1. It's not "nerfing yourself". You're specifically choosing to break the game for yourself
2. And then you come in here and whine about it like you're imparting some grand wisdom to the rest of us.
3. You're just making yourself look stupid... repeatedly.
1. It's nerfing myself because I can't play the game the way I wish to play it without breaking it's balance.
When the game gives me something then I expect to be able to use it without the difficulty level land-sliding down to lolcat level.
So I ask for game balance, "But you don't have to use it" no, I don't, but why shouldn't I?
Why should I "have to" avoid that thing just cause the developers couldn't balance it properly?
"It's far out of the way", yes, it is, it is far out of the way, but even so, why should I "not" return there?
I bought Dead Money, why should I not be able to enjoy it's content without having to worry about game being too easy?
I consider it nerfing myself, having to avoid a feature, even if it's far away, just cause it's unbalanced.
Like in FO3, we weren't "forced" to play with a 10 END character, so we had the "choice" to limit ourselves to 1 END in order to have "some" resemblance of balance.
And that was self nerfing.
Now, the vendor isn't a permanent thing on the player character and it's secluded to it's own area, but the fact still arises that I have to choose to not use the feature cause it breaks balance, just like I had to choose 1 END in FO3 in order to have balance.
I made a choice with 1 END, that was self nerfing, I make the choice with not using the vendor for the same reason.
How is that not self-nerfing then?
2. Not really, just asking for a patch.
3. Okay.
I'm done with this trolling BS. Waste of my time.
Trolling?