It was in one of the GI interviews, maybe the podcast, I can't remember, But they don't want swag horses that don't live up to the likes seen in RDR, as I imagine they won't live up to the rest of Skyrim. It's all or nothing for them on horses, which is fine by me.
WHY do people make this crap up? Ihear this exact statement all the time here. They NEVER said that.
What they said was
"Something we’re messing with, and we don’t know where it’s going to end up. There were things with the Oblivion horses. We liked having them. They weren’t the greatest implementation of horses. And now you see things come out like Red Dead. There are more horses in games, and we feel like just the basic implementation we did in Oblivion isn’t going to be good enough. We are currently attempting things with that, and I don’t know where it’s going to end up.”
To summarise
-We don't know yet
-Red Dead Redemption has good horses
-More horses in games these days
-
Oblivion wasn't good enough implementation for Skyrim (as opposed to
every single game except RDR)
So yeah, the absolutist approach people are assuming they are going with is utter crap.