NO hardcoe MODE CONFIRMED

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 9:35 am

What were they thinking? They were thinking they didn't want to waste time implementing game mechanics/features that very few would use.

Best leave such features to modders who can weave all that potential into something epic.

User avatar
Michelle Serenity Boss
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 10:49 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:41 pm

hardcoe mode would've undermined the dumbing down process.

User avatar
Horse gal smithe
 
Posts: 3302
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:23 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 2:16 pm

It does work that way. The very lowest percentage of people who beat the game on hardcoe mode was 18.6 %.

It was likely 2-3 times that many since consecutive playthroughs can get you different endings but do not count for multiple hardcoe finished.

This doesn't count people who didn't leave it on the entire time either.



There have been several videos that show food healing hp and thats it. There are plenty of videos being discussed that explain it.
User avatar
Eoh
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 6:03 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 2:43 pm

U guys realize the only think missing from NV hard-core is Food Water and Sleep needs.

Ohh sorry and kill-able companions.

User avatar
Dj Matty P
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 12:31 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:12 am

Thats what I think too - if there is already a hardcoe mode in the game, even if it is just as simple as the one of New Vegas, we will soon have modes that will improve this. Otherwise we will have to deal with buggy hardcoe mode mods for quite some time

User avatar
Ryan Lutz
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:39 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 8:00 pm

According to steam achievements about 1/20 players played a complete hardcoe playthrough, that does not include players who played it but at some point turned it off, maybe because they got stuck and didn't want to backtrack for food/water and "cheated" a little.

By comparison, few less people did the pickpocketing, or did the mini-game, or the ED-E upgrades. Playing hardcoe mode was a lot more popular than helping Caesar or the Caravan game.

Yet Bethesda made sure we'd have more mini-games to play. It's those little nuances that make a game great, so i don't follow your reasoning of "if only a few people enjoy something that's entirely optional, cut it", honestly i doubt that is the reasoning why Bethesda didn't go with a hardcoe-mode. If they thought it would fit well in the game, even if just 5% of the players will do a hardcoe complete playthrough, they would've done it.

User avatar
Jennifer May
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:51 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 7:26 am


Dont forget only 25% of players even beat the game. (Likely less due to multiple playthroughs)

That means at the very least 1/5 of the playthroughs were completed without ever turning hardcoe mode off.

Thats quite a few players.
User avatar
RUby DIaz
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:18 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 8:50 am

Because the people who didn't play enough to finish were clearly the super-dedicated types who'd be all over "sim" mode.

-----

Anyway, based on what we've seen people say in previous hardcoe threads, it seems like a good number of them thought "I played hardcoe, but then I moved on to mods that did it so much better!" Sooooooo.... you're going to mod it anyway. So why does it matter that they didn't put it in, when you're just going to replace it with Arwen's maschism (oh, I'm sorry.... "realism" :whistling: ) Tweaks & the like?

Better use of their dev time would've been working on mod support for the consoles, so everyone has access to that kind of thing.

User avatar
Jessica Lloyd
 
Posts: 3481
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 2:11 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 8:17 pm

Yup. Building it into Vanilla would've been nicer, but I'll settle for modding it in later.

User avatar
Lizs
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:45 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:52 am

Nah, if the script engine is related to Skyrim Papyrus, then any modder that did Needs for Skyrim, will likely create a "relative" bug free version for FO4. Technically it is not very difficult to do this. Basically just a magic effect with a 24 hour timestamp counter, and a value deducted from it over time(hunger, thirst, deprivation), and then a effect on food items that adds values to the counter(eat, drink, sleep). Making Stims heal over time is as easy as just modifying the Stim, though you could probably achieve that via script as well. What else was hardcoe part of NV?

User avatar
Pants
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:34 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:54 am

'hardcoe' mode was never about difficulty. It should have been called 'Realism' mode. I enjoyed having to actually think about what my character carried on her expeditions. Food and water may have been trivial, but they took up extra weight in your inventory along with ammo. It actually added a layer of realism. Fallout 4 is supposed to be an immersive experience. I don't find anything immersive about a character that can survive indefinitely without eating, drinking or sleeping.

What's even more frustrating is that it's a relatively simple thing to implement and it would be entirely optional. I'm not exactly an expert on scripting, but I'm pretty it goes something like this...

  • 3 global values for each 'need'.
  • A script increases these values every few minutes.
  • When a certain threshold is reached, a de-buff is added to your character.
  • Food and drink items have an extra effect that reduce these globals by a set amount when consumed.

I'll be sleeping, eating and drinking regularly with my character anyway. I just prefer it when the game itself recognizes my role play rather than having to impose it on myself.

User avatar
Johnny
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:32 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 12:37 pm

Has it been confirmed that ammunition or chems have weight?

User avatar
Lindsay Dunn
 
Posts: 3247
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:34 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 9:42 pm

They were thinking to speak to me in a normal tone of voice and not SCREAMING at the top of their lungs!

Also I don't see how the things listed are very "hardcoe".

User avatar
Greg Cavaliere
 
Posts: 3514
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 6:31 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:18 pm

no is the only part i still look for confirmation, but even so on NV, the only Ammo type that give me problems was Missiles, since u coundt Carrie that many, but everything else was just irrelevant again.

That why i really dont care Hard-core mode isnt there.

We got Survival level, Stinkpack is a HoT effect, more legendary enemies. Cool, even on hardcoe mode every time i lose a companion (that i only take it out just for their quest) i reload, new system prevent that and allow a more fluid game play.+

Food Water and Sleep was irrelevant from the star on Fallout NV bc u could drink from everywhere and food is easy to come back. So it was more like click something 1 time a day.

U want Hard-core mode, what we got on NV that isnt hard-core mode, go and play game like DragonSoul or DragonDogma, and u will see what is hard-core mode.

User avatar
Michael Korkia
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 7:58 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 1:29 pm

And the more Script intensive options will fry your Xbox One. or PS4

Can't say X b o n e on this Forum....

User avatar
Far'ed K.G.h.m
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:03 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 1:03 pm

I've got a funny feeling that the closer we get to release the more 48pt is going to be employed.

User avatar
Kieren Thomson
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 3:28 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 7:16 pm

Yep, and as we all know Bethesda's philosophy is to get rid of features instead of improve upon them. That would be too difficult.

User avatar
naana
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:00 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:09 am

si features need to be redo to fix it, and that take alot of time to actually give during development, plus is was a feature only add during NV that wasnt that popular to begins with.

User avatar
Marilú
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 7:17 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 8:17 am

If making a viable hardcoe mode was that easy, then all those modders who have spent as many years updating and tweaking their mod, as Bethesda has on the entire base game, wouldn't have such unbalanced and [censored] "hardcoe needs" mods.

Yet, they still manage to be ass.

User avatar
Ross Thomas
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 12:06 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 9:36 am

Bethesda has never included the feature in any of their games so there was never anything to "get rid of."

User avatar
benjamin corsini
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:32 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 9:42 pm

And of course every single eat/sleep/drink mod has allways been extremly script intensive :bonk:

User avatar
courtnay
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 8:49 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 9:03 am

That's not entirely true. 25% of the script content in RNAD deals with compatibility. Another 50% deals with features not directly related to needs (like vampire/werewolf compatibility, diseases and traps). A plain needs Mod utilizes a maximum of 10 scripts, which is far from being "intensive".

User avatar
sas
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 8:40 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 7:18 am

Sorry, should have put tag. My bad.

User avatar
Jonathan Braz
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 10:29 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 7:56 pm

so they didn't include something they didn't develop in the first place.... got it

User avatar
Kahli St Dennis
 
Posts: 3517
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:57 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:39 pm

I think how it's going to work is food and drink garner alternate effects to make up for Survival Necessity. Which I prefer.

User avatar
Robert Bindley
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 5:31 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout 4