how much for a desktop to run ESO on ultra?

Post » Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:26 pm

I knew it would be these three bozos jumping down my throat before even checking my email.

User avatar
Alan Cutler
 
Posts: 3163
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 9:59 am

Post » Fri Mar 28, 2014 8:26 am

not all i7's have 8 cores. majority are 4 core

User avatar
Mrs shelly Sugarplum
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:16 am

Post » Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:09 pm

you being CPU illiterate and posting completely false information on a forum makes us bozos? okay, that's a new one.

User avatar
Nichola Haynes
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 4:54 pm

Post » Fri Mar 28, 2014 1:52 am

If you could expand the budget to $700 so you could cover tax, shipping, misc parts you might need, its doable. $600 is pushing it, and even worse if you need an OS.

There have been dozens and dozens of threads recently about budget builds. Use the forum search function.

Edit; an unlocked i5 is very good for gaming. I run my 2500k at 4.5ghz with a Gigabyte 670 at 1200mhz max clock and im almost always pulling 95+ fps.

User avatar
kirsty joanne hines
 
Posts: 3361
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:06 am

Post » Fri Mar 28, 2014 1:36 pm

this threads got silly...i'm out.

User avatar
Jade
 
Posts: 3520
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:42 am

Post » Fri Mar 28, 2014 1:59 pm

Games today rely more on graphics power to look pretty than the CPU. An I5, Ivy Bridge, is more than enough processing power to run it on ultra with 2000+ players on screen. I use an I5, 4670K with a GTX 770 EVGA Superclocked video card and I run everything on ultra no lag, no problem.

User avatar
Wayne Cole
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:22 am

Post » Fri Mar 28, 2014 7:42 am

It's too late to deal with your ad hominem, especially after seeing how you feel the need to vituperate anyone who asks about computers you believe to be 'inferior'. We can compare our qualifications for computing knowledge elsewhere.

Not all i7's would be underutilized, and there is no reason to deny yourself additional expand-ability.

User avatar
TASTY TRACY
 
Posts: 3282
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 7:11 pm

Post » Fri Mar 28, 2014 9:27 am

the OP is obviously on a budget, and wants the best bang for his buck. He's talking about ESO on ultra, and an i7 is simply a waste of money, no butts about it. if he wants to future proof, sure, get an i7, but that's not what he asked.

/thread

User avatar
Baby K(:
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 9:07 pm

Post » Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:52 pm

Built my PC for $1000 ~ 2 years ago and it ran ESO on ultra no problems. i5-2400, 8GB RAM, Radeon HD 6800. The game has been designed to be pretty spec friendly from what I recall.

User avatar
Angela Woods
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:15 pm

Post » Thu Mar 27, 2014 11:55 pm

I've got a similar question.

I'd like to run max video settings with 2560x1440 resolution and minimum 60 fps at all times. Any clues on a video card?

Thanks!

User avatar
Lil Miss
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 12:57 pm

Post » Fri Mar 28, 2014 11:54 am

GTX Titan hehehe

User avatar
Naughty not Nice
 
Posts: 3527
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 6:14 am

Post » Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:09 pm

You would probably have to go as high as gtx 780/ r9 290, But you would still not get constant 60 fps in cyrodiil, at least judging on beta experience.

User avatar
David Chambers
 
Posts: 3333
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 4:30 am

Post » Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:09 pm

I've had Titan, and you'd be surprised how many games failed. Not because the card is bad, but because of poor 3d game engines. Gw2, World of Tanks, Battlefield 4, etc.

User avatar
CSar L
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 9:36 pm

Post » Fri Mar 28, 2014 1:24 am

Depends but for 450-700 you will get one that can do it.

User avatar
Christina Trayler
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 3:27 am

Post » Fri Mar 28, 2014 3:16 am

Antialiasing was not functioning in the beta runs. Therefore, running on ultra during beta may not be the same as running ultra after release when those things are working properly. I have no worries about my system, but anything less than 1000, is going to be extremely iffy. CPU will play a big part in PVP and in crowded areas, so keep that in mind also.

Hopefully true full screen comes out at release, and SLI shortly thereafter. I would be very happy :P

User avatar
Strawberry
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 11:08 am

Post » Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:07 pm

If you have basic hardwares, like mouse, keyboard, monitor, i would say you will need at least 800+ to upgrade. Depending on what hardwares and where you buying it from.

User avatar
Steve Fallon
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 12:29 am

Post » Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:27 pm

It really depends on what resolution you're running at. 1080p? You can build a rig for ESO on ultra @35-55fps for right around $800-850 if you already have mouse, KB, speakers etc... Running at higher resolutions or requiring nothing less than 60fps constant will put the GPU requirements a bit higher though. Expect to head into $1000 territory.
User avatar
KiiSsez jdgaf Benzler
 
Posts: 3546
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:10 am

Post » Fri Mar 28, 2014 4:08 am

Don't need an SSD for this game. Improves the boot time of your comp from powered down to loaded into your desktop. But, most of the loading is going to take please between you and ZOS servers. Though an SSD might lower your time in load screens by like 5 secs lol. Not worth it at the current pricing of SSD's.

Also, the cards you listed as being able to run this game on Ultra probably wouldn't at all, at a playable level(30fps + ). As stated, this game isn't fullscreen yet, or at least wasn't during any part of any beta. That means that things like AA and anisotropic filtering didn't have any affect on the game, even if turned on. I wouldn't buy a graphics card that wasn't at least a GTX 600 series or better for Nvidia, or an AMD HD 7700 series or better for AMD.

User avatar
KiiSsez jdgaf Benzler
 
Posts: 3546
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:10 am

Post » Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:15 pm

A lot of folks are forgetting the mandatory $100 for the Operating System...

For a computer to run on Ultra, not including monitor, keyboard, mouse... you are looking at around $1000-1300...

You can get by with an i5 (I have a different viewpoint between the i7/i5 debate but this will be more than fine) and 6-8 GB of RAM.

But you never skimp on your motherboard or case... ever. These need to be quality. They do not need to be the "overclocker special" and dont even need to have two connection ports for video cards... but they need to be quality mobos.

Your PSU is gonna have to be 500w minimum.

And the hard drive... well hard drives do not have much to do with playing a MMO. Just dont get a junker... pretty much anything western digital should be fine that is at least a 7200 rpm HDD.

Video card can be a 650 ti for like $130.

User avatar
Maddy Paul
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:20 pm

Post » Fri Mar 28, 2014 1:37 am

700-800 dollars in my opinion

User avatar
Campbell
 
Posts: 3262
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:54 am

Post » Fri Mar 28, 2014 7:08 am

According to my task manager etc ESO only uses one core.

SSD may not seem necessary but the huge amount of streaming content and cache size would make it a worthy investment.

You will have the same problem with the gtx690 or any sli settup. No engine on the market has cracked the arbitrary assignment problem so everything runs better on a single gpu. Spend your money here and on ram.

@Wilem82 I spent a year not being able to play bf4 because the 690 uses both gpus for physics processing which frostbyte 3 doesnt support. It would result in a hard reboot of my pc, disabling any sli or multi gpu function caused the game to run smoothly. I found the same thing with ESO that sli would produce worse performance then setting physics to one gpu and turningoff sli on the other.

With an i7 32 gb ram gtx690 I can run on ultra with 100 render range without a hickup and at a capped 60 fps (for recording). I also spent about $2000 at the time I built this pc.

User avatar
Sxc-Mary
 
Posts: 3536
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 12:53 pm

Post » Fri Mar 28, 2014 1:07 am

I believe you meant a GTX X60 serIes or better. The first number of the GTX line has no bearing on its performance. (I.e. a 590 would blow a 640 out of the water)
User avatar
N3T4
 
Posts: 3428
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:36 pm

Post » Thu Mar 27, 2014 11:31 pm

I tested both 560ti and 6870 during beta both did 60+ fps they were both capable of ultra and perform very similar in 3d mark with a score of ~ 3300

Never cheap out on your PSU there are cheaper out there yes but they use [censored] parts and the voltage can vary ie. Go up and down. PSU is the heart of computer make sure you have a decent on for a dedicated gfx card.
User avatar
Mrs shelly Sugarplum
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:16 am

Post » Fri Mar 28, 2014 5:07 am

Then you need to change it manually to 4, because that's what eso utilizes at best.

However, Judging by the rest of your post, I'd say that you misread your task manager.

User avatar
Esther Fernandez
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 11:52 am

Post » Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:32 am

Given that the graphics options(AA and anisotropic filtering) didn't have any bearing on the game yet, since it wasn't true fullscreen, only borderless fullscreen, any testing with those cards during beta won't represent what the game will run like when the true fullscreen is implemented.

User avatar
Logan Greenwood
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 5:41 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games