain Picard is SO better than Captain Kirk!

As long as were calling "official" shots on entire industries, I declare that gasoline powered cars are OFFICIALLY obsolete!
User avatar
Sandeep Khatkar
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:02 am

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 4:33 am

I think he's saying that while PC gaming isn't dead, and is perfectly fine, your points are ridiculous.

Exactly my point. :thumbsup:
:cookie:
User avatar
Heather Stewart
 
Posts: 3525
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 11:04 pm

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:22 am

Is this a joke? Cuz I'm laughing.
User avatar
Tyler F
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 8:07 pm

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:20 am

Right, PC gaming is dead because you can play new games on a 4 year old computer... Right.
What next? Toaster ovens svck because you have an older one that still works? Damn those companies not making us shell out $1000's of dollars each year.
User avatar
Amanda savory
 
Posts: 3332
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 10:37 am

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:40 am

Ah, Bethesda Forums. How I've missed your... Fascinating arguments. If this can even be called an argument, anyway.
User avatar
Bonnie Clyde
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 10:02 pm

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:28 pm

If PC gaming died, it would soon be reinvented. If there is a platform in a sufficient number of homes on which it's possible to play games, people will. Personally, I'd say that versatility and freedom are the qualities that make PC gaming my preference.
User avatar
Tyrone Haywood
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:10 am

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:35 am

Ha Ha... my poor boy you have not seen the golden land of Steam. With mounds of deals and sales with which to whet your whistle with. We are in a renaissance of PC gaming, and things have never looked better, figuratively speaking. Now we can find incredibly niche or old games right at the tips of our fingers and enjoy the wonders of the past. We can look forward to such packs as the humble indie bundles with their great gameplay. We have Crysis for the graphics hoars. Then the sheer utility of a PC is stunning. I can use it for anything, and I can learn almost as much from it. If you know where to look. It all has a very big price to get into this club. Gaming Rig, monthly internet, and any other charges. But by god once your here on a PC you are only limited by your imagination. Games are just the tip of the iceberg. Too many good years of gaming on the PC and to Steam! :foodndrink:
User avatar
Bitter End
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:40 am

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:33 am

Trumpeting that a PC game is poorly optimized enough that his machine can't run it is kind of ridiculous in a thread about how PC gaming is dying/dead.

I think its just graphically intense, not a opti issue.

You mean 1920x1080, and there are console games that can do this (and I don't think most gamers on PC can do this with most new games at a solid framerate, honestly). The "stream music from your music library while playing games" thing is actually a standard feature on the 360.

yeah I got two numbers out of place.
All I ever got out of my 360 was upscaled 720 to 1080.
Anyone with a $600 Pc can likely run along side a console.





Again, trumpeting the fact that some PC games don't support broadly-used platforms in a thread about PC gaming being on the decline is a bad idea.

Because not supporting old OS and moving/looking to the future and current O.S is a bad thing right?


"A few people" is a bit of a low estimate on your part.

More people buy than pirate.


Tried to compare PC piracy, where it's possible to pirate software with virtually no effort, to console piracy, which often requires voiding the warranty, cracking the thing open and installing a piece of hardware that you have to pay for, or else sending it off to have that installed at added cost? Yeah, I saw that. I wasn't very impressed, but I saw that.

as if the info and needed items can not be found using google.







GoG is not an indication of the current PC gaming industry being healthy given that the entirety of its catalog consists of old games.

Because people who buy new PC's or own Pc;s NEVER EVER play or buy old games. *roll eyes*
I guess I better delete all the old games off my new PC.







This is false as a matter of fact. PC operating systems in general aren't nearly as limited in scope as the ones used on the consoles. The result is that they're more prone to issues. Prone enough to make it a major issue? No, not really, but your PC certainly isn't "just as stable as any console".

I beg to differ, my pc will with out a doubt far more stable than a console.




Almost like the games you can buy off of the online stores for the Xbox 360, Playstation 3, and Wii. In fact, exactly like the ones you can get on those online stores.

PC D2D and steam sales are far more popular than digital games on the console.

Except, given that the 360 and Windows are handled by different customer support departments in entirely different divisions of Microsoft, this probably isn't true.

Implying windows isn't a massive sales/software/hardware juggernaut and doesn't have heaps of support.
User avatar
Floor Punch
 
Posts: 3568
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:18 am

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:43 am

So gaming is dead because you want shinier graphics and thousands of dollars to spend on new hardware in the next years? I'll remain firmly on my seat then, laughing. ^_^
User avatar
Maria Garcia
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 6:59 am

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:18 pm

http://www.rainymood.com/ http://endlessvideo.com/watch?v=HMnrl0tmd3k Combine the two for an epic classy mood. For those who really aren't at all worried about the situation.
User avatar
vanuza
 
Posts: 3522
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:14 pm

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 4:45 pm

Constantly releasing games that only use the latest technology would be more of a threat to PC gaming,catering to a smaller minority of PC gamers and reducing the profits by making it so most PC users couldn't play at all.
User avatar
Cathrine Jack
 
Posts: 3329
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 1:29 am

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 7:12 am

I had to buy a new PC in order to play "Oblivion" and other games of its generation, but somehow I don't think I will have to upgrade for "Skyrim". I'm not sure why everyone's assuming "Skyrim" will be a leap forward in technology. My PC is only a Dell and it's far from state of the art, but I think it will run this.
User avatar
sas
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 8:40 am

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 7:31 pm

Wow, thank you for telling me this now, I just popped in my new 6970 to find out PC gaming is dead.

/sarcasm

Seriously, PC gaming is not dead. I get 98% of my games on the PC. (Some multiplayer games I get on the Xbox since most people around here play them on there). There is no way I would switch back to a console for Skyrim, or any other game I would play a lot.
User avatar
saxon
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 2:45 am

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:28 am

Exactly my point. :thumbsup:
:cookie:

Your point is that your points are ridiculous? That's interesting.
User avatar
M!KkI
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 7:50 am

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:55 pm

I think its just graphically intense, not a opti issue.

With Metro, I'm fairly certain it's both.

yeah I got two numbers out of place.
All I ever got out of my 360 was upscaled 720 to 1080.
Anyone with a $600 Pc can likely run along side a console.

All you ever assumed you got out of your 360 was upscaled. That doesn't mean that's all you ever got.

Because not supporting old OS and moving/looking to the future and current O.S is a bad thing right?

It was a bad thing when well over half their potential audience was cut in half by doing it, yes. I'm for dropping Windows XP as soon as possible, but it's still not a compelling argument for PC gaming when products are released that cut off such a huge swath of the market.

More people buy than pirate.

This really, really depends on the game. Really. Besides which this really doesn't change the fact that "a few people" is a horrible understatement in terms of piracy.

as if the info and needed items can not be found using google.

Which changes the point I was making, which is that it costs money and takes time and effort... how, exactly?

Because people who buy new PC's or own Pc;s NEVER EVER play or buy old games. *roll eyes*
I guess I better delete all the old games off my new PC.

You seem to be missing the point I was making pretty much entirely. A store that sells literally nothing except old titles doesn't indicate anything about how well the current PC games market is doing. I actually said that explicitly. I used the phrase "current PC gaming industry" in the sentence you quoted. It's like you're not even reading what I'm saying.

I beg to differ, my pc will with out a doubt far more stable than a console.

You can beg to differ all you want. You're still wrong. This isn't a matter of opinion, it's a matter of fact - PC OSes have to do more things, and as a result are invariably less stable. Period. This isn't arguable. It's absolute basic common sense.

PC D2D and steam sales are far more popular than digital games on the console.

I take it you have sales figures for that, then.

Implying windows isn't a massive sales/software/hardware juggernaut and doesn't have heaps of support.

No, stating that support for Windows and support for Xbox 360 isn't the same thing.

Really, really starting to think that there's not much to gain trying to discuss this with you, given that you seem to be barely glancing over my points before responding to them and pretty much all of your responses amount to "PC is better in every way period just because".
User avatar
Bad News Rogers
 
Posts: 3356
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 8:37 am

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 7:17 am

hype
User avatar
Tyrel
 
Posts: 3304
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:52 am

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:25 pm

blah blah, stuff.

I take it you have sales figures for that, then.




Blah blah, more stuff Titan357 doesn't care about.


PC is better in every way period just because".


No, I don;t because I don;t care enough to go find them. If you want to know, go look. I am not google, or a google bot.

Its not Like I used to own a PS3, and a 360.

Thats my weak and shallow straw man agreement.
Pc gaming and Pc's in general are better just because.
1) I owned and hated my 360 (2 RROd 360's) and PS3.(I hate you PS3)
2) I own a great Pc (so far, in 8 years 0% of my Pc;s have failed to work, or gotten RROD/YROD.)
3) I love kb/m and controllers/joysticks.
4) pc gaming is not dead, and has been dying for years.
User avatar
Lyndsey Bird
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:57 am

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 7:07 am

Titan, you basically stopped being worth responding to when you cut a post responding to every one of your points down to the one line you had an actual response to, then even brushed that off with what more or less amounts to "use Google" (spoilers: I track game sales as a hobby - the reason I asked you to provide me sales figures showing that is because I know for a fact that they don't exist, so using Google wouldn't help). Regardless of the state of PC gaming, you haven't really made any legitimate or useful points here and very nearly everything you've said is wrong. I've given reasons why they're wrong, your best response to those reasons consists of "blah blah, stuff" so you clearly know they're wrong as well.
User avatar
stacy hamilton
 
Posts: 3354
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:03 am

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:13 am

Nvm.
I just think it's stupid that you can say PC gaming is dead when there are tons of people that use it. I guess just because you don't like something means that it is dead.
User avatar
D LOpez
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 12:30 pm

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:50 am

Titan, you basically stopped being worth responding to when you cut down a post responding to every one of your points to the one line you had an actual response to, then even brushed that off with what more or less amounts to "use Google" (spoilers: I track game sales as a hobby - the reason I asked you to provide me sales figures showing that is because I know for a fact that they don't exist, so using Google wouldn't help). Regardless of the state of PC gaming, you haven't really made any legitimate or useful points here and very nearly everything you've said is wrong. I've given reasons why they're wrong, your best response to those reasons consists of "blah blah, stuff" so you clearly know they're wrong as well.

No, I clearly don't care.

You have given opinions, I don't care about you're opinion. (spoilers, I am a millionaire space shuttle pilot) Also, you don;t care about mine.

Opinion, you have provided no links or useful info either, and expect me to do so. Ill pass.

rabish12, I am not going to get into a internet E-fight, you feel I am not worth responding to, yet respond anyway? Why?

I like pc's I like gaming on my PC.
Its obvious that PC's are not going anywhere, they are making more then enough money on non gaming things to worry about that.
Pc gaming is not going any where, any time soon. (steam was digital sales alone where about 340 million depending on what year you look at) no developer is going to say "gee herp-a-derp I want to pass on the multi million dollar Pc game market for every game I make from now on"
Pc's always have had PC only games, and so have consoles. just because game X is not on the pc does not mean that pc gaming is dying.
The entire pc gaming hardware market is going strong, so is the software side.




(stupid) Opinions are why we can't have nice things.



Opinions are like *blanks* everyone has one, and they all stink.
User avatar
JAY
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 6:17 am

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:28 am

I would just like to point out that we are all, as we read this topic, technically also dying.

Carry on.
User avatar
Maddy Paul
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:20 pm

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:56 pm

I would just like to point out that we are all, as we read this topic, technically also dying.

Carry on.


so, all of us are officially dead then?
User avatar
Danel
 
Posts: 3417
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:35 pm

Post » Wed Jan 19, 2011 9:02 pm

No, I clearly don't care.

You have given opinions, I don't care about you're opinion. (spoilers, I am a millionaire space shuttle pilot) Also, you don;t care about mine.

Uh, no. Wrong. I'm not responding to your opinions. I don't think I've responded to an opinion of yours at any point in this thread. Opinions are not verifiably true or false, and in these kinds of discussions are generally just statements of preference. What I've been responding to are claims of yours. Those claims are false.

Please don't try to hide behind "opinions" when opinions aren't involved in the discussion just to try and deflect having to either admit that you were wrong or defend what you've claimed.

Opinion, you have provided no links or useful info either, and expect me to do so. Ill pass.

See, just saying that I haven't given any useful info because I said that you haven't doesn't work, particularly when I have given useful info. I've given it multiple times, right from the first page. As for links... well, most of what I've said doesn't actually require links and would be more or less impossible to support with links because it's either basic common sense (that PC OSes are less stable than console OSes, though if you want me to link you to... say, a comparative list of known bugs and glitches in the 360 or PS3 OS and another for Windows 7, I would be glad to) or a response to a ridiculous claim for which there is no link because you more or less made something up and stated it as fact (like that Steam sales do better than PSN/XBLA sales). But if you want links for any of the specific points I've made, feel free to ask. I'll give them.

rabish12, I am not going to get into a internet E-fight, you feel I am not worth responding to, yet respond anyway? Why?

Boredom.

I like pc's I like gaming on my PC.
Its obvious that PC's are not going anywhere, they are making more then enough money on non gaming things to worry about that.
Pc gaming is not going any where, any time soon. (steam was digital sales alone where about 340 million depending on what year you look at) no developer is going to say "gee herp-a-derp I want to pass on the multi million dollar Pc game market for every game I make from now on"
Pc's always have had PC only games, and so have consoles. just because game X is not on the pc does not mean that pc gaming is dying.
The entire pc gaming hardware market is going strong, so is the software side.

None of which makes any of the things that I've responded to true or correct in any way. You're trying to justify yourself by saying that PC gaming isn't dying, therefore everything you've said in support of that is true. That doesn't work. PC gaming isn't dying, but that doesn't change the fact that several of the things you've said are wrong.

Opinions are like *blanks* everyone has one, and they all stink.

And opinions still have absolutely nothing to do with anything I've said in response to your posts.
User avatar
Kelly Tomlinson
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:57 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games