» Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:43 am
wow...didnt mean to offend anyone...seriously.
i like some of the older games with "crappy" graphics. if i still had the original zelda for the first nintendo system i would play it,because it was fun. wizardry games for the PC were also cool and had lousy graphics compared to games today. so,its not ALL about graphics,but i guess the way im looking at it is this: if im spending 60 or 70 bucks for a game that i can beat in a week or two,i better be dazzled by the graphics,music,and sound effects.
i can remember when a new game cost less than $20,and it was standard that a game came with the system inside the box. the companies are getting so stingy these days,im surprised they dont make you buy the wires separately. i paid almost $600 for the PS3. it didnt come with any games,only had one controller,basic hookup cables(not HDMI),and they still want me to shell out wads of cash for the games and other periphials. yes,the graphics had BETTER be good!