Some companies have no qualms with giving the PC a little extra love as the lead platform, DiCE and Bioware are two examples; The former going all the way with DirectX 11 and player numbers in multi-player, the latter making sure the UI is more mouse and shortcut-friendly. Others, however, like Crytek and Bethesda will moan about PC development being "too hard" and too prone to piracy (despite the Xbox 360 version of Skyrim being widely available and heavily downloaded 8 days before the PC version).

Some developers, unfortunately, are more than willing to play second fiddle to the customers who got them where they are in the pursuit of obscenely larger and larger profits. I am thoroughly enjoying Skyrim but I feel like they just weren't interested in my business unless I bought it for my Xbox 360, which I didn't. Maybe the fact that the PC version of this game is easily competing with both consoles in terms of sales will wake them up.

Do you think Bethesda spent five years trying to make the graphics in their game:

a. passable
b. impossible
c. the best they could across all three platforms.

Answer that and you answer your question.

^ Skyrim apparently uses very little disk space. Im some more can be fitted onto the disk. A few detail textures wouldnt exactly be lots on the 360. There is room for another gig if what i heard about 9 gigs being on a dual sided disk and 7.5 is usuable. (ps3 and pc obviously have no problems though, i dont see why Bethesda didn't simply put better textures in those versions)