My opinion of him just went up slightly.
And Uriel Septim spent years in Oblivion, and he came out of it in one piece, even if a bit upset.
I agree, I really liked that. I also know several people who likely clawed their eyes out.
Also, we don't know what part of Oblivion Sul was stuck in.
Problem is, if they made a MK-type novel, only the Lore Buffs would actually understand it. TES Lore has developed beyond what the average TES fan knows or understands. And they want to appeal to the masses.
I see a whole 'nother problem with a certain hilariously loud all-but-unpleasable minority chunk of the fanbase: let's say the novels use the lore, but mostly the political stuff, or at least the direct stuff (you know, the stuff characters that aren't Vivec know and talk about) then that certain group will scream that there isn't enough esoteric cryptospeak. Then if there was a ton of esoteric cryptospeak, CHIM-gibberish and Vivec crap, they'd say he was trying to invade MKs territory. Do the math, the only way to satisfy that particular group is to have MK write the book.
Not quite. The Tribunal exited before Morrowind in the PGE1. So, at the least, the Tribunal existed as of Redguard.
Whether you disagree with MK's work or not, you can't deny that his work is the apex of interest and debate. And interest and debate is the lifeblood of TES lore.
Point A: Yes. They were fleshed out in Morrowind, and then talked to death afterwards.
Point B: Used to be. Then there was that whole thing where suddenly word of god was the order of the day and so all the fun concepts to debate simply became multitudinous thread of "what's conxept X? Insert quoted MK post Y." Now it's just tedious and I'm waiting for new lore on Nords or soemthing else that hasn't been beaten to death.