gore and glitches or neither?

Post » Sat Dec 19, 2009 3:54 pm

keep in mind this comes from someone who doesn't think games should capitalise on gore, but we all know that New Vegas gets gruesome, and has more glitches then the amount of coke in charlie sheens nose. Now seeing as the gore is the least important part of the game, do you think Bethesda should take the time to look at and check the games coding instead of add in the dismemberment? Not all glitches are huge, but I have had moments where they've kept me from getting quests done and I'm sure I'm not the only one with that issue. Any thoughts on this?
User avatar
Daniel Holgate
 
Posts: 3538
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 1:02 am

Post » Sun Dec 20, 2009 1:13 am

They don't really need to add in dismemberment, it's built into the engine.
User avatar
IM NOT EASY
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:48 pm

Post » Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:06 pm

Lol nice reference to charie. But yah i think they should concentrate on making the glitches less.
User avatar
Michelle davies
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:59 am

Post » Sat Dec 19, 2009 7:20 pm

i highly doubt the addition of dismemberment is causing tech issues, in fact i'd say there is no chance that gore is causing quest bugs or freezing. i have a 44 magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world, it'll blow your head clean off.... and it does! and i like it. if you can't handle gore, don't buy M rated games.
User avatar
Jamie Lee
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 9:15 am

Post » Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:59 pm

I'm not saying I don't like the gore, it's just that it's the least important part of the game so the time adding it in could be used to check the coding
User avatar
Red Bevinz
 
Posts: 3318
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 7:25 am


Return to Fallout: New Vegas

cron