Thats only because most games are made for the Xbox then ported to the PS3. Which is why i still have an Xbox and still like it for allot games. But when battlefield 3 comes out allot developers will stop being lazy and have no excuse to be lazy as DICE have made a version for each platform, and the PS3 version looks and performs better actually using it in the way its ment to. Dont get me rong i love the Xbox, but when utalized the PS3 is a little better in everyway. After all it was made after the 360 and is more powerfull. Although the 36 has superior processing, when the PS3's GPU is used to aid its CPU the outcome is more performance utalizing the power. While most nearly all multiplatform games don't do this because they are made for the Xbox then utalized the best possible for the PS3.
Don't hold your breath for a superior Battlefield 3 on PS3... Crytek said the same about Crysis 2 on PS3 and look what happened. The PS3 version is regarded as the worst of the bunch. EA likes to sell BS PR when it comes to PS3 games.
I do agree that the PS3 is a powerful console, I just don't think it's necessarily more powerful than the Xbox 360. The Xbox is more balance with a good CPU, GPU, and RAM. While the PS3 has a excellent CPU and crap GPU/ RAM.
Let's be honest, all PS3 exclusive games are very good looking but restrictive gameplay wise. The bigger the levels the more the PS3 suffers...
Crytek said that they were having more performance out of the PS3 in early development. But Crysis 2 isn't made for each version individualy, it is one version and then it is adapted via the settings for each platform. Crytek being a PC company origionaly with this game isn't easily adapted for the PS3 as the 360 is closer to a PC's setup in terms of the hardware, so they made this game look the best it can on the 360 which is what was the easiest and compensated the PC version to not look as good as it could and the PS3 version to not look as good as it could.
Where as battlefield has been made in not one version, but 3 different versions, 1 for the Xbox to make it the best it can on that platform, 1 for the PS3 to make it the best it can on that platform, and 1 for the PC to make it the best it can be for that.
This is why i didnt get Crysis2 for the PC because its effectivly a console port and is nowhere near what it should be for the PC, but is also not what it should be for the PS3 as it was really made for the Xbox 360 like nearly all multi platofrm games as its alot easier. But i just couldn't handle the grain issue on the Xbox and actually like the draw distance and lighting once i got usedto the appearance of the PS3 version when my firend brought round the PS3 version which is why i traded it in for that one.
While with most gmaes these days the Xbox is running at or near 100% of its capacity, while the PS3 isn't. But DICE have made a version for the PS3 which uses it in the way it is ment and uses its power appropriatly and to an extent. Instead of using its power to cover up things that the result from the game not being fully PS3 friendly.
Battlefield 3 is looking good on the PS3 [my uncle accually had a private demo veiwing he works for gamespot] and is closer to the PC version. But there is not much difference the Xbox version is styill very good the PS3 version is just slightly more impressive in every aspect. It just means we will have more of a choice.
Nick...please stop wasting this thread space with your jarggin...if you have no issues with your ps3 version please just shut up and stay out...we are trying to deal with a specific issue here...stop throwing this thread off track...moron!