It was bothering me a bit that I kept finding power armor and Fusion Cores thrown around like they were going out of style but none of the cars or appliances worked. I think I've found an acceptable explanation- one that I can live with:
INDUSTRIAL VS. MIL-SPEC DESIGN
Power armor was cutting-edge tech before the apocalypse and was designed to be durable and functional for a very long time under diverse conditions. They were built to last. Automobiles and appliances, consumer goods, were designed with a short, finite functional lifespan and made of cheap materials. We get pretty clear indications that the consumer culture before the war was built on cashing in for businesses, and on feathering the nest for the consumers.
DISTRIBUTION OF POWER ARMOR IN THE COMMONWEALTH
We are informed by the intro that the military was being heavily deployed in the Massachusetts as the bombs began to drop. We also see lots and lots of evidence about this wandering the wastes. Dead soldiers, tanks, gear, etc., are pretty much everywhere. So the suits were all over the place because this was an active, heavy deployment.
DUAL USE OF POWER CORES
The presence of relatively plentiful supplies of power cores is supported by the dual-use nature of that power source. They could be used for military equipment or civilian and as such they can be found in old industrial facilities as well as in military bases and such.
HOW THIS ALL FITS INTO CANON
I don't see any of this stuff as contradicting canon, more like elaborating upon it. The setting of the Commonwealth and the story are fleshing out more of the very end of the prewar world than previous games. Why were most of the new mechanisms and gear and tech in FO4 NOT present, from a lore perspective in previous games? To be honest I don't think the answer to that is hugely important, at least for me- I'm willing to suspend my disbelief and interest in canon if it means a better game, which I feel FO4 definitely is. But to hazard an attempt at answering that, maybe it's a regional thing. Like how today large parts of first world countries still don't have broadband internet, for example. Maybe this new tech was just first seen in areas like the commonwealth and still hadn't spread across the country.
What say you all?