Okay, I'm going to be as nice as possible with this one.
I've been playing the last two installments of Elder Scrolls (Oblivion and Morrowind) and call myself a fan of the series. Despite the world being completely open and rich with complexity, I've always appreciated the clean approach the game has to questing, battling and overall interaction with the world. A key ingredient here is to have a world that is believable, but to leave out elements that do not fair well in the trade off between realism and pragmatism. Take toilet breaks, regular sleep and eating for instance. None of those are relevant in the world of Elder Scrolls, and a character will happily quest for weeks on end without any food, sleep or relief. This however has never caused me to loose immersion in the game, nor do I hear much complaints about it from the community, showing that this was probably a well made decision regarding the practical flow of the game by dispensing with some basic human realism.
People did complain about this, moreso in Fallout. That's why Obsidian gave us hardcoe Mode, it makes you fight hunger, dehydration, and sleep deprivation. People liked it so much that a lot of people are asking for a hardcoe mode in Skyrim that has similar effects.
For many parts of the game, fans can probably bicker for days on end about whether the decision in this trade off was well made. Toilet breaks - few would care less, but the inclusion of children for instance has always been a staple issue for fans of the series. Their omission in earlier series has certainly reduced the realism of the world, thereby reducing immersion slightly, with the other end of the trade off being the practical gain that a children slaying option for a game is not very popular marketing wise. I, for one, am very happy that children will be included in the next iteration, making it that much easier to immerse in a world where a clear lack of children simply irks.
LOTS of people do NOT want children in Skyrim, mostly because we interacted with the good folks of Little Lamplight. Because we had to mod the game in order to, well, we're not allowed to discuss this, but THAT was a nasty immersion breaker. Having children in any video game makes every dope at Fox News and the PTA to go "ZOMG FOAR TEH CHILDRUN!" and something had to be done to shut the media up. It pissed me off, it pissed off a LOT of other people, and we have all excepted the fact that you can't have children in this game without somebody making a big deal about it, so we've all decided that it is more prudent to stop asking Bethesda to give themselves a media fiasco.
This brings me to a different 'lack' in the world of The Elder Scrolls, and I shall be brief here. Despite romance not being at all relevant so far in the series, there is a clear inclusion of it as far as couples, families and general conversations go while enjoying the game world. Inn-keepers do have spouses and scoundrels do allude to the fairer six. Albeit another detail, it irks me again that there is little to no inclusion of any LGBT material in Tamriel, to the same extent as childless villages. Homosixuality is a fact of life in our reality, and seeing as how 95% of the behaviour of our human species has made it into the game, it is unlikely that there is not a single gay, lisbian, transgendered or bisixual person in the whole of Tamriel. Not even amongst the elfs (which, despite being a tired cliche, does make even more sense with their relative wisdom, age and openness). It does not require any active plot or main character to restore this balance, but there is no practical argument against the inclusion of LGBT NPCs, and yet a considerable amount of increased realism to gain. An inn-keep and her wife or a legend about two valiant princes would do.
You may have a point, but when it comes development time, they need to prioritize what gets done. If it's between having a few gay couples in the game or having a big fight scene involving you shooting a harpoon through the midsection of a dragon, I'd prefer them to work on including the latter. You DO have to face facts that TES has used minimal homosixual materials in the game, so if it does slip their minds, then they will get so far along into the production of Skyrim that they are beta testing and getting a live build ready to hit the shelves and are done with production. There may be little arguing about whether it's practical for gay material to be included in Skyrim for the sake for immersion, but there IS a whole argument to whether it would be practical to devote a few weeks to building it into the game especially when they are working all the bugs out at this time.
Also, I may be wrong here, but I thought the guy that gives you the House Halauu (or however you spell it) quests was openly bisixual.
Other popular rpgs (eg. Mass Effect, Dragon Age) have included LGBT realism in their game worlds (despite being heavy on some nasty tired tropes in that regard), so I cannot see why Skyrim should not at least count a few sturdy Nord battle-partners, or perhaps even a lovely dragon couple of similar gender. It should not bother anyone (if it does, the rock you live under should bother you more) and there are at least some people out there who would benefit from this addition when immersing themselves in the next Elder Scrolls game.
Three things to remember here. First, this isn't Mass Effect or Dragon Age and Bethesda doesn't need to give a damn about how Bioware makes games. If they want to, the TES team could put in a violent crackdown and persecution of homosixuality. That was also part of our society and history. Second, dragons? It just seems like that would be a wtf moment for me there, especially if what some people were saying about the dragons, one at a time would be a tough fight, so having partner dragons would be kind of tough to put in with it appealing to you and still keeping the game balanced and smooth. Lastly, if you want to get your point across without either being a [censored] or shutting a bunch of people out, then don't make an attack as you did. If you think somebody is ignorant because they have something wrong with homosixuality, then for the love of god DO NOT tell them they are living under a rock. Respect that a Christian (even Jewish or Islamic) upbringing usually leaves the person with, at the very least, an uncomfortable feeling because all their life, they were told that being gay sent you to hell. If you do, there is a MUCH higher chance that you can build a bridge instead of a wall, and if you don't, then there is a good chance that they will tune you out and put you on their ignore list. The opposition may seem like a crowd of morons half the time on any issue, but they really are just people with different beliefs and they have feelings just like you.
PS. If you can't just play the game because the lack of homosixual content, go pickup New Vegas and select the appropriate perk.