How could FONV have been more real ?

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 6:13 pm

To rebuild a society, you need a working beginnings of one. Look how NCR fares, the Legion, the Strip with Mr. House. There you have some early societies that all are striving towards some form of rebuilding. And you gotta remember the situation the region is in, and that building a nation doesn't happen in one night, and without a (forced or voluntary) unity of the people in it.

Yah but how long have they all been there?? For a little while now not to mention mr. house. I think some rebuilding could happen...
User avatar
Doniesha World
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:12 pm

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 12:31 pm

Yah but how long have they all been there?? For a little while now not to mention mr. house. I think some rebuilding could happen...


And some has happened. Look at the Strip, for example. The outskirts of Vegas, there are working farmlands with irrigation and even greenhouses built. There is electricity. Goodsprings fares well by itself, with a watersource and farming. Nipton was a working little community. etc
User avatar
Penny Wills
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:16 pm

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 7:24 pm

I have to agree with this. Why do almost everybody live in tents and run downed buildings? because there not rebuilding. If they were that wall along the strip should have been rebuilt because it looks like sh*t. Not to mention that in most towns they dont even help to rebuild some of the buildings or make them more attractive.


The NCR and Legion use tents because their armies are on their way through the area. I think carrying around a brick house and several concrete bunkers would be somewhat cumbersome. Not to say, constructing them would take time, resources, a proper foundation, etc. A tent can be made from cotton.
User avatar
Jamie Moysey
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 6:31 am

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:27 pm

And some has happened. Look at the Strip, for example. The outskirts of Vegas, there are working farmlands with irrigation and even greenhouses built. There is electricity. Goodsprings fares well by itself, with a watersource and farming. Nipton was a working little community. etc

Yah but overall thats the EASY rebuilding. im talking about some hard work. Rebuidling the tows to what the once were.
User avatar
SexyPimpAss
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:24 am

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 6:55 pm

Yah but overall thats the EASY rebuilding. im talking about some hard work. Rebuidling the tows to what the once were.


For that you can blame the crammed and greatly downscaled sandbox map, the engine and the given developement time. Nor would I think, they would've made it much bigger anyways. It's more of an abstraction than 1:1 depiction (1:1 would've been nigh impossible to create anyway).
User avatar
Mark Churchman
 
Posts: 3363
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 5:58 am

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 6:18 am

For that you can blame the crammed and greatly downscaled sandbox map, the engine and the given developement time. Nor would I think, they would've made it much bigger anyways. It's more of an abstraction than 1:1 depiction (1:1 would've been nigh impossible to create anyway).

Yah what are you talking about?
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:58 pm

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 12:33 pm

Yah what are you talking about?


You wanted towns as they once were. I pointed out that giving those with current tools was not possible.
User avatar
Reven Lord
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:56 pm

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:13 pm

You wanted towns as they once were. I pointed out that giving those with current tools was not possible.

Yah and wasnt that easy to put it into simpler words?
User avatar
sally R
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:34 pm

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 12:50 pm

Yah and wasnt that easy to put it into simpler words?


:rolleyes: It was, actually. I'll keep in mind to keep it simple when replying to you.
User avatar
Heather beauchamp
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 6:05 pm

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 6:20 pm

:rolleyes: It was, actually. I'll keep in mind to keep it simple when replying to you.

Are you insulting my intelligence?
User avatar
Melanie Steinberg
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:25 pm

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:36 pm

Are you insulting my intelligence?


No.
User avatar
mishionary
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:19 am

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:31 pm

No.

Ok i was just wondering.
User avatar
Eliza Potter
 
Posts: 3481
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:20 am

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 4:41 pm

Yah but overall thats the EASY rebuilding. im talking about some hard work. Rebuidling the tows to what the once were.

i agree epic, i've heard a lot of talk about how civilized new vegas is and all this rebuilbing going on, they can't have it both ways, they just can't explain why the map is 99% barren empty desert, if it was really rebuilding, there would be settllents all over the place, and not just in the city, and to another comment on here, i am hardly the only person who thinks new vegas is on the boring side after a short time of playing it, the polls here on the threads show 60% bored with the game, the game's life is really short, it was a good game but its beyond boring to never have other enemies spawn in an area or not having any random events or encounters at all, no factions anywhere, a huge desert with nothing but a lot of tents and shacks and the same static spawns etc, its gamebreaking.
User avatar
Scotties Hottie
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:40 am

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:17 pm

i agree epic, i've heard a lot of talk about how civilized new vegas is and all this rebuilbing going on, they can't have it both ways, they just can't explain why the map is 99% barren empty desert, if it was really rebuilding, there would be settllents all over the place, and not just in the city, and to another comment on here, i am hardly the only person who thinks new vegas is on the boring side after a short time of playing it, the polls here on the threads show 60% bored with the game, the game's life is really short, it was a good game but its beyond boring to never have other enemies spawn in an area or not having any random events or encounters at all, no factions anywhere, a huge desert with nothing but a lot of tents and shacks and the same static spawns, its gamebreaking.


Please, for the love of God, we get your point, its an OPINION, and besides, most said that they were not bored with the game.

New Vegas itself is not that rebuilt just yet, as the NCR has not gotten there yet. IF you go into NCR itself, the country has amazing infrastructure and security. Its almost like living in a pre-war world.

And plus, New Vegas is set in Vegas, and the region sourrounding it. If you look at a map, that area is not that big in real life, so settlements are few and far between and also, the NCR is rebuilt, and towns are days, if not weeks away from each other.
User avatar
Tom
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 7:39 pm

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 11:54 am

i agree epic, i've heard a lot of talk about how civilized new vegas is and all this rebuilbing going on, they can't have it both ways, they just can't explain why the map is 99% barren empty desert, if it was really rebuilding, there would be settllents all over the place, and not just in the city, and to another comment on here, i am hardly the only person who thinks new vegas is on the boring side after a short time of playing it, the polls here on the threads show 60% bored with the game, the game's life is really short, it was a good game but its beyond boring to never have other enemies spawn in an area or not having any random events or encounters at all, no factions anywhere, a huge desert with nothing but a lot of tents and shacks and the same static spawns etc, its gamebreaking.

This. I can agree with most of this.
User avatar
Carys
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:15 pm

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 4:26 pm

Yah but overall thats the EASY rebuilding. im talking about some hard work. Rebuidling the tows to what the once were.
i agree epic
:celebration: putting up a few greenhouses and growing a few vegetables isn't much rebuilding, and as far as electricity, there was electricity in FO3 too, rivet city, megaton, tenpenny tower, enclave base, citadel etc, and the new vegas strip doesn't look all that great, its lit up, that sign guy got the signs working evidentaly but freeside looks like hell and so do all the other places in and around the city...out in the"wasteland" there isn't any rebuilding, no new towns, settlements, no groups actually out and about rebuilding anything, they never leave home, seriously, i think obsidian didn't have time to really make the open gameworld a real sandbox game, they made all the caves small, put up tents and one room shacks cause they don't require hardly any time and used the excuse that, "oh we want everything to be plausible" thats just code language for they didn't have the time to really fill the map up with legitimate areas and actually taking the time to build more settlements, if you're gonna talk about rebuilt civilizations etc and then leave the almost the entire map totally empty, its just a big contradiction, you can't have it both ways.
User avatar
Emily Jones
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 3:33 pm

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 1:46 pm

i agree epic, i've heard a lot of talk about how civilized new vegas is and all this rebuilbing going on, they can't have it both ways, they just can't explain why the map is 99% barren empty desert, if it was really rebuilding, there would be settllents all over the place, and not just in the city


Because it's the Mojave [censored] wasteland. You're not really that shortsighted, that you cannot understand the concept of a wasteland and basic human behavior of gathering together and forming societies, are you? I've seen you post sensible things too. Where are those things now?
User avatar
Pat RiMsey
 
Posts: 3306
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 1:22 am

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 1:48 pm

And its yet another paragraph from Westoftherockies saying how New Vegas is empty and theres nothing but shacks and tents. I think we're on number #371 by now.
User avatar
Sherry Speakman
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:00 pm

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 6:06 pm

Please, for the love of God, we get your point, its an OPINION, and besides, most said that they were not bored with the game.

New Vegas itself is not that rebuilt just yet, as the NCR has not gotten there yet. IF you go into NCR itself, the country has amazing infrastructure and security. Its almost like living in a pre-war world.

And plus, New Vegas is set in Vegas, and the region sourrounding it. If you look at a map, that area is not that big in real life, so settlements are few and far between and also, the NCR is rebuilt, and towns are days, if not weeks away from each other.

User avatar
Michael Korkia
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 7:58 pm

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 7:54 pm

i agree epic
:celebration: putting up a few greenhouses and growing a few vegetables isn't much rebuilding, and as far as electricity, there was electricity in FO3 too, rivet city, megaton, tenpenny tower, enclave base, citadel etc, and the new vegas strip doesn't look all that great, its lit up, that sign guy got the signs working evidentaly but freeside looks like hell and so do all the other places in and around the city...out in the"wasteland" there isn't any rebuilding, no new towns, settlements, no groups actually out and about rebuilding anything, they never leave home, seriously, i think obsidian didn't have time to really make the open gameworld a real sandbox game, they made all the caves small, put up tents and one room shacks cause they don't require hardly any time and used the excuse that, "oh we want everything to be plausible" thats just code language for they didn't have the time to really fill the map up with legitimate areas and actually taking the time to build more settlements, if you're gonna talk about rebuilt civilizations etc and then leave the almost the entire map totally empty, its just a big contradiction, you can't have it both ways.

Yah. Freeside looks like sh*t. But nobobys going to rebuild it. Because the real attraction is the strip. Its pretty sad that, thats the only real interesting thing there in NV. That is actually Awwww inspiring.
User avatar
Pumpkin
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 10:23 am

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:44 pm

i agree epic
:celebration: putting up a few greenhouses and growing a few vegetables isn't much rebuilding, and as far as electricity, there was electricity in FO3 too, rivet city, megaton, tenpenny tower, enclave base, citadel etc, and the new vegas strip doesn't look all that great, its lit up, that sign guy got the signs working evidentaly but freeside looks like hell and so do all the other places in and around the city...out in the"wasteland" there isn't any rebuilding, no new towns, settlements, no groups actually out and about rebuilding anything, they never leave home, seriously, i think obsidian didn't have time to really make the open gameworld a real sandbox game, they made all the caves small, put up tents and one room shacks cause they don't require hardly any time and used the excuse that, "oh we want everything to be plausible" thats just code language for they didn't have the time to really fill the map up with legitimate areas and actually taking the time to build more settlements, if you're gonna talk about rebuilt civilizations etc and then leave the almost the entire map totally empty, its just a big contradiction, you can't have it both ways.

Rebuilt civilization doesnt mean flooding the map to look like D.C. and cramped with lots of city. Vegas is pretty accurately portrayed, a beacon of light in a desert of nothing. Also, that 'if you're gonna talk about rebuilt civilizations etc and then leave the almost the entire map totally empty' claim is so ridiculous and you know it. How so? Because Vegas, Goodsprings, NoVac, Primm, and all those other settlements, they are easier to rebuild because they are there. Rebuilding civilization DOESNT mean expanding into new lands, that's the sign of a burgeoning community needing more space, but those settlements were already there, why build filthy shacks made of scrap metal when you can restore a Four Seasons hotel to working order? Well, thats what they are doing. Reviving the old world. Just because F:NV isn't some mindless dungeon crawler doesn't make it a bad game. New Vegas has a great story, and it presents a very good model of a rebuilding community, just because you're refusing to take the time to observe everything you see in the game doesn't put the game at fault, it puts you at fault.
User avatar
Vickey Martinez
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:58 am

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 1:53 pm

Im wondering why you qouted yourself. Alex.
User avatar
Crystal Clear
 
Posts: 3552
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:42 am

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:31 pm

West, this is the core region, which most of it is well rebuilt, cities are weeks away from each other.
http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080606162927/fallout/images/2/29/Western_USA_v1.0.jpg
User avatar
Tanya Parra
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 5:15 am

Post » Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:54 am

Im wondering why you qouted yourself. Alex.

easier than saying the same thing twice in a different way.
User avatar
D IV
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 1:32 am

Post » Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:55 pm

http://images.wikia.com/fallout/images/d/d3/Fo2_New_California_Republic_Satellite_View.jpg

There's the NCR as it appears in Fallout 2.
User avatar
jessica breen
 
Posts: 3524
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 1:04 am

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout: New Vegas