You think it's better for Skyrim to be divided? That's crazy.

I'll just copy what I wrote elsewhere recently, on the subject of strategic interest. Not that it's new around here.

Did I say it was better for skyrim? Nope, but it makes skyrim more interesting and that way we don't have to get annoyed by MORE VAGUE LORE which is a huge problem in skyrim.

Translation: The Dunmer conquer a disunited Skyrim.

I'd rather they didn't, the only land I want the Dunmer to take back is any land that the argonians might have taken. I'd rather the Dunmer build up a strong Resdayn again and rebuild their glorious cities and become a dominant economic power due to the various goods morrowind holds.

Cider! would like that, lol.

I prefer vague over silly.

The Nords are proud people who deserve to thrive and make their own decisions
yes
no
no
no
tradition
no
freedom
no
no

The easiest question was the first one.

The other questions are irrelevant, as they pertain to a society that is reminiscent of vicious goblins, who deserve to be enslaved and fed to Alduin's children for their blasphemes and blatant heretical mortal hero worship. And then have their false claim to Atmoran ancestry ripped from their souls for the dishonor, delusions, and misrepresentations they have blighted onto the name "Nordic."

I have a feeling the OP is trying to make some other sort of mysterious point that we cannot seem to fathom with the pure distractions of the polls themselves. Either that, or too much skooma.

No, warp is known to be bias, the poll being extremely bias isn't really surprising for him.

This^^.

Nothing to see here people, move along.

1st question: Pretty biased.

2nd question: Seems fine to me.

3rd: question: A valid question, given the WGC.

4th question: Biased forming, but valid question.

5th question: Very valid question, considering what happened in the Great War. Hammerfell was denounced as a province for not accepting their lands being given away, after all.

6th question: Interesting question, though I would say Imperial Law and not foreign law when I asked it.

7th and 8th question: I see nothing wrong with them.

9th question: Again, a valid question given the history of the Empire.

10th question: And I think this is a valid question as well. The Imperials are exporting their own culture, after all.

I think some people are overstating the bias in the poll. Most of the questions has a valid reason to be asked, especially the ones dealing with the Empire and how it has abandoned allies in the past to save itself. It may not be pretty, but it actually happened and people shouldn't dismiss it.

I'm supporting the Nords. The Empire abandoned Hammerfell and it's starting to come together and thrive now. TBH I think it was Empire's manipulation tactics to get the Crowns and Forebears to fight each other to maintain control of the province. The Nords are strong and independent with great tradition too, they deserve independence from a weak, cowardly and pathetic Empire.

The Redguards were fighting long before the Empire. The Empire just sided with the losing side, using the infighting to get control over the Redguards.

Redguards have been fighting each other since they took over Hammerfell.

I meant that they kept the infighting going to keep control. Divide and rule, an excellent tactic to control people in your Empire.

I don't think that's the case, forebears and crown have always been fighting and I doubt even the Empire at anytime could've stopped them.