How well did FNV sell?

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 3:17 am

powder gangers, giant ants and geckos, all those enemies are so weak once you're leveled up a bit, you never even have to stop for those things, that entire left side of the map that goodsprings is on doesn't have any real threats unless you go out of your way, like near the giant scorpions or the few reavers near that radiated shack, that left side of the map isn't all that dangerous, powder gangers are level 1 enemies that never get any tougher, i have only even seen ceasers legion on the left side of the map twice in the two months i played new vegas.


I still have trouble at lvl 30 with 100 Energy Weapons against Deathclaws and Super Mutants. The only way I killed the Legendary Deathclaw was because it got stuck in a rock.
User avatar
Jason King
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 2:05 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 1:16 pm

Is better than enemies every 3 minutes in your butts
User avatar
Eduardo Rosas
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 3:15 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 10:35 am

Please excuse the the old Christmas avatar, i haven't been here for a while.

The last i thing heard in relation to FNVs sales figures were the pretty impressive pre-order sales back in 2010. I was just wondering if anyone knew how well FNV has done since then. I tried searching but no luck.

It's just a personal thing with me, knowing that FNV sold better than FO3 isn't JUST about hate for FO3, it would be a sign that there is a big market not just for open world games, but INTELLIGENT open world games.


I believe the real question is that now all of NV's has went down how many people returned thier copy.

Four or Five of my friends and I returned NV already (Out of eight... I convinced all of them to get F3 and we helped eachother out with stuf, told eachother how to get to cool loot etc.) and I doubt that we're alone on it. I believ reading somewhere that the number of people who returned Vegas was well over 5% of the copies sold (somewhat unaccurate figures).

I will never play Newq Vegas again, yet I'm still playing F3.
User avatar
sam smith
 
Posts: 3386
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:55 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 12:58 am

Is better than enemies every 3 minutes in your butts


It's weird; I remember when F3 came out that a lot of people complained it was underpopulated. I messed around with it a few weeks ago and still had long periods of empty wasteland. I think people tend to exaggerate the frequency of encounters in F3.

Dario, if you weren't referring to F3, my apologies. In the general context of the thread I assumed you were.
User avatar
GPMG
 
Posts: 3507
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:55 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 3:09 pm

I believe the real question is that now all of NV's has went down how many people returned thier copy.

Four or Five of my friends and I returned NV already (Out of eight... I convinced all of them to get F3 and we helped eachother out with stuf, told eachother how to get to cool loot etc.) and I doubt that we're alone on it. I believ reading somewhere that the number of people who returned Vegas was well over 5% of the copies sold (somewhat unaccurate figures).

I will never play Newq Vegas again, yet I'm still playing F3.


And you don't think a bunch of people returned their copies of F3?
User avatar
Jessica Lloyd
 
Posts: 3481
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 2:11 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 8:52 am

And you don't think a bunch of people returned their copies of F3?

no, there was no reason to return a fun game
User avatar
Paula Rose
 
Posts: 3305
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:12 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 12:49 pm

But what about all the people who did return Fallout 3?
User avatar
Kevin S
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 12:50 pm

Post » Mon May 16, 2011 11:26 pm

(I got a wonderful idea, how about we quit arguing about what game sold better, who took what game back, and just get this thread locked, it's causing nothing but trouble anyway.)
User avatar
Rich O'Brien
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 3:53 am

Post » Mon May 16, 2011 11:25 pm

(I got a wonderful idea, how about we quit arguing about what game sold better, who took what game back, and just get this thread locked, it's causing nothing but trouble anyway.)


Fantastic idea.
User avatar
asako
 
Posts: 3296
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:16 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 1:51 am

no, there was no reason to return a fun game


You thought it was fun, but not everyone did. There's always someone out there who gets bored with x game and takes it to their local Gamestop.
User avatar
Shirley BEltran
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:14 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 4:07 am

You thought it was fun, but not everyone did. There's always someone out there who gets bored with x game and takes it to their local Gamestop.

Or give it to the less fortunate :)
User avatar
Queen Bitch
 
Posts: 3312
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 2:43 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 11:57 am

Yeah, let the Mods lock this thread

bah get off your high horse haha, you were one of the ones arguing :P

also yea i'll admit there is more freedom in new vegas, but not THAT much more.
User avatar
Dominic Vaughan
 
Posts: 3531
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 1:47 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 6:05 am

I still have trouble at lvl 30 with 100 Energy Weapons against Deathclaws and Super Mutants. The only way I killed the Legendary Deathclaw was because it got stuck in a rock.

once i'm level 20 i have all the good weapons and enough good perks to deal with even the toughest enemies, the deathclaws are only in certain areas and once you know exactly how to stay of reach its just a matter of taking em out from far away and usually on a rock or piece of equipment, like in the quarry, for closeup, use the multiplas rifle with some psycho, but from farther away, i just use the hunting rifle, or sniper rifle or gauss rifle, one of those 3 usually from distances, deathclaws you don't want suprising you or else its not good. you need tons of meds lol.
User avatar
TWITTER.COM
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 3:15 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 8:54 am

I believe the real question is that now all of NV's has went down how many people returned thier copy.

Four or Five of my friends and I returned NV already (Out of eight... I convinced all of them to get F3 and we helped eachother out with stuf, told eachother how to get to cool loot etc.) and I doubt that we're alone on it. I believ reading somewhere that the number of people who returned Vegas was well over 5% of the copies sold (somewhat unaccurate figures).

I will never play Newq Vegas again, yet I'm still playing F3.

for me the lack of content and just super static gameworld is gamebreaking, new vegas was ok for a month or two but its just so predictable every time, and the desert is super empty it doesn't have nearly enough decent locations, you're out in the open wherver you are, very little cover anywhere, it needed like 3 times more stuff on the map, more towns, more buildings, better terrain, on the entire bottom half of the map especially instead of those huge barren dry lakes, all that space wasted, its just so empty there is no reason to travel around the map. so i'm done with the game, their dlc sales aren't gonna be all that great.
User avatar
Angel Torres
 
Posts: 3553
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:08 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 1:09 am

once i'm level 20 i have all the good weapons and enough good perks to deal with even the toughest enemies, the deathclaws are only in certain areas and once you know exactly how to stay of reach its just a matter of taking em out from far away and usually on a rock or piece of equipment, like in the quarry, for closeup, use the multiplas rifle with some psycho, but from farther away, i just use the hunting rifle, or sniper rifle or gauss rifle, one of those 3 usually from distances, deathclaws you don't want suprising you or else its not good. you need tons of meds lol.

You know, that could go for Fallout 3 aswell.
User avatar
sophie
 
Posts: 3482
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:31 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 5:13 am

You know, that could go for Fallout 3 aswell.


And not just could, but does. After level 10, or so, in FO3 everything turns upside down after a somewhat promising start (approx levels 1-5) where things were still a threat. The abundance of supplies is so overwhelming that one can just stand still, spam stims and hold down the trigger even with the toughest of enemies hitting you.
User avatar
Adam
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:56 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 1:49 am

And not just could, but does. After level 10, or so, in FO3 everything turns upside down after a somewhat promising start (approx levels 1-5) where things were still a threat. The abundance of supplies is so overwhelming that one can just stand still, spam stims and hold down the trigger even with the toughest of enemies hitting you.

Yep. And I killed a Behemoth on level 8 with a chinese assault rifle, without using any drugs. I just ran backwards and fired. You just need a lot of ammo. The mutie will never hit you.
User avatar
Alexandra Louise Taylor
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:48 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 1:22 pm

And you don't think a bunch of people returned their copies of F3?


No I don't actually, New Vegas was broing and predictable and when people started to get bored of things in Fallout 3 they just walekd into the watseland and found a place to loot or an enemy to kill, NV doens't have that hook either.

no, there was no reason to return a fun game


This. And don't say NV was a fun game.

You thought it was fun, but not everyone did. There's always someone out there who gets bored with x game and takes it to their local Gamestop.


Yeah well I'd bet an arm that NV was returned by people who like exciting games, the only people who probably would return F3 were people who disliked fun, exciting games. And there aren't many people like that.

for me the lack of content and just super static gameworld is gamebreaking, new vegas was ok for a month or two but its just so predictable every time, and the desert is super empty it doesn't have nearly enough decent locations, you're out in the open wherver you are, very little cover anywhere, it needed like 3 times more stuff on the map, more towns, more buildings, better terrain, on the entire bottom half of the map especially instead of those huge barren dry lakes, all that space wasted, its just so empty there is no reason to travel around the map. so i'm done with the game, their dlc sales aren't gonna be all that great.


This.

I have PS3 and I won't even stick around with the game to see if the DLCs are good. I'll just come here and ask somebody.

And not just could, but does. After level 10, or so, in FO3 everything turns upside down after a somewhat promising start (approx levels 1-5) where things were still a threat. The abundance of supplies is so overwhelming that one can just stand still, spam stims and hold down the trigger even with the toughest of enemies hitting you.


Not true. (unless you use mods) It's very difficult to find supplies until level 14, level 20 on the first couple of playthroughs.

In F3 I had only about 6 stimpacks at a time but in Vegas I had 40 stimpacks at level 8, had killed a ton of the enemies including cazadores, and beat every mission except for the fight at Hoover Dam. Vegas was so easy.
User avatar
celebrity
 
Posts: 3522
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:53 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 3:55 am

I call BS. With simple ambush tactics I could kill anything in Fallout 3 with 10mm Pistol at lvl 5m NV didn't let me get away with that.
User avatar
Kayla Keizer
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:31 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 12:31 pm

I call BS. With simple ambush tactics I could kill anything in Fallout 3 with 10mm Pistol at lvl 5m NV didn't let me get away with that.

Well in FNV the enemies arent even scaled to you. they just put them at one level and leave it at that. Like the super mutant i fought at Rabbit springs that was VERY tough and was godlike.
User avatar
Abel Vazquez
 
Posts: 3334
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:25 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 3:16 am

No I don't actually, New Vegas was boring and predictable and when people started to get bored of things in Fallout 3 they just walked into the watseland and found a place to loot or an enemy to kill, NV doens't have that hook either.
...
This. And don't say NV was a fun game.
...
Yeah well I'd bet an arm that NV was returned by people who like exciting games, the only people who probably would return F3 were people who disliked fun, exciting games. And there aren't many people like that.
...
This.
...
I have PS3 and I won't even stick around with the game to see if the DLCs are good. I'll just come here and ask somebody.
...
Not true. (unless you use mods) It's very difficult to find supplies until level 14, level 20 on the first couple of playthroughs.
...
In F3 I had only about 6 stimpacks at a time but in Vegas I had 40 stimpacks at level 8, had killed a ton of the enemies including cazadores, and beat every mission except for the fight at Hoover Dam. Vegas was so easy.

Whoa! I say whoa there!

This is only one post that I'm picking out as an example - I'm noticing a disturbing trend in this particular thread overall. It needs to stop before things go even more downhill.

We are really losing all sense of subjectivity with phrases like "don't say NV was a fun game," and "Yeah well I'd bet an arm that NV was returned by people who like exciting games, the only people who probably would return F3 were people who disliked fun, exciting games. And there aren't many people like that."

When you state an opinion as if it were somehow in any way, shape or form possible for it to be construed as anything resembling a solid fact - that's when threads start going sour.

This poster may not have found NV to be a fun game. This poster may not have found it exciting. These are opinions. They ought to be stated and phrased as such. If for no other reason than to make it known that you guys, at least, understand that you're only stating your own personal opinion - and don't actually expect anyone else to believe that what your saying is to be taken as an objective truth.
User avatar
Mrs shelly Sugarplum
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:16 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 3:12 pm

Not true. (unless you use mods) It's very difficult to find supplies until level 14, level 20 on the first couple of playthroughs.

In F3 I had only about 6 stimpacks at a time but in Vegas I had 40 stimpacks at level 8, had killed a ton of the enemies including cazadores, and beat every mission except for the fight at Hoover Dam. Vegas was so easy.


Yes true. Been there done that. Without mods (which I don't even like to use). And on my first runthrough (at which time I was still enthusiastic about the game, and waiting for it start delivering at any moment - which it didn't in the end). It's really not very difficult to find supplies after the first few levels as they are practically scattered all over the place. That was one of my initial gripes, that I was handheld and cuddled all the way though the game - except for the few first levels I mentioned.


You sure were in a hurry to finish the game (if you're not exaggerating out of sheer will of wanting to outscore the opposing front - "I was level thee and a half with 10000 stims and everything done and killed in Fallout 3 just before the ending of the MQ, so easy it was" /sarcasmic example). With that pace, did you ever bother actually pay any attention to what you were doing (not that not doing so would be wrong)?
User avatar
Brian LeHury
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 6:54 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 12:24 pm

That was my second plathyough, on my first I was level 30 and had about 10 more locations to discover...
User avatar
Nathan Risch
 
Posts: 3313
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 10:15 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 12:34 am

Whoa! I say whoa there!

This is only one post that I'm picking out as an example - I'm noticing a disturbing trend in this particular thread overall. It needs to stop before things go even more downhill.

We are really losing all sense of subjectivity with phrases like "don't say NV was a fun game," and "Yeah well I'd bet an arm that NV was returned by people who like exciting games, the only people who probably would return F3 were people who disliked fun, exciting games. And there aren't many people like that."

When you state an opinion as if it were somehow in any way, shape or form possible for it to be construed as anything resembling a solid fact - that's when threads start going sour.

This poster may not have found NV to be a fun game. This poster may not have found it exciting. These are opinions. They ought to be stated and phrased as such. If for no other reason than to make it known that you guys, at least, understand that you're only stating your own personal opinion - and don't actually expect anyone else to believe that what your saying is to be taken as an objective truth.


Not trying to gang up on someone, but I do indeed smell a bit of hypocricy from his posts too. :confused:
User avatar
Avril Louise
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 10:37 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 10:27 am

That was my second plathyough, on my first I was level 30 and had about 10 more locations to discover...

Really its not hard to find the locations hell there very easy. There the most obvious and simple.
User avatar
Ally Chimienti
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:53 am

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout Series Discussion